26 measurements spanning 26 days, net -645. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,065–35,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 03:04
35,162
-22
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
35,184
-39
30 Aug 2026, 21:36
35,223
-35
29 Aug 2026, 21:08
35,258
-19
29 Aug 2026, 00:27
35,277
-21
27 Aug 2026, 21:28
35,298
-12
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
35,310
-15
26 Aug 2026, 03:03
35,325
-31
25 Aug 2026, 03:38
35,356
-38
23 Aug 2026, 17:46
35,394
-33
22 Aug 2026, 03:48
35,427
-30
20 Aug 2026, 23:07
35,457
-28
19 Aug 2026, 19:33
35,485
-27
18 Aug 2026, 19:48
35,512
-24
17 Aug 2026, 16:36
35,536
-32
16 Aug 2026, 08:15
35,568
-41
14 Aug 2026, 19:35
35,609
-33
13 Aug 2026, 10:07
35,642
-23
12 Aug 2026, 13:28
35,665
-21
11 Aug 2026, 16:12
35,686
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.791%
avg views ÷ 35,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.463%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
71 (23 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
14,459
Reactions total
25
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
120
Links
54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 24 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
27
65.9%
💔
14
34.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عندما تراني لأول مرة، تظن أنني هادئة... وعندما تقترب مني، تتمنى لو بقيت كذلك. وحين تعرفني جيدًا، تخاف من تلك المرأة التي أخفيها خلف هدوئي؛ امرأة إذا أحبت، لا تعرف كيف تحب بنصف قلب، وإذا اشتهت قربك، جعلت المسافة بيننا تبدو كأقسى أنواع العذاب.
أنا هادئة... نعم، لكن لا تقترب كثيرًا إن كنت تخشى أن أحبك، فأنا حين أقع في الحب، لا أكتفي بأن أسكن قلبك... أريد أن أكون ارتباك نبضك، وسهر عينيك، والفكرة التي تأتيك كلما أغمضت عين…
ممتنٌ لك...
ممتنٌ لكل دفءٍ ظنته يومًا وطنًا، ولكل كلمةٍ منك استطاعت أن تُسكت وجعًا لم تكن تعرفه. ممتنٌ لكل وعدٍ كاذب صدقته، لأنني كنت أريد للحقيقة أن تكون أجمل مما كانت عليه. ممتنٌ لك لأنك لم تكن حبًا كما ظننت، بل كنت درسًا متنكرًا في هيئة حب؛ جئت لتعلمني أن بعض الذين نفتح لهم أبواب أرواحنا، يدخلون منها ليتركوا الفوضى وراءهم ويرحلوا. ممتنٌ لكل مرة ظننت أنني لن أنجو منك، ثم نجوت. لكل ليلة حسبت أن وجعك أكبر مني، ثم اكت…
الحقيقة التي يجب أن تدركها لتنضج، أنه ليس من الضروري أن يتصل بك أصدقاؤك كل يوم كي لا تكون وحيدًا، وأنه ليس هناك مايخجل في أن تتناول طعامك وحيدًا، وانه عادي جدًا ان تقوم بنشر بعض تفاصيلك اليومية ولا تلاقي اهتمامًا، وأن السقوط في الطريق ليس فيه مايخجل، وأن الذين افلتوا يدك يومًا ما، لم يكونوا بالسحر الذي تظنه، وأنهم باهتون جدًا، ستنضج عندمًا تكف عن رثاء نفسك، و عندما تكف عن التباكي وعن إخبار نفسك كم هم سيئون وكم انت را…
ساقني الحديثُ معك، وما كُنتُ أعلمُ أن حديثًا عابرًا قد يُفضي بي إلى هذا المقام من التعلّق؛ وأن كلماتٍ قيلت على هامش الأيام، ستجد لها طريقًا خفيًا إلى القلب، ثم تستوطنه كأنها كانت تعرف موضعها منذ البدء.
أكنتُ أظنك عابرًا؟ أم كان في الأمر شيءٌ أبعد من ظني، شيءٌ رتبه القدر في صمت، حتى وجدتني، دون أن أشعر، أبحث عنك بين تفاصيل يومي، وأفتقد صوتك حين يغيب، وأجد في حديثك أنسًا لا يشبه سواه؟
أهذا ما كتبه لنا القدر، يا أنيس …
مرحبًا عزيزتي، ها انا عدت، ولكن ... ليس إليكِ. عدتُ مثقلًا بالجراح، وقد انقطع وصالكِ عني، بعد أن كنتِ أولَ مكانٍ لراحتي وأماني، مكانًا يداوي ويُربّت على جراحي. عدت، لكنني لم أعد إليكِ، فراقكِ كان حجرًا في قلبي، جعل مني شيئًا باردًا، بعد أن كنتُ مفعمًا بالحرارة والحياة. مرّت أيام لا تُعد، ولم أعد ألتفتُ للظلّ الذي خلفتِه، غادرتِني كأنني لم أكن، فعلمتُ نفسي أن أكون ... حتى بدونكِ. ضحكتي ما زالت تُولد من جراحي، وحديثي ص…
كنتُ أعلم أنك لست من نصبي، لم يكن الأمر حدسًا، بل كان يقينًا يسكنني كلما نظرتُ إليكَ. كنتُ أعرف أننا لن نقف يومًا في صالة عقدِ قرآن لنُعلن أن هذه الحياة ستبدأ معًا، وأن اسمينا لن يُكتبا في بيتٍ واحد، ولا في مستقبلٍ واحد. كنتُ أعلم أنا لن نشيخٍ معًا ولن يحمل أحدُنا ملامح الآخر في عينيه. وأن الأيام ستأخذ كلًا منا إلى جهةٍ لا يعرف فيها الآخر، ونمضي في الحياة كما لو أننا لم نلتق يومًا، بينما يبقى في القلب عمرُ كامل، لم ي…
أراك في كل جزءٍ من مخيلتي
تطوف بي أملًا عذبًا وتغشاني .
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @PilBB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PilBB edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 588,326 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
وظائف و تعيينات العراق 24 @iraqjobs24 · 46,783 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خيال،اقتباسات،عبارات،رسائل،حب،فراق،حزن،ايجابية،حبيبي،حبيبتي،بنات،قروب،كروب” (@PilBB), 35,162 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PilBB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
