Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حق تقدم و پذیره نویسی

Channel

حق تقدم و پذیره نویسی

@Pazire_nevisi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,872subscribers

+2,365 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001970188298
TypeChannel
Username@Pazire_nevisi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pazire_nevisi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

9,060 average views per post against 11,872 subscribers — an engagement rate of 76.3%. Across the 6,095 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.85% and 13.2%, with a median of 6.54%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled163,120
Mature posts only76.3% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers11,872 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,095 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.85% · p50 6.54% · p75 13.2% · p90 21.9%
Position in cohort99.721th percentile · 11.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.246% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,50011,87210,6866 August 2026 — 9,507 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,500 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,522 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,514 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,654 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,291 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,328 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,338 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,564 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,599 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,617 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,643 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,656 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,648 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,652 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,725 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,050 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,139 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,314 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,356 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,872 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,365. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,144–12,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:4211,872+516
15 Sept 2026, 23:3911,356+42
14 Sept 2026, 05:2111,314+175
12 Sept 2026, 14:5811,139+89
10 Sept 2026, 14:5511,050+325
7 Sept 2026, 07:4010,725+73
4 Sept 2026, 12:1710,652+4
2 Sept 2026, 23:5710,648-8
1 Sept 2026, 19:2510,656+13
31 Aug 2026, 19:0610,643+26
30 Aug 2026, 21:5210,617+18
29 Aug 2026, 19:1410,599+35
28 Aug 2026, 22:2610,564+48
28 Aug 2026, 01:1310,516+17
27 Aug 2026, 01:5410,499+161
26 Aug 2026, 01:4410,338+10
25 Aug 2026, 05:0410,328+37
24 Aug 2026, 03:0310,291+76
22 Aug 2026, 13:4410,215+561
19 Aug 2026, 11:169,654first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.3%
avg views ÷ 11,872 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,060
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.365%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held82 (19 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total163,120
Reactions total596
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 27s
Average length
4m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,927 reactions across 81 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤82742.9%
👍41221.4%
👎32917.1%
😢904.67%
😁814.20%
👏572.96%
🔥452.34%
😱452.34%
🤡251.30%
😍90.467%
💔50.259%
🎉10.052%
🕊10.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈4,200 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

پذیره نویسی صندوق درامد ثابت #نوید شنبه ۱۴ شهریور ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره نویسی 🆔 @Pazire_nevisi

👎14❤4👍2

31 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈4,850 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026

با توجه به این که خیلی ها نقدینگی عرضه اولیه #تابان رو نداشتن و مقدار کمتری از این عرضه اولیه رو سفارش گذاشتن به هر کد سقف 3,697 سهم معادل 4 میلیون و 700 هزار تومان تخصیص پیدا کرد ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره نویسی 🆔 @Pazire_nevisi

❤22😢9👎1

31 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈16,700 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨 خبر مهم از عرضه اولیه #تابان_فردا طبق آخرین خبرها، حدود ۱,۹۹۳,۰۰۰ کد در این عرضه اولیه مشارکت کردند! 🔥 حالا اگر عرضه شامل ۶ میلیارد برگه سهم باشه، به هر کد به‌طور میانگین حدود ۳,۰۰۰ سهم می‌رسه. 💰 یعنی احتمالاً سهم هر کد حدود ۳.۸ تا ۳.۹ میلیون تومان #تابان خواهد بود! ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره نویسی 🆔 @Pazire_nevisi

👍14👎7❤2

31 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈4,900 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

همین‌طور که بازار و مردم درگیر #تابان بزرگ‌ترین عرضه اولیه بورس هستند، #دلار هم بی‌سروصدا در نیم‌ساعت از ۲۱۰ هزار تومان عبور کرد! اما نکته مهم‌تر از خودِ عدد ۲۱۰ هزار تومان، محدوده مقاومتی پیش‌روی دلاره؛ محدوده ۲۱۰ تا ۲۱۷ هزار تومان رو به‌عنوان مقاومت مهم دلار زیر نظر دارم و فعلاً بعیده قیمت به‌راحتی بتونه از این محدوده عبور کنه. شاید بعضی‌ها بگن: «۷ هزار تومان فاصله بین ۲۱۰ تا ۲۱۷ هزار تومنه، پس محدوده بزرگیه!» …

👍14❤3💔3😢1

31 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈5,080 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026

شروع سفارش‌گيری عرضه اولیه #تابان دوره ثبت سفارش از ساعت 9:30 لغایت ساعت 13:30 می‌باشد. سقف قیمت : 12.800 تعداد: 13.280 سهم حداکثر نقدینگی مورد نیاز 17.000.000 تومان ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره نویسی 🆔 @Pazire_nevisi

❤7

30 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈5,450 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#پلاست تصویری دیده‌نشده از کانال‌های اشتراکی بعضی کانال‌ها که اسمشون رو نمیارم؛ نمونه‌ای از ضرری که همین مدل سهم‌ها به اعضاشون وارد کرده! اما چیزی که هنوز برای من جای سوال داره اینه: چرا بعضی‌ها حاضرن ۴۰ میلیون تومان ضرر کنن، ولی حاضر نیستن یک‌بار ۱۰ میلیون تومان برای آموزش اصولی هزینه کنن تا از تکرار همین اشتباهات جلوگیری کنن؟! گاهی هزینه نکردن برای آموزش، خودش گرون‌ترین تصمیمه. ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره نویسی…

👍8❤5😱3😢2

29 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈4,460 views34 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @arzeavalie_officialPhoto

⭕️ عرضه اولیه #خگلپا چهارشنبه 11 شهریور ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ اطلاع از آخرین عرضه اولیه ها: 🌐@arzeavalie_official

👎16👍9❤8😁1

29 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈5,800 views26 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔺 در روندهای صعودی قدرتمند، نوسانگیری باعث میشه شما از روند اصلی جا بمونید! این موضوع رو به کرات طی روزهای اخیر تجربه کردید حتماً که به عنوان نمونه، سهام پرپتانسیل با عرضه همراه شده و اقدام به فروش کردید، روزهای بعدش مجدداً تقاضا غالب شده و سهم به مسیر صعودی ادامه داده. در نمادی مثل #وتوصا هم طی روند جاری بارها این اتفاق افتاده و امروزم بعد از کاور کردن عرضه‌ها دوباره به حوالی صف خرید رسیده. در چنین سهامی، نوسانگی…

👍18❤8

28 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈20,300 views41 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

📌عرضه اولیه #تابان؛ چرا بحث بسته شدن نماد مطرح شده؟ #تابان_فردا هنوز عرضه اولیه نشده، اما از همین حالا بحث افزایش سرمایه ۱۰۰٪ از محل سود انباشته مطرح شده. توی این ویدئو بررسی کردم: 🔹 آیا ممکنه نماد بعد از عرضه مثل #رهیاب برای مدتی بسته بشه؟ 🔹 اصلاً چرا صحبت از بسته شدن نماد شده؟ 🔹 فرآیند افزایش سرمایه چقدر زمان می‌بره؟ 🔹 شرکت سودده هست یا نه؟ 🔹 و در نهایت، چه محدوده‌ای می‌تونه برای ورود به سهم جذاب باشه؟ 🎥 اگر قص…

👍30❤7👎2🤡1😱1

28 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈7,140 views43 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

☀️ پذیره‌نویسی صندوق پروژه نیروگاه‌های خورشیدی #نور پذیره‌نویسی صندوق پروژه نیروگاه‌های خورشیدی نور از سه‌شنبه هفته آینده آغاز میشه و تا زمان تکمیل ظرفیت صندوق ادامه خواهد داشت. 💰 این صندوق قراره با عرضه عمومی تا سقف ۵ همت در بازار سرمایه فعالیتش رو شروع کنه. جزئیات بیشتر از جمله نحوه پذیره‌نویسی، قیمت و میزان نقدینگی موردنیاز رو به محض مشخص شدن اطلاع‌رسانی می‌کنیم. ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال پذیره‌نویسی 🆔 @Pazire_nev

❤26👍11👎6

27 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈8,200 views120 reactionsread 1 September 2026

📌 اما یه نکته: وقتی ارزش روز سهام عدالت رو با سودی که پرداخت میشه مقایسه می‌کنیم، واقعاً ارقام سود خیلی پایینه! من خودم پارسال ۱۵ میلیون تومان #صبا خریدم و سود سالانه همون مبلغ چیزی حدود ۲ میلیون تومان شد؛ حالا سهام عدالت با ارزشی که گفته میشه به بالای ۵۰–۶۰ میلیون تومان رسیده، قراره حدود ۴۰۰ تا ۹۸۰ هزار تومان سود پرداخت کنه! 🤔 به نظرتون این میزان سود، نسبت به ارزش فعلی سبد سهام عدالت منطقیه؟ ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📲 کانال …

👎81❤24😱8👏5👍1🕊1

27 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈22,000 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔴 واریز سود سهام عدالت از امروز شروع میشه! 💵 سود تقریبی بر اساس ارزش اسمی سبد سهام عدالت: ▪️ ۴۵۲ هزار تومانی: حدود ۴۴۳ هزار تومان ▪️ ۵۳۲ هزار تومانی: حدود ۵۲۱ هزار تومان ▪️ ۱ میلیون تومانی: حدود ۹۸۱ هزار تومان برای دیدن جزئیات بیشتر به کانال پذیره نویسی مراجعه کنید 👇👇 🆔 @Pazire_nevisi

😁14❤8🤡5😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @Pazire_nevisi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عرضه اولیه
@arzeavalie_official · 47,904
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
بورس عرضه اولیه
@boursearzeh1 · 53,085
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
کانال عرضه اولیه
@arzeh1avalieha · 100,146
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil
@mohsen_tahlil · 37,870
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
احسان اصفهانی(تابلوبازی)
@tablobaziii · 30,033
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
✍بورس پلاس +
@bourse_plussss · 35,058
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
کانال عرضه اولیه
@arzeh1avalieh1 · 25,456
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
کانال رسمی آموزش مفید
@mofidsecuritiesofficial · 79,102
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
گلدن بورس
@Goldenn_Bourse · 43,611
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
‌بورسار | مجتبی سلطانی
@BoursarMedia · 31,100
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 24,454
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,169
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 28,028
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
نیما دانایی
@Nima_danaii · 21,853
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
تاپ سیگنال (Vip)
@VIP_Top_Signal · 29,480
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Kian1one | کیانوان
@kian1one · 52,646
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
آکادمی خلیفه |بورس و طلا آبشده|
@khalife_bourse_tala · 30,675
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
گروه مالی فارابی
@farabinvest · 52,359
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حق تقدم و پذیره نویسی” (@Pazire_nevisi), 11,872 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pazire_nevisi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.