Channel
OM TRADERS™
@Om_Traders_3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
295,364subscribers
-17,970 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001806686202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Om_Traders_3 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Om_Traders_3 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 295,364 | -385 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 295,749 | -112 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 295,861 | -4,899 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 300,760 | -49 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 300,809 | -156 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 300,965 | -138 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 301,103 | -180 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 301,283 | -74 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 301,357 | -96 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 301,453 | -11,994 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:34 | 313,447 | -98 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 313,545 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 313,580 | -6,045 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 319,625 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 319,658 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 319,664 | -64 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 319,728 | -57 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 319,785 | -77 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 319,862 | -61 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 319,923 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 8 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TSHcommunity · 957 (as read 2 October 2026)#1
@Radheshyam_banknifty_Nifty_50 · 325#2
@choiceravi · 839#3
@harmonic001 · 186#4
@bigbull090 · 297#5
@learn_with_goyalinvestment · 4,215#6
@ZuperTrade · 1,210#7
@Nkpvqwithtrade · 6,360#8
@binomochampionn · 2,748#9
@oipluspro · 1,262#10
@Royal_Binomo_king · 427#11
@trader_ritvi · 9,309#12
@degencabaal · 331 (as read 2 October 2026)#13
@BinomoSignalsBest · 773#14
@tiger_binomo · 753#15
@learntraders · 2,037#16
@tradingtamilbinary · 1,278 (as read 2 October 2026)#17
@FlyingcallsArjun · 58,737#18
@AlphaQtx · 1,623#19
@SUERSHOTSO1 · 2,102#20
@Banking_Puzzles_Reasoning_group · 28,042#21
@STBangla · 7,807#22
@HarmonicsTraders · 8,131#23
@my_crypto_top · 2,889#24
@goldsnipers11 · 195,022#25
@EasyForexPips · 242,954#26
@OMMTRADERS · 17,777#27
@Pinkcityresearchanalyst · 19,434#28
@wowtradinginfo · 1,090#29
@tradingwithsailen · 260#30
@Harmonicsintra_Positional_charts · 1,108#31
@fantasysportscentral · 1,308#32
@StockMavericks7791 · 1,868#33
@StoryMemesByChandan · 2,162#34
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171#35
@CoinNitro_Official · 3,062#36
@PTE_TipsandTemplates · 3,471 (as read 2 October 2026)#37
@English_Learning_Discussion2 · 5,917#38
@crypto_vestor · 14,398#39
@dhonifantasysports · 7,034#40
@AllPremiumLeak · 2,863#41
@VocabularyVibes · 6,725#42
@stock_option_calls_put · 42,804#43
@bigpumpsbinance · 22,610#44
@next10xgem1 · 329,566#45
@MEMEaniac · 468#46
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Pinkcityresearchanalyst · 19,434
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OM TRADERS™” (@Om_Traders_3), 295,364 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Om_Traders_3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.