Channel
@Pro_Troll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
502subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001096167352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pro_Troll |
| Created | 3 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pro_Troll |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 502 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 499 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 500 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 500 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,006 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
130 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 44 | 33.8% | |
| 🤬 | 24 | 18.5% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 13.8% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 11.5% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 6.92% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 3.85% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 3.08% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.769% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нє, ну а хулі. Прикольно виходити протестувати зараз, коли тепло, а тебе не мають наміру відпиздити мусора та тітушня й залити газом. Дуже комфортно протестувати. От тільки не порівнюйте це з майданом. Це не порівнювані історії. Бо сьогодні це не протести, а звичайна дурість.
💯6👍1
Протестувальники, нагадаємо вам, що в країні війна. Ганьбище якесь. Позвикали собі ідолів та кумирів створювати і готові ризикувати заради них країною.
💯5👍2🤔1
Уті путі. А чого фермери не допомогли чотирьом F-16, які летіли просто подивитись на кацапську ракету (збити її навіть не спробували), та не перекрили кордон і не заборонили Х-ламу проліт? Клоуни. Це вам не на історії спекулювати.
💯4🤡4
Кожен день чергові підтвердження: у Польщі не українці, а тєрпіли. Ляхам теж не радимо розслаблятись. Бо в один момент ви дуже пошкодуєте за кожне криве слово чи дію по відношенню до України. Але буде запізно.
👍3💯3
Поки в нас прогресивне суспільство розмірковує хто як служить, де є правильні та не правильні підрозділи , здійснюючи поради з тилу як треба робити (не їм самим в жодному разі). На окупованих територіях Запоріжжя продовжують мобілізовувати місцеве населення, яке вже завтра матиме намір це прогресивне суспільство вирізати та зґвалтувати, але важкий хліб на себе візьмуть не сили «демократичних» цінностей, а ті кому пр…
🤬2😐2💯1
Ганьбище. І як зі сторони тих, хто з палатками у метро, так і зі сторони тих, хто зараз когось кудись не пускає. Піднімайте тих, хто лежить і стоячи чекайте, зате живі! Чергове підтвердження, що за 4,5 роки війни Кличко зі своїми мародерами ніхера не зробив для безпеки киян у питанні укриттів. Чорти-мародери.
💯7🤬2
Ганебну картину спостерігаємо в Києві. В переповнене метро не пускають людей, тому що вже немає місця. Згідно офіційних даних, Київ запланував створити 44 підземних укриття для закладів освіти, які не мали сховищ. За три роки побудували 9, але з них доступне лише ОДНЕ. Інші ще не введені в експлуатацію. Зате Кличко відкрив новий сквер біля КПІ, мабуть, щоб там могли сидіти кияни, яким не вистачило місця в метро.
🤬7
❗️Повідомляємо, що 29 липня 2026 року було втрачено зв’язок із винищувачем F-16 Повітряних Сил Збройних Сил України. На одному з напрямків фронту пілот виконував бойове завдання із перехоплення повітряних цілей противника. За попередніми даними на борту літака сталась нештатна ситуація, льотчик був змушений катапультуватися. Наразі пілот у повній безпеці, його успішно евакуйовано та доставлено до лікувального заклад…
😢4🙏2🕊1
Помилка №2.
💯4🙈1
утро доброе на ночь будет повышенная угроза массированного обстрела повышенная угроза для Киева и Киевской области, для остальных регионов угроза меньше будут пытаться давить крылатыми и баллистическими ракетами более детально по целям и так далее сообщу после вероятных вылетов страт. петухов
🤬4😢4
Важливо.
👍6🫡1
– В які азартні ігри ви граєте? – Продовжую жити в Києві! 🤓
😁4💯2👀1🤣1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Pro_Troll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,065,453 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПрофіТроль” (@Pro_Troll), 502 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pro_Troll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.