Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏴Pedro Chaparro CANAL

Channel

🏴Pedro Chaparro CANAL

@PedroChaparro

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,206subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821747708
TypeChannel
Username@PedroChaparro
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PedroChaparro

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@PedroChaparro/3039 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL/90371 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC1.0019 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@DEMOCRACIA_NACIONAL6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.0 hoursthis entry (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @PedroChaparro — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,1991,2151,2076 August 2026 — 1,206 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,205 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,207 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,206 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,210 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,207 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,203 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,205 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,215 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,202 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,199 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,206 subscribers1,2066 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,197–1,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:351,206+7
14 Sept 2026, 23:011,199-3
10 Sept 2026, 23:411,202-13
5 Sept 2026, 13:351,215+10
1 Sept 2026, 20:051,205+2
26 Aug 2026, 17:561,203-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:151,207-3
20 Aug 2026, 09:531,210+4
17 Aug 2026, 09:571,206-1
10 Aug 2026, 07:281,207+2
7 Aug 2026, 04:371,205-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:481,206no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:181,206first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈134 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hay una operación de difamaciones constantes por parte de los sionistas contra DN y nuestros hermanos Rusos. Ladren, luego cabalgamos.

4 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,980 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🇪🇸🇮🇹 Pedro Chaparro, presidente de Democracia Nacional, cerró en representación de DN el "Campo de Azione" organizado por Forza Nuova Italia en la localidad de Predappio. En su intervención habló del inicio de un periodo de Nueva Reconquista. Una Reconquista en la que ya no llevamos espadas ni corazas, pero sí caminamos con el legado de los héroes que forjaron la vieja Europa tras nosotros. Un discurso de identidad

4 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈850 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

《DN en The Occidental Observer》 Kevin B. MacDonald, psicólogo evolutivo estadounidense y antiguo profesor de la Universidad Estatal de California en Long Beach. Editor de The Occidental Observer, dedicada expresamente a contenidos sobre «identidad e intereses blancos». MacDonald es conocido principalmente por sus libros sobre el judaísmo y la influencia política y cultural judía, especialmente la trilogía The Cultur

4 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈146 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2026/08/02/the-moroccan-invasion-of-spain/

4 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈104 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Para sorpresa de nadie, la sinagoga digital de Federico sale en defensa de su amo israelí. Ya sabes, si eres un mal pensado que cree que detrás de Marruecos están Israel y el lobby judío americano, vives en la "conspiranoia" y crees en "complots judeomasonicos". https://www.libertaddigital.com/internacional/oriente-medio/2026-08-03/carmelo-jorda-el-complot-judeomasonico-llega-a-ceuta-7445014/

3 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC≈1,510 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ESCLUSIVA VD – La verità su Ceuta: “Dietro l’invasione Usa e Israele”. E gli immigrati residenti difendono l’arrivo dei nuovi marocchini https://fahrenheit2022.it/2026/08/03/ceuta-marocchini-aiutati-da-immigrati/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=SocialSnap

3 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈128 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

El que decía que detrás de los anti vacunas estaban los servicios secretos iranies y que 800.000 panchos entrando cada año en España eran pocos, que ojalá vinieran más. Pues resulta que este más que probable cripto sefardita que lleva años defendiendo a Israel y desinformando sobre el 11M es un sionista. Vaya sorpresa.

3 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,030 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🇮🇹Luca Castellini Vicepresidente de FN en Italia en el Campo de Azione organizado en Predappio. 《"Ser Forzanouvista es implicarse las 24 horas y tomar velocidad".》

2 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈224 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Telegrama diplomático secreto de la Embajada de Estados Unidos en Madrid, fechado el 1 de octubre de 1961, durante el mandato de Franco y el reinado de Hassan II en Marruecos. El número del telegrama es el 379. Preveo que uno de los aspectos de la respuesta española será preguntarnos qué garantías puede ofrecer Estados Unidos de que la ayuda estadounidense a la Fuerza Aérea de Marruecos no será utilizada contra Espa

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PedroChaparro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Núcleo Nacional🏴
@unetenucleonacional · 32,372
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏴Pedro Chaparro CANAL” (@PedroChaparro), 1,206 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PedroChaparro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.