Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⭕️ Зайканал ⭕️

Channel

⭕️ Зайканал ⭕️

@military_u

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

400subscribers

-12,247 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001606733727
TypeChannel
Username@military_u
Created9 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/military_u

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

40013,1686,7846 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,647 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,644 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,636 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,632 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,631 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,627 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,625 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,623 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,616 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,611 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,597 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,590 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,591 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,579 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,576 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,572 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,566 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,562 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,552 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,550 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,546 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,537 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,525 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,516 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,508 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,544 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,541 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,586 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,687 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,820 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,833 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,825 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,814 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,801 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,792 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,798 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,795 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,837 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,855 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,843 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,873 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,885 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,905 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,923 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,943 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,972 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,967 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,983 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,004 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,048 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,047 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,111 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,118 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,168 subscribers7 November 2026 — 400 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net -12,247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:57400-12,768
6 Nov 2026, 09:1513,168+50
5 Nov 2026, 08:1513,118+7
4 Nov 2026, 11:0513,111+64
3 Nov 2026, 07:5813,047-1
2 Nov 2026, 10:0613,048+44
1 Nov 2026, 09:2013,004+21
31 Oct 2026, 07:1612,983+16
30 Oct 2026, 09:4612,967-5
29 Oct 2026, 11:5812,972+29
28 Oct 2026, 07:2812,943+20
27 Oct 2026, 07:2912,923+18
26 Oct 2026, 06:2112,905+20
25 Oct 2026, 04:0612,885+12
24 Oct 2026, 03:2812,873+30
23 Oct 2026, 04:2012,843-12
22 Oct 2026, 02:0112,855+18
20 Oct 2026, 23:3012,837+42
19 Oct 2026, 23:5612,795-3
18 Oct 2026, 22:4012,798first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
598.3%
avg views ÷ 400 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held70 (22 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total67,010
Reactions total2,198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 06:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 37s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,428 reactions across 70 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,17440.1%
💯1,45026.7%
👍1,15821.3%
🫡3546.52%
👎2174.00%
custom 5381936060198564239751.38%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,330 views79 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ukrpravda_newsPhoto

🏃‍♂️ Львівський псевдоактивіст Остап Стахів, якого нещодавно затримали на вулиці та мобілізували на військову службу, записав відео та заявив, що "втік від викрадачів". "Я не вважаю себе мобілізованим. Я не був мобілізований. Я не визнаю їхню ВЛК, жодні їхні дії – це все беззаконня. Я доведу це в судовому порядку", – каже Стахів на відео. Він заявив, що не підлягає мобілізації через підозру у вчиненні кримінальних …

😁71👎5👍3

4 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,220 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вирішив загуглити, що це за мексиканець такий, який тримав на зарплаті генерал-майора СБУ та інших високопосадовців. І перше, що я побачив — це тіп, який бодався в інтернеті зі Щадилом. Якщо ви знаєте, був оцей Дядя Мопс оця купка дебілоїдів АУЄшних, наркомани всякі які стріми крутили на ютубі. Виявляється, він із ними бодався в прямих ефірах на всякі АУЄшні теми, під наркотою щось кричав, погрожував, навіть підпал…

😁53💯22🫡9👍7

4 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,500 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @nab_ukraine

👤👤👤👤 Операція «Карфаген»: викрито нову злочинну організацію👥 НАБУ і САП викрили злочинну організацію, учасники якої налагодили систематичне надання неправомірної вигоди високопосадовцям правоохоронних органів за безперешкодну діяльність шахрайських колцентрів та інших незаконних бізнесів. Організатором був раніше неодноразово засуджений чоловік, який залучив до злочинної діяльності чинних високопосадовців СБУ, Офіс…

🫡23👍8custom 53819360601985642391

4 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,970 views71 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ситуація на американському фронті

😁66custom 53819360601985642394👎1

4 Nov 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,100 views113 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Трамп в ефірі Fox News визнав що причиною зростання цін на бензин стала війна в Ірані. Красава, ще більше треба було пиздіти американцям щоб закопати свою партію, а не говорити як є і тиснути на Україну.

💯89😁24

4 Nov 2026, 06:54 UTC≈2,120 views132 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Знатно республіканці через Трампа пососали на виборах.

😁81💯51

3 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,670 views71 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @torontotv

Posted without readable text

👍44💯21👎5😁1

3 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈2,640 views95 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁94👎1

3 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,970 views106 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @pekhno_newsVideo

Тези від очевидця вчорашніх подій в Петропавлівській Борщагівці вчора, журналіста Радіо Свобода Мар'яна Кушніра: Я сьогодні висвітлював події на Петропавлівській Борщагівці. І я вже вдруге приймаю гарячий душ, щоб відмитися. Ні, не від яєць, які жбурляли в усі боки. Ні, не від газу, яким задули нацгвардійців й інших людей. А від ситуації. Хочеться вимити з себе весь той бруд, у якому я побував. Що трапилося всеред…

🫡60👍31😁8👎6custom 53819360601985642391

2 Nov 2026, 21:51 UTC≈2,460 views173 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Як би це дивно не звучало, але в деяких моментах я заздрю росіянам, які можуть розігнати натовп і ніхто навіть не ризикне відкривати свого рота. Сьогодні ми вкотре стали свідками того, як натовп півнів вирішив, що він може десь щось качнуть, а система без яєць проковтнула все. Повторююсь, ми виживаємо. Мобілізаційні заходи необхідні. Можна багато сперечатися, але факт залишається фактом - без мобілізації в тому чи …

💯116👎41👍15😁1

2 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC≈2,180 views109 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @growler_party

Хуже охлократии быть не может ничего. Когда ебаная обезьяна с нулевым интеллектом оскорбляет боевых офицеров, которые не боятся брать на себя ответственность в сложные для государства года - это полный аут и окончательный путь в никуда. Даже если это и было по незнанию, работа должна быть адресной и ответственность должны разделить абсолютно все кто принимал участие в этом нападении, без какого либо исключения.

💯98👎6😁4👍1

2 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,160 views45 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ShrikeNewsPhoto

🇺🇸 Уже завтра выборы в Сенат США! RCP на своей карте сделали два изменения: вернули Небраску из серых в красные, а Миннесоту перевели из серых в синие. ▪️Таким образом, стартовый счет 47:45 в пользу демов, а в 8 штатах ситуация неопределенная. ▪️Для получения большинства (51 место) демам нужно выиграть в 4 из этих 8 спорных штатов: Первое число - разница в опросах, второе - ставки на Полимаркете. Д - дем, Р - рес…

👍41custom 53819360601985642393😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @military_u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AZERBAIJANI ARMED FORCES 24/7
@military_az · 23,733
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
НІП «Тиск»
@TyskNIP · 29,539
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⭕️ Зайканал ⭕️” (@military_u), 400 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/military_u.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.