Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психологическое счастье

Channel

Психологическое счастье

@Psychologicalhappiness

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,506subscribers

-139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001469092985
TypeChannel
Username@Psychologicalhappiness
Created1 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Psychologicalhappiness

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,50613,64513,575.56 August 2026 — 13,645 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,645 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,641 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,635 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,631 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,626 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,618 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,609 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,601 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,594 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,590 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,591 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,594 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,595 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,594 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,588 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,583 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,587 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,588 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,583 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,578 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,575 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,567 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,568 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,557 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,551 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,533 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,518 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,514 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,512 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,506 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,485–13,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:5813,506-6
15 Sept 2026, 09:0113,512-2
13 Sept 2026, 19:0013,514-4
11 Sept 2026, 22:3713,518-15
9 Sept 2026, 13:5613,533-18
6 Sept 2026, 07:5713,551-6
4 Sept 2026, 01:4013,557-11
2 Sept 2026, 12:3413,568+1
1 Sept 2026, 13:4313,567-8
31 Aug 2026, 15:3513,575-3
30 Aug 2026, 17:2513,578-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:0213,583-5
28 Aug 2026, 12:3613,588+1
27 Aug 2026, 12:4213,587+4
26 Aug 2026, 11:2913,583-5
25 Aug 2026, 11:4413,588-6
24 Aug 2026, 09:3613,594-1
21 Aug 2026, 05:5513,595+1
20 Aug 2026, 04:4313,594+3
19 Aug 2026, 06:3413,591first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.70%
avg views ÷ 13,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
365
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held26 (21 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total730
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

783 reactions across 26 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39049.8%
😁21126.9%
💯617.79%
🔥445.62%
💔344.34%
❤‍🔥151.92%
👍70.894%
🥰60.766%
😢40.511%
🤔40.511%
20.255%
👏20.255%
👻20.255%
👎10.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Psychologicalhappiness. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:43 UTC287 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Последний день приговорённого к смерти В отпуске я часто начинаю читать художественную литературу, которая долгое время лежит в закладках, но до неё всё никак не доходят руки. Этот отдых не стал исключением: я махом прочитал произведение Гюго «Последний день приговорённого к смерти». Раньше я читал нечто похожее у Набокова — «Приглашение на казнь», но это было уже три года назад, поэтому мне было интересно увидеть

💔6❤‍🔥32🤔2

31 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC443 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну что ж, вот и закончился мой небольшой отпуск, да и в целом летняя пора. Так символично получается, что именно этот пост я решил выложить под самый конец лета. По фотографии можно легко понять, чем я занимался и где вообще проводил время в свой небольшой отпуск. Курочка на фото, кстати, передаёт вам привет. 😅 Поэтому я снова возвращаюсь в рабочий режим: начинаю активно консультировать клиентов и вести канал, кото

28👍2🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC969 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мем посвящается людям с расстройствами настроения 😁

😁30💯106

13 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,030 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Счастье можно найти даже в самые тёмные времена, если не забывать обращаться к свету. Дж. К. Роулинг, «Гарри Поттер и узник Азкабана»

33

11 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,070 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Палитра эмоций Если вы хотя бы немного интересуетесь психологией, то прекрасно знаете, что чувства и эмоции занимают в ней если не первое, то очень важное место. И это вовсе неслучайно — сейчас разберёмся, почему именно так. Чувства и эмоции — это, пожалуй, лучший ориентир в нашей психике, который подсказывает, что с нами происходит: нравится нам то или иное событие, и если нравится — то как именно, а если не нрави

20🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,030 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Увы, но это даже не похоже на мем 😢

💔28💯13😢42

5 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,160 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Самое главное — не терять себя, даже когда всё вокруг меняется. Эрих Мария Ремарк

23💯4🔥4

3 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Быть психотерапевтом — значит быть одиноким кочевником, Богом, неудачником, Сатаной, чувствовать угрозу, быть предметом страстной любви и ненависти и задавать себе вопросы. Наша работа постоянно расстраивает нас, потому что мы всегда неуверенны, постоянно встречаемся с сопротивлением тех, кому хотим помочь, успех наш никогда не бывает полным, а неудачи отчетливы до навязчивости. Самая лучшая работа часто не видна даж

18❤‍🔥2💯2

1 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC≈1,150 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Это даже не мем, а личная боль многих из нас, особенно тех, у кого диагностирован СДВГ 🧠

😁30❤‍🔥54👻2

30 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,270 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Все счастливые семьи похожи друг на друга, каждая несчастливая семья несчастлива по-своему. Лев Толстой

20💯4

28 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈1,220 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Впихнуть невпихуемое В жизни часто так бывает, что мы пытаемся выстроить наш день или даже целую жизнь так, будто впихиваем в огромный чемодан кучу вещей, а он всё никак не может закрыться. Но многие делают это настолько упорно, что даже не замечают: чемодан не только не закрывается, он уже переполнен и скоро сломается. Например, я часто встречал в своей жизни людей, которые строили очень мощную карьеру, отдавая ей

22

24 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,070 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Хотя совсем необязательно, что это должен быть именно кот 😁

😁258🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Psychologicalhappiness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

0% токсичности
@stop_toxic · 34,444
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Доктор Курпатов
@kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,197
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Психология
@PsyEducation · 59,345
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Критическое мышление
@ThinkCritical · 47,239
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психологическое счастье” (@Psychologicalhappiness), 13,506 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psychologicalhappiness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.