Когда спросили, почему избирателям стоит голосовать именно за тебя. Ворчание говорит лучше тысячи слов.
😁72😭12😎3🤩1🤮1

Channel
@niysoo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
120,541subscribers
-73,580 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001747080705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @niysoo |
| Description | Телеграм-канал деоккупационной организации "Нийсо". Для связи с нами: - @grocityestate - WhatsApp номер https://wa.me/17788525077 Весь список контактов: https://t.me/niysoo/30224 |
| Created | 26 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/niysoo |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 120,541 | -19,234 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 139,775 | -559 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 140,334 | -428 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 140,762 | -381 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:12 | 141,143 | -171 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 141,314 | -220 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 141,534 | -362 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 141,896 | -263 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 142,159 | -207 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 142,366 | -235 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 142,601 | -410 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 143,011 | -11,228 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 154,239 | -6,227 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 160,466 | -1,019 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 161,485 | -7,108 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 168,593 | -21,360 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 189,953 | -469 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 190,422 | -705 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 191,127 | -618 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 191,745 | first reading |
412 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 412 (4 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,016,129 |
| Reactions total | 34,506 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 05:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 137 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40,809 reactions across 394 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 11,058 | 27.1% | |
| 😁 | 10,083 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 5,595 | 13.7% | |
| 🤮 | 3,752 | 9.19% | |
| 🤬 | 3,032 | 7.43% | |
| ❤ | 2,613 | 6.40% | |
| 🔥 | 962 | 2.36% | |
| 😡 | 532 | 1.30% | |
| 🎉 | 396 | 0.97% | |
| 🤯 | 383 | 0.939% | |
| 🤝 | 312 | 0.765% | |
| 😭 | 305 | 0.747% | |
| 😢 | 299 | 0.733% | |
| 💔 | 284 | 0.696% | |
| 😨 | 226 | 0.554% | |
| ⚡ | 224 | 0.549% | |
| 👏 | 177 | 0.434% | |
| 🗿 | 131 | 0.321% | |
| ❤🔥 | 126 | 0.309% | |
| 👎 | 76 | 0.186% | |
| 11 further kinds | 243 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 406 of the 412 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 412 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда спросили, почему избирателям стоит голосовать именно за тебя. Ворчание говорит лучше тысячи слов.
😁72😭12😎3🤩1🤮1
Марионеточный режим, хоть и вынужден изображать представительную демократию (как и в России), прекрасно осознаёт фальшивость предстоящих выборов. Даже если исходить из логики российского государства, происходящее является абсурдом. В условиях, когда в каждом кабинете и школьном классе годами висят портреты одного кандидата, а другие кандидаты боятся даже где-то промолвить, что они вообще-то тоже участвуют в этом про…
👍31💯16❤2👏2
Крайне интересная статья 2003 года от издания "ИноСми", передающая атмосферу российских "выборов" на пост губернатора Чечни. Как и сейчас, тогда ни у кого не было сомнений, что победит Ахмат Кадырова. Другим кандидатам просто сказали "нет". И сделал это не Ахмат, а Кремль. Ставку сделали на бывшего муфтия, поэтому другим марионеткам нужно было просто с этим смириться. Спустя 23 года, ничего не поменялось.
💯47❤4😢2
📦 Из присланного на обратную связь.
👍48💯8👏3❤2🤝1
Live stream scheduled for Sep 12 at 19:00
🎥 Российские ставленники всё чаще пытаются определять, как должны выглядеть и вести себя чеченцы. Длинные бороды, никабы и полноценный хиджаб объявляются «чуждыми» и нежелательными, тогда как многие проявления русификации общества остаются без внимания. Почему предатели так обеспокоены исламскими нормами внешнего вида, но при этом спокойно относятся к процессам, ведущим к разложению общества? Чтобы обсудить эти вопр…
👍40🔥4❤2🤝2
Читают.
💯51😁18👍3😭1
Ставленников Москвы абсолютно не беспокоит то, что чеченцы начали следовать чуждому. Напротив, русификация населения — одна из самых главных задач, которая перед ними стоит. Поэтому контролёр бород и борец с никабами не обеспокоен русскими костюмами в школах и на концертах, не говорит об облегающих и вульгарных «хиджабах», не высказывает недовольства внешним видов туристов, которые уже позируют с голым животом перед…
🤬61💯17❤3👏1😁1
Что заставляет российский режим прибегать к коллективной ответственности? Почему они мстят старикам, женщинам и детям, за поступки их близких? В первую очередь, это страх и беспомощность. Они понимают, что вся их власть держится на силе, поэтому чтобы её удержать, они используют самые грязные методы. По другому, у них просто ничего не выйдет. Они не могут предложить людям ничего кроме террора. Весь их аргумент: вы …
💯10👍2❤1
▶️Голосовой чат NIYSO (08.09.2026): Практика похищения людей в Чечне российским режимом https://youtu.be/dm59invKlkY
Напомним, что в отличии от вышестоящих российских чиновников и сотрудников, небольшая часть рядовых имели мужество признать, что похищать и мучать родственников противника режима является крайне низким делом. Они согласны, что борьбу нужно вести справедливо и не посягать на тех, кто невиновен. То есть, несмотря на своё положение в Исламе, у некоторых сотрудников имеется базовое понятие справедливости в этом вопросе,…
💯12👏1
После 26 лет оккупации и тотальной диктаторы, всё чем могут отреагировать враги Аллаха это угрозы родственникам. Это уже не первый раз, когда российский чиновник, на весь мир заявляет о коллективной ответственности. Кремль, как и во все прошлые разы, полностью проигнорирует эти высказывания. И всё по одной причине: это и есть их политика по удержанию контроля над нашей территорией. Именно кураторы из ФСБ, наряжают К…
🤬10💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 412 posts we hold for @niysoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@niysoo edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мнения отца и сына разделились. Отец утверждает, что чеченцы никогда не умирали с голоду, а значит, нам не следует бояться отделения от России. А сын клянётся, что без России чеченцы не продержаться и один месяц. Кто из этих двух лгал нам?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Имеют ли право чеченцы выражать своё несогласие с постройкой церкви на территории Чечни, как это делают россияне при строительстве мечети?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 412 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NIYSO” (@niysoo), 120,541 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niysoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.