Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✌️🇵🇸Палестина, Иран и Ближний Восток🇵🇸✌️

Channel

✌️🇵🇸Палестина, Иран и Ближний Восток🇵🇸✌️

@PalinfoRu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,747subscribers

-465 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630352235
TypeChannel
Username@PalinfoRu
Created10 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PalinfoRu

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,74726,21225,979.56 August 2026 — 26,212 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,212 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,184 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,177 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,161 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,149 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,108 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,085 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,062 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,047 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,042 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,020 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,006 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,995 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,980 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,948 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,922 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,919 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,947 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,922 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,902 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,887 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,863 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,850 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,843 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,835 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,810 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,747 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 34 days, net -465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,677–26,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 21:5825,747-63
5 Sept 2026, 11:3825,810-25
3 Sept 2026, 14:1725,835-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:5925,843-7
1 Sept 2026, 11:2525,850-13
31 Aug 2026, 08:4725,863-24
30 Aug 2026, 10:0325,887-15
29 Aug 2026, 13:1325,902-20
28 Aug 2026, 15:1725,922-25
27 Aug 2026, 17:4325,947+28
26 Aug 2026, 18:0225,919-3
25 Aug 2026, 19:0725,922-26
24 Aug 2026, 18:1325,948-32
23 Aug 2026, 03:2425,980-15
21 Aug 2026, 18:2625,995-11
20 Aug 2026, 18:4826,006-14
19 Aug 2026, 22:1126,020-22
18 Aug 2026, 20:2626,042-5
17 Aug 2026, 22:0326,047-15
16 Aug 2026, 21:2426,062first reading

Engagement

350 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.25%
avg views ÷ 25,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
288 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
288
of 350 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 266 of 288 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held350 (4 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total388,994
Reactions total7,577
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38m 17s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,716 reactions across 324 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,85526.6%
👎1,59914.9%
1,54014.4%
💔1,53214.3%
😈9148.53%
😢6035.63%
🔥5014.68%
😭2292.14%
🤩1721.61%
🎃1531.43%
🤔1491.39%
🙏1321.23%
😨1060.989%
👌840.784%
🎉410.383%
🫡320.299%
😐270.252%
🤷‍♂160.149%
🤷150.14%
🥰90.084%
4 further kinds70.065%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 328 of the 350 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,716 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 350 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💥В рамках 31-го этапа операции «Молния» иранские ракеты и ударные беспилотники атаковали американские военные объекты: На базе Ахмад-аль-Джабер в Кувейте зафиксировано поражение спутниковых систем связи, складов оборудования и ангаров боевых самолётов. На базе Аль-Минхад в ОАЭ были атакованы места размещения военнослужащих и радиолокационные системы. Иранская армия заявила, что продолжит удары в ответ на преступле

1

3 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC136 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❕🖊 Россия тайно оказывает Ирану содействие в разработке гиперзвуковых ракет, предназначенных для поражения американских военных кораблей, — New York Post

🔥3👍2

3 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC193 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❕ Глава МИД Ирана встретился с делегацией ХАМАС Министр иностранных дел Ирана Аббас Аракчи принял делегацию движения ХАМАС во главе с руководителем отдела арабских и исламских отношений Басимом Наимом. Аракчи подтвердил принципиальную и твёрдую позицию Ирана о продолжении всесторонней защиты страны от агрессии, а также о поддержке освобождения Палестины и создания независимого палестинского государства со столицей

3 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC265 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⚡️Шейх Акрам аль-Кааби, лидер движения сопротивления "Нуджаба", одной из крупнейших фракций Исламского сопротивления в Ираке, предупредил, что они вступят в "решаемую битву с оккупационными силами США на территории Ирака", если американские войска не выведут своих солдат из Ирака к установленному сроку – 30 сентября. Он заявил: «Если даже один солдат останется после этой даты, мы не позволим ему вернуться домой в цел

🔥4

3 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @middleeast_west

В России проверяют возможное хищение пожертвований, собранных для Газы Следственный комитет России начал проверку в связи с подозрениями в хищении денежных средств, собранных в качестве гуманитарной помощи для сектора Газа. Об этом сообщил канал «Ингушетия Новости» (IngNews), освещающий события в Республике Ингушетия. Следственный комитет — федеральный государственный орган, осуществляющий предварительное расследова

👍2

3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC336 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solidarnostfundPhoto

В чем заключается опасность новой “мягкой” пропаганды израиля? Благодаря социальным сетям и цифровой журналистике Палестина вернула свой голос, который годами искажали западные СМИ. Но когда попытка оправдать геноцид в Газе перестала работать, израиль сменил тактику. Отныне в социальных сетях и поисковиках мы видим невиданную массу статей об израиле и его населении. Оккупанты обрушили на нас терабайты информации, б

💔2😈1

2 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,370 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‼️Несколько ударов Израиля по югу Ливана сегодня👆

💔17👎5🔥3😈2😨2🙏1

2 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,230 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👎9👍1

2 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,340 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👎9🎉1

2 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,370 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👎10🤩1

2 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,210 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👎8🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,450 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❕Производство топлива из пластиковых отходов в Газе на фоне топливного кризиса На фоне продолжающегося топливного кризиса и ограничений на поставки жители лагеря Нусейрат в центральной части сектора Газа производят топливо из пластиковых отходов, используя примитивные методы. Рабочие при этом подвергаются воздействию густых токсичных испарений, представляющих серьёзную угрозу для здоровья и окружающей среды.

😢33💔72👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 350 posts we hold for @PalinfoRu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Голос Палестины 🇵🇸 | صوت فلسطين | Иран | Ливан
@voiceofpalestine · 34,042
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Umma Today
@ummatodayru · 37,673
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Yeni Şafak на русском
@yenisafak_ru · 31,631
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
TRT на русском
@trtnarusskom · 43,768
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
ParsToday Russian 🇮🇷
@parstodayrussian · 29,499
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Дневник иранского журналиста🇮🇷
@khayalpressa313 · 49,448
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Гордон Екатерина
@Gordonekaterina · 67,403
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✌️🇵🇸Палестина, Иран и Ближний Восток🇵🇸✌️” (@PalinfoRu), 25,747 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PalinfoRu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.