Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -40,952. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,047–135,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 17:24
46,619
-64
4 Nov 2026, 15:45
46,683
-46
3 Nov 2026, 13:05
46,729
-92
2 Nov 2026, 12:15
46,821
-51
1 Nov 2026, 15:26
46,872
-56
31 Oct 2026, 14:37
46,928
-1,266
30 Oct 2026, 17:06
48,194
-143
29 Oct 2026, 14:17
48,337
-64
28 Oct 2026, 11:25
48,401
-57
27 Oct 2026, 11:35
48,458
-18
26 Oct 2026, 13:01
48,476
-771
25 Oct 2026, 10:28
49,247
-190
24 Oct 2026, 11:44
49,437
-77
23 Oct 2026, 08:41
49,514
-62
22 Oct 2026, 05:56
49,576
-65
20 Oct 2026, 20:59
49,641
-21
19 Oct 2026, 18:18
49,662
-56
18 Oct 2026, 15:28
49,718
-24
17 Oct 2026, 17:07
49,742
-64
16 Oct 2026, 18:08
49,806
first reading
Engagement
126 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.21%
avg views ÷ 46,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
563
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 126 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
126 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
21,409
Reactions total
454
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 09:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,570
Videos
≈318
Links
≈1,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 43s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,800 reactions across 122 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
457
25.4%
🔥
447
24.8%
👍
261
14.5%
⚡
115
6.39%
😍
104
5.78%
👀
93
5.17%
🤩
64
3.56%
👏
48
2.67%
✍
44
2.44%
💯
43
2.39%
🎉
40
2.22%
🆒
34
1.89%
🏆
22
1.22%
😁
11
0.611%
👨💻
9
0.5%
👌
7
0.389%
🙏
1
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,823 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (2.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#ФотоДня
🖼 Перед вами не картина Клода Моне, а оренбургская степь с высоты птичьего полета. Здесь Европа встречается с Азией, а Россия — с Казахстаном.
🛢 В южной части региона в 1966 году открыли крупнейшее в Европе нефтегазоконденсатное месторождение. Добывать нефть здесь непросто: она скрывается в плотных известняках и доломитах, плохо пропускающих жидкости и газы. Поэтому специалисты применяют редкий газлифтный …
✍️ Эти профессии никогда не будут прежними…
🤖 Нейросети изменят рабочую рутину почти во всех сферах — так считают более 41 тысячи российских школьников. Причем электриков и грузчиков, по мнению подростков, ждут более заметные перемены, чем юристов и HR-специалистов.
🔎 Кому ИИ поможет больше всего и какие задачи он возьмет на себя? Загляните в будущее со спецпроектом «Карьерная карта — 2050»👈
💡 Щелчок выключателя — и комната наполняется светом. Одно касание — и кофемашина готовит любимый напиток. Мы привыкли, что дома электричество слушается каждого нашего движения. В мире сотен машин и механизмов эта невидимая сила требует совсем другого мастерства.
⚡️ Кто знает, как с ней справиться, смотрите в четвертом выпуске совместного видеопроекта «Энергии+» и медиалаборатории «Гигарама» «Действующие лица».
Пред…
👀 Почему опоры ЛЭП разной формы?
🤓 Одни силуэты напоминают карандаш, другие — елку, а третьи похожи на гигантского робота. Причина не в фантазии инженеров, а в задачах, которые выполняют эти конструкции.
💡 На ровной местности для прямых участков ЛЭП часто достаточно простых опор с одной стойкой. Другое дело — горы. Там линии электропередачи тянут через ущелья с помощью массивных и устойчивых башен.
⛓️ В районах, г…
#СловоДня
💎 Перовскит — редкий минерал, который дал название целому семейству синтетических материалов. Благодаря особому расположению атомов в кристаллической решетке природный перовскит хорошо поглощает свет и проводит электрический заряд. Ученые научились воспроизводить эту структуру и менять в ней одни химические элементы на другие, как детали конструктора. Так получают материалы с разными свойствами.
☀️ Сегодн…
😎 За что пластик получает приставку «супер»?
🥤 Нефть и газ служат сырьем для производства самых разных пластиков. Одни из них легко гнутся, другие выдерживают удар, третьи — сильный нагрев. Эти свойства зависят в том числе от того, как устроены длинные цепочки молекул внутри материала.
✈️ Особенно далеко эта настройка зашла у суперконструкционных пластиков — их еще называют высокоэффективными. От обычных они отлича…
🔗 Семь фамилий технического прогресса
В предыдущем посте мы подготовили для вас филворд, посвященный знаменитым инженерам и изобретателям. Поздравляем тех, кто нашел все фамилии и отметился молнией ⚡️
Раскрываем имена героев нашей головоломки! 👇
🔹 Иван Кулибин — создал самоходную повозку и карманные часы с мини-театром внутри.
🔹 Иван Ползунов — разработал двухцилиндровый паровой двигатель.
🔹 Ефим и Мирон Черепанов…
🚀 Кто заставил мир двигаться?
🧰 Сегодня в России День инженера-механика. Представители этой профессии создают и совершенствуют машины, двигатели и сложные механизмы — от часовых шестеренок до турбин электростанций.
✍️ Мы зашифровали в филворде фамилии знаменитых инженеров и изобретателей, чьи разработки вошли в историю. Задачка со звездочкой: слов — семь, а инженеров — восемь. Ответ опубликуем завтра 😉
Голосуйте р…
Робота прихлопнули мухобойкой, но это его не остановило😱
🦋 Ученые Калифорнийского университета опубликовали в международном научном журнале Science Robotics результаты работы над миниатюрным летающим роботом массой всего 185 миллиграммов. Устройство напоминает бабочку, но точно может поспорить с ней в «живучести». Механизм выдержал удары и сжатие нагрузкой, в 11 тысяч раз превышающей его собственный вес.
⚡️ Секрет …
🔥4❤2👍2👏2👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @energyplusmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@energyplusmedia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Газпром нефть @gazpromneft_official · 48,813 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
220 технологий @tech_220 · 39,298 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Фон @fon_tech · 216,581 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
Экология | Энергетика | ESG @ecologia_i_energetika · 57,593 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Энергия+ | Онлайн-журнал” (@energyplusmedia), 46,619 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/energyplusmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.