Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Padres Por la Verdad España II.

Channel

Padres Por la Verdad España II.

@PadresxlaVerdadE

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,458subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623581551
TypeChannel
Username@PadresxlaVerdadE
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PadresxlaVerdadE

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@PadresxlaVerdadE/28537 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC@PADRESPORLAVERDAD/340323 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC1.003 minutes
@PadresxlaVerdadE/28538 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC@PADRESPORLAVERDAD/340343 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC1.008 minutes
@PadresxlaVerdadE/28555 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC@PADRESPORLAVERDAD/340507 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC1.003 days
@PadresxlaVerdadE/28556 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC@PADRESPORLAVERDAD/340517 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC1.003 days
@PadresxlaVerdadE/28558 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC@PADRESPORLAVERDAD/340537 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC1.008.3 hours
@bycpoornamidam/205783 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC@PadresxlaVerdadE/28554 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@PADRESPORLAVERDAD14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutesthis entry (140)
@bycpoornamidam6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@bycpoornamidam (51)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @PadresxlaVerdadE — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,4586,5286,4936 August 2026 — 6,528 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,528 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,523 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,522 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,523 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,497 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,513 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,504 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,495 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,491 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,482 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,470 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,461 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,458 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,448–6,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:366,458-3
13 Sept 2026, 20:426,461-9
10 Sept 2026, 00:016,470-12
4 Sept 2026, 20:186,482-9
31 Aug 2026, 19:066,491-4
28 Aug 2026, 23:066,495-9
25 Aug 2026, 16:036,504-9
22 Aug 2026, 23:226,513+16
19 Aug 2026, 18:136,497-26
16 Aug 2026, 17:386,523+1
13 Aug 2026, 06:056,522-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:416,523-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:466,526-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,528no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:536,528first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
4m 32s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 33 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9129.6%
7323.8%
👍7323.8%
👏258.14%
247.82%
💯144.56%
😢41.30%
😁10.326%
😘10.326%
🤬10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC207 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Discurso de Trump y J.F. Kennedy, Secretario de salud: EE.UU. reduce la cantidad de vacunas de su calendario de vacunación infantil. Las muertes infantiles en EE. UU. alcanzan su punto máximo durante la primera semana de vida, esto ayudará a reducir las tasas de mortalidad, eliminan la dosis de la vacuna contra la hepatitis B al nacer... https://www.bitchute.com/video/B0Icmr9iJCWk

👏7👍2

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC229 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Fauci y su patrones ocultaron los graves riesgos de las inyecciones Covid en embarazadas Anthony Fauci expresó en privado inquietudes sobre la posible asociación entre la inyección contra COVID-19 y los abortos espontáneos en embarazadas, a pesar de haber declarado públicamente que no existían "señales de alerta" para este grupo. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/fauci-y-su-patrones-ocultaron-los-graves-riesgos-de-las

91

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

11 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC295 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Estados Unidos reduce drásticamente la cantidad de vacunas de su calendario de vacunación infantil. Las muertes infantiles en EE. UU. alcanzan su punto máximo durante la primera semana de vida, esto ayudará a reducir las tasas de mortalidad, eliminan la dosis de la vacuna contra la hepatitis B al nacer... https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/eeuu-reduce-el-calendario-de-vacunacion-infantil/

👏81😁1

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

10 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC401 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

La FDA y Moderna ocultan graves datos sobre la seguridad de la inyección de ARNm contra el cáncer. La FDA en complicidad con Moderna ocultó una señal grave de seguridad estadísticamente significativa que fue sistemáticamente diluida mediante malabarismos estadísticos. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/fda-y-moderna-ocultan-graves-datos-seguridad-inyeccion-arnm-contra-cancer/

👍8🔥4

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

10 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC383 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

El Complejo Militar-Biofarmacéutico logra mantener el programa letal de vacunación La OMS prometió un retorno de inversión de 35 a 1 a las empresas y países que adhieran a su plan de inyecciones génicas, para falsas pandemias. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/el-complejo-biofarmaceutico-logra-mantener-el-programa-letal-de-vacunacion/

10🔥2

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

10 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC370 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Esta es la verdadera realidad de Ceuta no la que te dice la tele. 🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹 PADRES POR LA VERDAD ESPAÑA II https://t.me/PadresxlaVerdadE 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸

13

Signed OVIAN

10 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,280 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"¿Sabéis cuánto recibió sólo el pasado año Cruz Roja en subvenciones? Más de 500 millones de euros. ¿Cuánto de ese dinero fue destinado a personal? 475 millones de euros. Un 92%. ¿Y qué porcentaje de este personal es sanitario? Solo un 7%. ¿Y sabéis cuánto de ese dinero fue destinado a altos cargos? 4 millones de euros. Cuatro millones de euros destinados a tan sólo 64 altos cargos. Más de 63.000€ por barba. Y mientr

87🔥2

Signed OVIAN

10 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC371 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹 PADRES POR LA VERDAD ESPAÑA II https://t.me/PadresxlaVerdadE 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹🔸

👍1

Signed OVIAN

9 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC424 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

La cantidad de vacunas que se han agregado al calendario infantil no es para proteger a los niños sino para financiar la inversión en armas biológicas. Vacunas y armas biológicas son dos caras de la misma moneda. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/ley-de-vacunas-es-para-proteger-a-los-fabricantes-de-vacunas/

10

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

8 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC491 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Relación entre la vacuna del Virus del Papiloma Humano y efectos adversos graves. Múltiples estudios han relacionado las vacunas contra el VPH con el Síndrome de dolor regional complejo, taquicardia postural ortostática y enfermedades autoinmunes. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/vacuna-del-virus-del-papiloma-humano-y-efectos-adversos-graves/

🔥81

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

8 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC485 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Los antiinflamatorios podrían provocar dolor crónico, alternativas Se ha demostrado que el jengibre , la cúrcuma , la capsaicina y la raíz de valeriana son analgésicos naturales eficaces. https://cienciaysaludnatural.com/antiinflamatorios-y-dolor-cronico-alternativas/

👍12

Signed Alber Castro CienciaySaludNatural.com

7 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,230 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍122

Signed Susa

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @PadresxlaVerdadE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Movimiento Asistencia Integral
@movimiento_asistencia_integral · 28,065
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Padres Por la Verdad España II.” (@PadresxlaVerdadE), 6,458 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PadresxlaVerdadE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.