Channel
@PersonHunters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
211subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001114653320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PersonHunters |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PersonHunters |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 211 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 209 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 206 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 207 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 207 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
29 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 37.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 37.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 24.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 🐈⬛ Сегодня команда Person Hunters приняла участие в Global Business Services Forum (GBSF) 2026 в IT Park На форуме обсуждали развитие Узбекистана как площадки для международных бизнес-сервисов, рост кадрового потенциала и влияние искусственного интеллекта на отрасль. В программе были выступления экспертов, панельная дискуссия, нетворкинг и визиты в компании-резиденты IT Park Uzbekistan. Было полезно услышать раз…
❤4🔥3👍1
🤩 Может ли личный бренд руководителя стать реальным инструментом развития компании - или публичность топ-менеджеров остаётся лишь вопросом личной репутации? Ассоциация работодателей Узбекистана совместно с Beeline и AmCham Uzbekistan приглашают членов и гостей Ассоциации 24 июля на встречу, посвящённую роли личного бренда топов и HR-лидеров в развитии бренда работодателя. Сегодня сотрудники, кандидаты, партнёры и …
🤩 Тема встречи 24 июля: «Личный бренд топов - это социальный капитал или инструмент развития компании?» 🎙 Спикеры встречи: 🔶 Юлия Яковлева, генеральный директор Person Hunters Тема выступления: «Как HR-проекты становятся частью публичной репутации компании» Юлия расскажет, как внутренние HR-инициативы выходят за рамки компании, влияют на её восприятие на рынке и становятся важной частью репутации работодателя. 🔶 Ви…
❤1👍1🔥1
🤩 Уже сегодня состоится вебинар на тему "HR и L&D тренды в мире и странах бывшего СНГ: что важно знать уже сегодня?" Приглашаем всех HR-специалистов, руководителей, L&D-экспертов и всех, кто занимается развитием сотрудников и организационными изменениями на бесплатный вебинар сегодня 15 июля в 17:00! Мы обсудим ключевые тенденции, которые уже сегодня влияют на компании по всему миру. Спикеры - эксперты СBSD Светлан…
🔥3❤2👍1
#пакеты #аналитика 🤩 Какой уровень аналитики нужен именно вашему бизнесу? Одной компании достаточно понимать, сколько сегодня платит рынок по ключевым должностям. Другой – важно оценить не только уровень заработных плат, но и бонусы, премии, KPI, социальные пакеты и полную стоимость сотрудника. А третьей необходим не просто обзор рынка, а инструмент для расчета проектной стоимости персонала с учетом всех обязател…
❤2👍2🔥2
#кейс #аналитика 🤩 Кейс №3: Вы знаете, где теряете клиентов? К нам пришел клиент, который хотел понять, почему часть его клиентов не возвращается после первого контакта, консультации или покупки. На первый взгляд, все выглядело достаточно стабильно: обращения поступали, менеджеры отвечали, сервисные процессы были выстроены и казалось, что клиентский путь находится под контролем. Но клиенты не возвращались.... В к…
❤2👍2🔥2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @PersonHunters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Person Hunters” (@PersonHunters), 211 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PersonHunters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.