Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net -551. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,868–10,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 16:01
10,078
-5
5 Nov 2026, 15:36
10,083
-5
4 Nov 2026, 15:40
10,088
-2
3 Nov 2026, 15:19
10,090
-10
2 Nov 2026, 18:29
10,100
-4
1 Nov 2026, 19:08
10,104
+3
31 Oct 2026, 20:30
10,101
+3
30 Oct 2026, 17:35
10,098
-1
29 Oct 2026, 18:19
10,099
+9
28 Oct 2026, 20:18
10,090
+27
27 Oct 2026, 16:16
10,063
-5
26 Oct 2026, 17:46
10,068
+16
25 Oct 2026, 15:35
10,052
+2
24 Oct 2026, 19:07
10,050
-7
23 Oct 2026, 20:17
10,057
+19
22 Oct 2026, 20:51
10,038
+22
21 Oct 2026, 20:49
10,016
+22
18 Oct 2026, 12:21
9,994
-7
17 Oct 2026, 14:50
10,001
+34
14 Oct 2026, 13:46
9,967
first reading
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.0%
avg views ÷ 10,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,620
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 112 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
112 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
101,450
Reactions total
3,169
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 21:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,000
Videos
≈1,300
Links
≈1,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 56s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,574 reactions across 110 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,878
36.7%
👍
1,609
15.2%
🫡
1,421
13.4%
🔥
1,148
10.9%
😁
924
8.74%
🤬
852
8.06%
😢
213
2.01%
👏
150
1.42%
🤝
114
1.08%
🤔
65
0.615%
👎
64
0.605%
🤯
49
0.463%
🥰
45
0.426%
😱
34
0.322%
🙏
8
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (6.90%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Тільки не показуйте це активістам в тік-току
«“Виживали за рахунок овочів. В нас така була дієта овочева. Нічого не було. Але як там пишуть, що ми ще мишей їли. Я не знаю хто це їв…”, – каже вона і на питання, чи їли люди собак, стверджує, що це неправда.
“Ви знаєте, от “товарищі” їли. Оті отстріляли всіх собак на посьолку (Житлоселище, – МОСТ). Бо дійсно їх так загнали в підвали, що вони не могли вийти навіть”, – …
Командування РО ССпО ЗСУ запустило інтерактивної онлайн-карти дій Руху опору на тимчасово окупованих територіях України.
Новий цифровий ресурс створено для систематизації даних про активні дії осередків українського підпілля. На карті відмічаються місця здійснення успішних акцій партизанів: від ліквідації топових колаборантів і військових злочинців до пошкодження залізничних шляхів, складів боєприпасів та об'єктів в…
Забрали золото та срібло на території побратимів.
Команда Інституту ВМС та збірна Військово-Морських Сил посіли перше й друге місця на баскетбольному турнірі Десантно-штурмових військ ЗСУ.
На майданчику — та сама наполегливість, швидкість і характер, що й на службі. Жодних піддавків, жорстка боротьба за кожен підбір і максимальна віддача до фінальної секунди.
Дякуємо воїнам ДШВ за організацію, високий рівень змага…
Колаборанти та зрадники Ларина та Беляков з Кінбурнської Коси здається стали розуміти, що єдина надія на порятунок є звернення до Штатів.
«освободітелі» «своїх» залишили та навіть користуючись припиненням вогню по всій ділянці, місцевих ніхто не евакуйовував.
До повномасштабного вторгнення Ларіна та Беляков мали на Кінбурні базу відпочинку, хлібопекарню, вели бізнес -наразі втратили все🤷♂️
В ОП переграли з створенням партій «миру» , які мають зайняти електоральне поле «опзж» ітд.
Переграли з контрольованими фігурами гончаренок та їм подібних розраховуючи розкласти яйця в різні кошики, бо створюють преценденти безкарності та безвідповідальності за характерні деструктивні дії для державності.
Я не вірю в стратегеми Давіда Арахамії та всіх інших архітекторів цих політичних проектів, проте чітко знаю до ч…
Репости кобили, яка вчора падала на коліна та викликала багато емпатії у опортуністів натхнених «демократією»
Саме вона була першоджерелом про «катівню», саме вона є типу «медиком»(насправді ні) і саме вона через соцмережі збирала людей.
К.О. мав не діалоги з нею вести, а СБ малоб ще вчора опрацювати цей матеріал бо її соц мережі ведуть підривний характер не перший день
Що там «київський режим» будуть блять хоч колись зроблені висновки якісь? Чи ми знову будемо своє електоральне поле захищати!? Ви визначтесь вже ми про державу чи про «майбутні вибори»?
Коли ми вже побачимо чіткі дії держави по захисту військових та коли будуть не популярні ,але потрібні реформи мобілізації!?
Допизди ваші міністерства єдності ітд, наводьте порядок або потім не пиздіть про розʼєднане суспільство в м…
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @ze_bg1920. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nord Division @norddivision11 · 45,269 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Airborne Division @airborne1126 · 27,617 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
Ukrainian Special Military @ukrainianspecialmilitary · 18,754 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
Сергій Філімонов @FilimonovGonor · 32,853 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
Той самий Кухарчук @SlipioCkUa · 25,054 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
✙ ATF•Anti Terror Force @atfcrew · 22,200 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
Хроники Ридика 🫡 @hroniki_radika · 23,378 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
МикВісті @nikvesti · 45,566 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
WarArchive @WarArchive_ua · 51,470 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
APATTA Community @ArattaCommunity · 19,796 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
Muchnoy ✙ Jugend @muchnoyjugend88 · 40,114 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Мультличности @Multlichnosti_1 · 63,883 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
Я - ШТУРМОВИК ✙ @datsik5 · 24,820 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Соняшник🦅 @soniah_hub · 42,131 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
ПН | Преступности.НЕТ @newspn · 102,677 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України @ua_dshv · 35,050 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
МОСТ: ХЕРСОН @mostks · 22,416 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Kherson DRON @Kherson_DRON · 20,243 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
Куди піти? | Миколаїв ✨ @Mykolaiv_to_go · 20,214 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
Позивний Каппа @KappaHimera · 51,628 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
Південь ™ @mediapivden · 192,957 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Вознесенський Вісник @vozvisnyk · 57,482 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Правдивый Николаев @pravdivy_nikolaev · 27,400 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Алексапольський Святослав Миколайович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…посмертно присвоєно звання молодшого лейтенанта{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ze_bg1920/3842|title=Герою України Святославу Алексапольському присвоєно…” read 1 November 2026
Зелінський Ілля Володимирович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…ite=YouTube|publisher=Ілля Зелінський}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ze_bg1920/1114|title=Сьогодні на місце скандальної забудови вчергове викликано…” read 1 November 2026
Клепіков Олександр Сергійович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…під час [[Бої за Миколаїв|оборони Миколаєва]]{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/ze_bg1920/5564 |title=На вулицях столиці з'явилось графіті на честь Святослава…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗЕ_БГ✙ 🏴” (@ze_bg1920), 10,078 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ze_bg1920.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.