Channel
@PilBB
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,963subscribers
-1,844 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370578112 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PilBB |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PilBB |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 33,963 | -23 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 33,986 | -27 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 34,013 | -22 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 34,035 | -38 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 34,073 | -52 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 34,125 | -106 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 34,231 | -118 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 34,349 | -191 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 34,540 | -135 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 34,675 | -62 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 34,737 | -55 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 34,792 | -47 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 34,839 | -66 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 34,905 | -56 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 34,961 | -118 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 35,079 | -43 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:44 | 35,122 | -40 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 35,162 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 35,184 | -39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 35,223 | first reading |
98 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 98 (23 June 2026 – 16 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,371 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
54 reactions across 33 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 74.1% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 25.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لم اصل الى ما تمنيت : بنبغي أن يولد المرء في هذا العالم سعيدًا، ومحبًا لكل شيء. لكن في الواقع، نادرًا ما تسير الأمور على هذا النحو. أمّا أنا، فقد قضيت حياتي أسعى جاهدًا للوصول إلى تلك الحالة، أن أصبح شخصًا يطمئن إلى الحياة ويحبها دون خوف ويعيش فيها دون أن يشعر أن عليه أن يقاتل طوال الوقت. ويا لخيبة الأمل، رغم مشقة الطريق كله، لم أصل إلى ما تمنيت. ومع ذلك لم أعد في المكان الذي بدأت منه، ولم أعد الشخص نفسه الذي انطلق ف…
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
أقسى ما في الظلام أن ترى النور ولا تستطيع بلوغه. أن تعرف تمامًا ما الذي كان يمكن أن يُنقذك، ثم تجد نفسك عاجزًا عن الوصول إليه. أن ترى الحياة مستمرّةً من حولك، والناس يضحكون، والأيام تمضي، والفرص تأتي وتذهب، بينما أنت عالقٌ في مكانٍ لا يراه أحد. وليس كلُّ من صمتَ مرتاحًا، ولا كلُّ من ابتعدَ لم يعد يريد شيئًا. أحيانًا يبتعد الإنسان لأنّه لم يعد يملك الطاقة الكافية ليعود كما كان. يظلّ ينظر إلى الأشياء التي كان يحبّها، إ…
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
لا حروب بيننا، أنا لا أكره من أحببتُ يومًا ولا أحتاج إلى أن أكرهك كي أستطيع الابتعاد عنك. لكنني لا أغفر لك ما فعلت، ولا أعيدك إلى المكانة التي كنت تحتلها في قلبي. فما حدث لم يُنهِ ما بيننا فحسب بل غير شيئًا في نظرتي إليك، وجعل العودة إلى ما كنا عليه أمرًا لا أريده، حتى لو أصبح ممكنًا. لن أسيء إليك، ولن أحمل نفسي عبء الانتقام منك لكن لن أتظاهر بأن شيئًا لم يحدث ولن أمنحك من جديد مكانًا لم أعد أطمئن إلى وجودك فيه. سأتر…
❤1
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
والحيرة كلّ الحيرة، أن تُحاول في كلّ مرة، وتبدّل الطرق، وتغيّر المسالك، ثم تنتهي في كل مرة إلى النتيجة ذاتها، كأن السنوات تمضي، وأنت واقف في المكان نفسه. حتى أضنى المحاولةَ القلب، وأتعب العقل، وأصاب الجسدَ خمولٌ يشبه الاستسلام. وبدأت بوادر الإحباط تتسرّب إلى عروقك في هدوء، حتى غدا الأمل نفسه يحتاج إلى من يواسيه. ولعلّ أقسى ما في الأمر أن تدرك، بعد كل هذا السعي، أن ما تريده قد لا يكون لك، مهما اجتهدت في بلوغه، ومهما أ…
❤1
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
وأبقى أسيرًا لصاحب الكلمة الطيبة، والابتسامة التي نكتمل بها ملامح الطمأنينة؛ لذلك الذي يفهمني دون أن أتحدث، ويقرأ ما أشعر به من نظرة عيني، فلا أحتاج أمامه إلى شرح التفاصيل، ولا إلى تبرير ما يسكن في داخلي، لأنه يفهمني كما أنا، دون سؤال، ودون مبررات. إنهم أولئك الأشخاص الذين نشعر بقربهم براحة لا تُوصف، شخصيات نلتقي بها في العمر مرة أو مرتين، ثم تمضي بنا الأيام بعيدًا عنهم، فيختفون من المشهد، لكنهم لا يختفون من القلب. ن…
❤2
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
أعرف ما معنى أن يحب المرء شخصًا بعيدًا كل البعد عنه، ما معنى أن يُحبّه كل يوم أكثر رغم الآميال والمسافات، رغم كل شيء، حتى ولو كان في الجهة الأخرى من العالم .
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
أتمنى أن تظل عالقًا بي ولا تنسيك الأيام بهجة قلبي معك ولا تمحي الطرقات صوت أملي فيك أن تبقى عالقًا بي كما لو أن هذا المكان مكانك الوحيد.
❤1
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
أنا حقًا لا أستطيع أن أجعل شيئًا ما يخصك عاديًا، لا أستطيع أن أصُد قلبي عن أشيائك، لا أستطيع صرف الإنتباه عن أدق تفاصيلك حتى تلك التي ترهقني.
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
بعض الحكايات تنتهي فصولها في مرحلةٍ من العمر، لكنها تختار لها في القلب سكنًا لا ترحل عنه، وتبقى ما بقي من العمر، مهما تعاقبت السنوات وبلغ الإنسان من النضج عتيًا. تظل عالقةً في الذاكرة بكل تفاصيلها؛ لا يغيّرها الزمن، ولا تمحوها الأيام، لأنها كانت تحمل في بداياتها شيئًا من البراءة، وكثيرًا من الصدق، ومعنى الرقة وجمال الشعور في أول ولادته. كانت قصةً قصيرة، لم يُكتب لها أن تكتمل في صفحات الحياة، لكنها اكتملت في القلب شعو…
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
أحيانًا، لا بدّ أن تُوهم الجميع بأن سفينتك تغرق، لا لأنك ضعيف، ولا لأنك استسلمت، بل لتكتشف من سيبقى واقفًا بجانبك حين تشتدّ الأمواج، ومن سيبحث عن أول قاربٍ للنجاة ويتركك خلفه. ففي لحظات الغرق تتساقط الأقنعة، ويظهر الصادق من العابر، والوفيّ من المصلحة، ومن كان وجوده معك حبًا حقيقيًا لا خوفًا من فقدان ما تقدّمه له. دعهم يظنون أن النهاية اقتربت، ودع الأيام تكشف لك وحدها من يستحق أن تُكمل معه الطريق؛ فليست العبرة بمن راف…
❤1
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
يصبح المرء ثرثارًا حين يكون مع من يحب، لا لأن لديه الكثير ليقوله، بل لأنه يجد أمامه الشخص الوحيد الذي يريد أن يقول له كل شيء. معك، لا أعرف كيف أصمت طويلًا؛ أخبرك عن يومي، عن فكرة عابرة مرّت في رأسي، عن شيء صغير أسعدني، وآخر أزعجني، ثعن تفاصيل لا تستحق أن تُحكى لأحد... لكنها تستحق أن تُحكى لك أنت. أحادّثك وكأنني أسترد معك كل الكلام الذي ادّخرته طويلًا، وكأن قلبي، حين يجدك، لا يعود يعرف كيف يخفي شيئًا. أطيل الحديث،…
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @PilBB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@PilBB edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وش المحتوى اللي استمر عليه
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خيّال .” (@PilBB), 33,963 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PilBB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.