10 measurements spanning 35 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,461–2,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 03:38
2,467
+4
6 Sept 2026, 12:01
2,463
-3
30 Aug 2026, 21:04
2,466
+1
27 Aug 2026, 12:38
2,465
+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:44
2,464
-4
20 Aug 2026, 16:36
2,468
-5
14 Aug 2026, 14:38
2,473
+1
11 Aug 2026, 07:17
2,472
-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:17
2,476
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:06
2,476
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,022 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
282
27.6%
👍
269
26.3%
💯
182
17.8%
❤
115
11.3%
🤣
92
9.00%
👏
20
1.96%
✍
18
1.76%
🤝
11
1.08%
😁
8
0.783%
🏆
7
0.685%
🤔
5
0.489%
⚡
4
0.391%
custom 5404431410972864937
3
0.294%
🤷♂
2
0.196%
👌
1
0.098%
👨💻
1
0.098%
🥰
1
0.098%
🫡
1
0.098%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,022 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PoperlyukovCEO. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Zero Human Company. Моя мечта.
Последние месяцы куда ни посмотри — все внедряют искусственный интеллект.
Но меня не покидает ощущение, что во многих компаниях средство постепенно начинает подменять цель.
Все чаще слышу:
«Нам поставили KPI по ИИ».
«Нужно срочно внедрять».
«Нас сравнивают с другими функциями».
При этом редко звучит главный вопрос.
«Какую проблему бизнеса мы вообще пытаемся решить?»
Сегодня, если н…
Кайфую от менторства.
В последнее время ко мне все чаще обращаются талантливые молодые руководители. Много беседуем. И почти на каждой встрече слышу одно и то же (хотя каждый формулирует это по-своему):
1️⃣Дайте больше полномочий.
2️⃣Повысьте в должности.
И каждый раз отвечаю примерно одинаково.
Власть не дают. Ее берут.
Но многие понимают эту фразу неправильно.
Я не про борьбу за кресло, аппаратные игры или и…
Вчера прочитал интересный whitepaper Кирилла Меньшова об AI-нативной разработке. Не со всеми выводами я согласен, но одна мысль показалась действительно сильной.
Конкуренция постепенно смещается с выбора модели на построение среды вокруг нее.
Еще год назад большинство обсуждений сводилось к вопросу: «Какую LLM выбрать?». Сегодня этот вопрос становится второстепенным.
Модели обновляются каждые несколько месяцев. То…
Возможно, этот пост покажется немного странным. Но он — от души. В отпуске появляется время остановиться, оглянуться назад и немного поразмышлять.
Этот канал я веду уже давно. За это время он сильно изменился. Сначала здесь было больше новостей и событий, потом постепенно он стал авторским.
Честно говоря, вести его регулярно не всегда просто. Но со временем я понял, ради чего это делаю.
Каждый раз, когда мне попад…
Недавно мне на глаза попался интересный пост одного талантливого коллеги.
Во многом я с ним согласен. Действительно, многие кэптивные компании сегодня сталкиваются с похожими проблемами: длинные сроки, размытая ответственность, слабая связь с бизнесом и тот самый корпоративный налог.
Всё это существует. Отрицать бессмысленно.
Но, на мой взгляд, проблема гораздо глубже, чем кажется на первый взгляд.
В последние го…
Немного пятничного юмора вам в ленту.
Кажется, рынок труда постепенно выходит на новый уровень зрелости.
Скоро в оффере будут не только ДМС, опционы и гибридный график, но и гарантия сохранности нервной системы 🤣
Всем отличной пятницы!
ИИ уже стандартизируют. А многие компании до сих пор спорят, можно ли пользоваться ChatGPT.
Project Management Institute выпустил первый международный стандарт применения искусственного интеллекта в управлении портфелями, программами и проектами.
Самое интересное в стандарте — какие принципы они считают обязательными.
Не скорость. Не выбор модели. И даже не промпт-инжиниринг. А совсем другие вещи.
1️⃣ИИ должен бы…
Вам кажется, что коллега или руководитель говорит бессмыслицу? Похоже, Вам не кажется.
Как-то я уже писал про корпоративное словоблудие, а недавно товарищ прислал интересное исследование на эту тему.
В нем говорится, что в офисах все чаще звучат фразы, похожие на заклинания для посвященных: «парадигма роста», «генерация смыслов», «синергетическое лидерство». Для одних это признак современного менеджмента, для други…
Сегодня — финал чемпионата мира: Испания против Аргентины.
Мой прогноз: Испания победит со счётом 2:1. Но матч точно будет максимально напряжённым — опыт и характер Аргентины против скорости и яркого футбола Испании.
🔥 — если вы за Испанию
👍 — если вы за Аргентину
UPD: Счёт, конечно, я не угадал, но главное предсказание сбылось — Испания стала чемпионом мира впервые за 16 лет! 🇪🇸🏆
Война башен
Иногда смотришь на взаимодействие коллег или родственных подразделений и видишь очень странную картину.
На общих встречах все за командность, синергию, общее дело и стратегические цели.
А потом начинается кулуарная часть.
Там уже другая реальность.
Там друг другу моют кости, вспоминают старые обиды, пересказывают истории, первопричины которых давно никто не помнит. Иногда уже и сам конфликт живет отде…
💯43🔥14👍8🤣4⚡2❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PoperlyukovCEO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А как вы защищаете своё внимание от операционной текучки?
Жестко делегирую и не влезаю в детали12%
Выделяю отдельные слоты под операционку22%
Фильтрую вопросы через команду/помощника18%
Пока плохо получается - все равно затягивает32%
Посмотреть ответы34%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АЗС «Газпромнефть» @gpnbonus · 49,415 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Газпром нефть @gazpromneft_official · 46,829 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Энергия+ | Онлайн-журнал @energyplusmedia · 69,136 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цифровой баррель” (@PoperlyukovCEO), 2,467 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PoperlyukovCEO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.