Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GALGAY KOMITET

Channel

GALGAY KOMITET

@ingcommitte

Not marked by Telegram, checked 18 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,894subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002241545600
TypeChannel
Username@ingcommitte
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ingcommitte

Growth

1,8881,9051,896.56 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,900 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,898 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,894 subscribers1,8946 August 20264 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,885–1,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 13:191,894-4
1 Sept 2026, 05:381,898-7
29 Aug 2026, 03:151,905+7
26 Aug 2026, 07:031,898-5
23 Aug 2026, 08:421,903-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:421,905+5
16 Aug 2026, 14:231,900+1
12 Aug 2026, 16:041,899+5
9 Aug 2026, 06:471,894+5
6 Aug 2026, 17:001,889+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:361,888no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:521,888first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 27s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11041.0%
💯4918.3%
custom 53935867516944670123613.4%
🔥2910.8%
😁248.96%
🤬134.85%
🤯62.24%
🤔10.373%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ingcommitte. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ассаламу алейкум ва рахьматуллахи ва баракатуху! 🔴 Сегодня, 7 августа, в 22:00 по северокавказскому времени (Магас, Мекка, Стамбул) на Telegram-канале и YouTube-канале Комитета Ингушской Независимости состоится прямой эфир с Ансаром Гаркхо в формате «Вопрос - ответ». Обсудим актуальные события и положение оккупированной Галгайче. ⚠️ Свои вопросы можно заранее отправить через бот обратной связи. Во время трансляции

👍1💯1custom 53935867516944670121

7 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC222 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вместо ядерных грибов над странами НАТО, которых так ждали турбопатриоты РФ, пока лишь клубы дыма размером с ядерный гриб поднимаются над самой Россией. Получите и распишитесь. Да, именно так выглядит «Киев за три дня». И дальше будет только хуже. С приближением зимы украинские баллистические ракеты, которые, вероятнее всего, выйдут на конвейер к осени, вместе с дронами могут начать планомерные удары по объектам эне

👍8🔥2🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC308 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Все видели видео, где русские установили пулемет от вертолета на турель в грузовике и стрелка после первых выстрелов вынесло за борт машины. Так вот, Евкуров тоже видел. Поэтому вместо нормальных испытаний со стрельбой хитрый Евкуров, знающий, что сумрачный русский военно-инженерный гений вполне себе способен уменьшить количество русских генералов в его лице, предпочел обойтись не самой технически грамотной теорией.

😁15👍3

5 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC517 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ассаламу алейкум ва рахматуллахи ва баракатуху! إِنَّا لِلَّهِ وَإِنَّا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُونَ Сегодня, 5 августа 2026 года, по милости Аллаха, нам удалось перезахоронить нашу сестру Евлоеву Айшат, которая вернулась к Аллаху полтора месяца назад. Айшат было 62 года. Последние 30 лет она жила с мужем в небольшой украинской деревне на границе с Курской областью РФ. После полномасштабного вторжения РФ в Украину их семь

👍20🤯2custom 53935867516944670122

4 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC442 views22 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как устроен Комитет Ингушской Независимости? КИН представляет собой организацию с четко выстроенной внутренней структурой, в которую входят специализированные подразделения, отвечающие за различные направления деятельности. В состав Комитета входят: GALGAY ESKAR (ИОА) – военное крыло КИН. Информационно-аналитический отдел – подготовка аналитических материалов, информационная работа и стратегические коммуникации.

👍12🔥6custom 53935867516944670124

4 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC338 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DHR_BAQOPhoto

Избитый в Грузии имам отказался от заявления в полицию Имам местных мусульман – турок-ахыска Шевкет Двалидзе, избитый в грузинском городе Ахалцихе, отказался от своего заявления. Об этом изданию BAQO сообщил имам одной из мечетей в грузинской автономии Аджария. «Он отказался от своего заявления, вероятно, под давлением полиции. Выглядит всё так, что нападавших накажут лишь символически», – сказал собеседник. Он так

🤬8custom 53935867516944670122👍1

4 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC474 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

О беспрецедентных зверствах российских военнослужащих, об их жестокости и случаях, когда людей убивают ради забавы, уже давно никого не удивить. Память об этих бессмысленных зверствах совсем свежа в ингушском обществе. Мы помним 1992 год, убийства и пытки ингушей в Пригородном районе. Людей убивали, пытали, расчленяли, издевались над телами погибших, заживо сжигали в автомобильных покрышках. Среди жертв были женщины

💯18🤬5🤯3😁1

3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC499 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Комитет Ингушской Независимости, сокращенно КИН, представляет собой военно-политическую структуру, организованную по принципу джамаата. Главной целью КИН является деоккупация Галгайче (Ингушетии) и формирование основы для будущего независимого ингушского государства, построенного на принципах Исламского права (шариата). https://t.me/ingcommitte

custom 539358675169446701215👍5

3 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,040 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Жители Галгайче жалуются на поломки топливных систем автомобилей из-за некачественного бензина. Вполне ожидаемо, что недобросовестные владельцы автозаправок будут разбавлять горючее различными примесями, чтобы увеличить его объём. Продажа бензина с октановым числом, близким к АИ-92, под видом более высокой марки и до кризиса была не редкостью. Однако сейчас ситуация заметно ухудшается. На этом фоне большинство авто

👍5

3 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC474 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Краткий видеоотчёт Владимиру Путину от местного жителя. Сегодня, 3 августа 2026 года, крупные пожары вспыхнули на объектах логистической инфраструктуры компании Wildberries. В результате возгораний во Владимирской и Самарской областях сгорели крупные логистические хабы суммарной площадью более 300 тысяч квадратных метров. Это примерно 42 стандартных футбольных поля. СВО идёт строго по плану! https://t.me/ingcommi

🔥8😁8

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ingcommitte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTCAnonymous Poll76 voters

Как вы относитесь к этой цитате из статьи выше? «Ваши „отцы-основатели РИ“ создавали республику назло соседям. Мы же призываем основать государство ради Всевышнего Аллаха…»

  1. Полностью согласен с этой мыслью32%
  2. Скорее согласен21%
  3. Не согласен с такой оценкой основателей РИ22%
  4. Считаю само противопоставление неправильным7%
  5. Это явно перебор5%
  6. Затрудняюсь ответить7%
  7. Вообще не понимаю о чем речь7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NIYSO
@niysoo · 120,541
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Комитет ингушской независимости (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…штаб-квартира = [[Стамбул]], [[Турция]] | официальный сайт = {{url|https://t.me/ingcommitte}} }} '''Комитет ингушской независимости''' (сокр. КИН; {{lang-inh|Ğalğay…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GALGAY KOMITET” (@ingcommitte), 1,894 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ingcommitte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.