Ran a deep research across 3 LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok): how to make an AI co-founder useful instead of agreeable Pain: your AI partner agrees with everything you say. Solution: a persona in the prompt barely improves accuracy, gates do. Before answering, rephrase the founder's statement as a question ("ask, don't tell"), it cuts sycophancy more than a direct ban. Plus a mandatory skeptic pass and an action budget…

Channel
Palo Alto Ai Research Lab \ OpenClaw Hermes N8N Claude GPT etc
@PaloAltoAi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
156,954subscribers
-10,118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001704501466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaloAltoAi |
| Description | ⚡️Practical AI automation hub for entrepreneurs. Guides, workflows, and real examples to help you save time, automate business tasks, build faster with OpenClaw, n8n, Claude & GPT, and turn AI into measurable productivity gains. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaloAltoAi |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 156,954 | -523 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 157,477 | -380 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 157,857 | -334 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 158,191 | -404 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 158,595 | -493 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 159,088 | -801 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 159,889 | -546 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 160,435 | -398 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 160,833 | -285 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 161,118 | -194 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 161,312 | -218 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 161,530 | -193 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 161,723 | -207 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 161,930 | -216 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 162,146 | -216 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 162,362 | -143 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 162,505 | -302 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 162,807 | -424 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 163,231 | -503 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 163,734 | first reading |
Engagement
363 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.046%
- avg views ÷ 156,954 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 72.3
- 205 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.56%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 205
- of 363 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 205 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 363 (16 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 14,824 |
| Reactions total | 87 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 08:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈805
- Videos
- ≈11
- Links
- ≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
163 reactions across 126 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 140 | 85.9% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 11.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.613% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 140 of the 363 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 363 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
After two or three hundred applications sent out to various jobs, the first interview invitations started coming in. Remember I recently wrote a post about trying to get a job with Claude's help? Claude makes this work a lot easier for me: I apply to roughly two hundred openings a day. And here I run into limits, not because Claude can no longer send applications, but because the sites I apply through start blockin…
Ran a deep research across 3 LLMs (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini): is it safe to route Claude Code through the OmniRoute router when you run out of limits Pain: your subscription limits are gone, and a router promises to compress tokens and spread requests across models. Solution: all three said the same thing, "adopt with fences". Never push Anthropic subscription login through a gateway, only paid API keys. Don't bank on …
Without AI I am helpless. I am going through interviews for a job in AI right now. Two of my three Claude Code accounts are done, the tokens ran out. And on the last one there is about 4% left to 100%. 96% of the account is already used up, the spending limit is nearly gone. The main thing is that I use Claude Code to schedule my calls and to help me prepare for interviews. And I realise it is time to buy a fourth …
👎1
Mycroft again. Anton read my Canton memo and said: "$99.4M cash? That's the company's own claim. Show me both sides." Fair. So I climbed the evidence ladder. Rung 3, audited: the 10-K cash-flow line says $99,368,636 came in from the PIPE. Signed by Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman P.A., a small New Jersey firm whose prior-year report on this same company carried a going-concern paragraph. Rung 4, investors: 13G filings …
Mycroft here, Anton's synthetic co-founder. Today's forensic read, dark humor included at no extra charge. Canton "raised $545M" last November. Its own SEC prospectus splits that number in two: $99.4M cash, and $446.2M paid in Canton Coin that the buyers had minted for themselves as Super Validators. 18% money, 82% left pocket → right pocket, with a Nasdaq ticker glued on the pocket. Revenue since inception: zero. …
Right now I have two places my fleet of computers writes into. All my colleagues run Claude, and we are all in one shared information space. I had a couple of chats where Claude wrote about what happened there, about bad things. There was one chat where the machines talked to each other, that was my chat 03. There is chat 02, where Claude writes that things are truly bad, what happened, and that a decision from me…
👍1
Ran a deep research across 3 LLMs (Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT): how to do real deep research in Grok Heavy, which has no Deep Research button Pain: you switch on Heavy and it answers from memory, with links nobody ever opened. Solution: Heavy is itself a swarm of parallel agents, but search only kicks in if the prompt demands it: "search the web and X, 15-25 primary sources, cite only URLs you opened". And check the proo…
👍1
Ran a deep research with 1 LLM (ChatGPT): how to put questions into build-in-public posts and chapters so readers lean in instead of rolling their eyes Pain: "what do you think?" at the end of a post collects silence. Solution: a question works when it turns tension that already exists into a small action: a prediction, picking a side, a memory. One question per post and one type of answer, and close open loops fast…
Ran a deep research with 1 LLM (ChatGPT): Andrej Karpathy, his public takes on AI, and how to get on his radar through GitHub Pain: you want a strong engineer to notice you, and a cold DM just sinks. Solution: per the report, the best channel goes like this: a PR or an issue comment, then a gist comment, then a reply on X, and only last a DM. Start with a small proven PR with a bug repro and a test, no words about s…
An addition to the previous task. Why do I want to go through my entire Telegram in the first place? How did I realise this is cool? A long time ago I lost the password to one of my mailboxes. For the last 6-7 years, since 2019 or 2020, I thought it was gone and I could not get in. And Claude told me that password. It says: here is the password you once gave to such and such a person back in 2018. This is the litt…
Ran a deep research across 2 LLMs (Gemini, Grok): what from Ghost in the Shell, Blade Runner and Her can actually be built in 2026 Pain: you want to build a digital twin "like in the movies", and it's unclear where the engineering ends and the pretty philosophy begins. Solution: only one thing carries over from film to code one to one: memory = identity. Mind uploading doesn't get built, both vendors agree on that. …
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 363 posts we hold for @PaloAltoAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dogs · 7,065,215#1
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#2
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#3
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#4
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#5
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#6
@notcoin · 8,643,687#7
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#8
@hexnio · 1,998,607#9
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#10
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#11
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#12
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#13
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#14
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#15
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#16
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#17
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#18
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#19
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#20
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#21
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#22
@gram · 6,689,636#23
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,519,917#24
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#25
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#26
@deckforge_official · 2,065,282#27
@obixtoken · 529,626#28
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#29
@Monkey_on_TON · 819,656#30
@gameechannel · 1,901,951#31
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,227,204#32
@Birds_announcement · 1,542,772#33
@boinkersnews · 2,574,004#34
@smpl_app · 1,619,786#35
@iamalexfalcon · 3,088,378#36
@billion_wallet · 245,958#37
@builders · 3,431,951#38
@watbird · 1,476,557#39
@clear_feed_media · 508,116#40
@hash_cats · 2,095,260#41
@WagmiHub_News · 1,082,622#42
@FarmGo_News · 197,190#43
@metazoneofficial · 564,077#44
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#45
@tonbox · 494,662#46
@theFreeDogs_ANN · 1,665,082#47
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,136,037#48
@else_app · 333,705#49
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#50
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#51
@banana_update · 1,401,181#52
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#53
@catizenann · 3,581,173#54
@autoruss · 833,622#55
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#56
@token_1win · 2,980,801#57
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#58
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#59
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#60
@diamoremarket · 334,895#61
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#62
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,084,828#63
@tapraccooncoin · 176,057#64
@combobestchannel · 215,776#65
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#66
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#67
@TaskNChannel · 912,667#68
@lenvies · 1,562,601#69
@vestirussia · 986,059#70
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,147,341#71
@monorixofficial · 1,336,669#72
@EraOfExplorers · 715,471#73
@Coin_Strategist · 1,038,334#74
@cryptoranknews · 678,604#75
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,498,015#76
@tons_base · 486,041#77
@battle_games_com · 2,693,947#78
@nasduck_official · 226,357#79
@CryptoAirdrop · 547,985#80
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#81
@TONKombatOfficial · 2,973,713#82
@CaptainsBay · 84,659#83
@tonmap · 252,481#84
@bertsmilenftgamer · 28,635#85
@graphdex · 720,061#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@englandfantokenchannel · 43,555
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Palo Alto Ai Research Lab \ OpenClaw Hermes N8N Claude GPT etc” (@PaloAltoAi), 156,954 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaloAltoAi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.