Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PUA BLACK

Channel

PUA BLACK

@PuaBlack

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,405subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001897263460
TypeChannel
Username@PuaBlack
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PuaBlack

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3803,4053,392.515 August 2026 — 3,380 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,380 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,382 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,385 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,391 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,390 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,395 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,396 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,402 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,403 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,405 subscribers15 August 202616 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,376–3,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:373,405+2
12 Sept 2026, 13:573,403+1
8 Sept 2026, 17:013,402+6
3 Sept 2026, 02:143,396+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:473,395+5
27 Aug 2026, 09:133,390-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:383,391+6
21 Aug 2026, 09:573,385+3
18 Aug 2026, 12:553,382+2
15 Aug 2026, 15:333,380no change
15 Aug 2026, 02:153,380first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14148.3%
😁9231.5%
289.59%
👍237.88%
🍾82.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC368 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

دلیل عدم فعالیت این چند وقت اخیرم هم همین سفر بود ، وقتی برگردم کار های مهمی داریم ...

🔥115👍1

Signed Soroush Radan

10 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC369 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

هیچ چیز لذت‌بخش تر از این نیست که بیای سفر ، اپروچ بزنی ، دختره ساکنِ بغل هتل خودت باشه 😂 پی‌نوشت : بین دو پیام که خط سفید کشیده شده ، تماس صورت گرفته ... حین تماس بهم گفت : سرت رو بیار بالا آوردم بالا ، دیدم داره دست تکون میده 😂

😁10🔥2👍1

Signed Soroush Radan

8 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC453 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC454 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026

دخترهای خوشگل توی شهرهای بزرگ، الان چه مستقیم چه غیرمستقیم، ماهانه بیشتر از ۱۰۰۰ بار از طرف مردا پیشنهاد سکس دریافت می‌کنن؛ چه توی اینترنت و فضای مجازی، چه توی بارها، توی خیابون و چه توی اکیپ‌ها و دورهمی‌های خودشون. اگه یه دختر یه پروفایل ساده اینترنتی داشته باشه، یکم توی شبکه‌های اجتماعی پلک بزنه و هفته‌ای دو بار هم بره بیرون، بهت قول شرف می‌دم حجم کیری که به سمتش سرازیر میشه، حتی از معروف‌ترین زن‌های تاریخ هم بیشتر

8👍1

3 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC715 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

این پست رو داخل چنل شخصیم گذاشته بودم اما فکر میکنم برای ساختن یک ذهنیت مردانه ، لازمش داری.

🔥92👍1

Signed Soroush Radan

3 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC589 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @RadanSoroush

شخصا "به هرچی فکر کنی ، جذبش میکنی" رو امیدِ واهی و یک نوع تَوهم میبینم ! اما فکر میکنم مغز اونقدری هوشمند هست که یک سری اطلاعاتِ آشنا رو مثل پازل کنارِ هم قرار بده و اتفاقِ آینده رو بهت الهام کنه ، شدیداً معتقدم. فرقِ ریزی دارن اما مرزِ توهم و واقع‌گرا بودن رو میسازن ...

👍10🔥43

Signed Soroush Radan

1 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC752 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

لایو کوتاهی برگزار کردم تعداد ممبر خوب بود آموزش کوتاهی میدم

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC831 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

مدام پروفایل عوض کردن ، یک رفتار دخترانه و بچگانه‌ای هستش و دور از مردگونگی به شمار میره ❌ پروفایل ، باید یک معرفی کلی از شما باشه ، نه کلکسیون عکس یا آلبومِ خاطرات شما ! 🥃🖤 @PuaBlack

🔥181

Signed Soroush Radan

31 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC908 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

فقط یک مرد حرفه‌ای متوجه میشه چرا دختری که بلده با دودِ قلیون حلقه بده بیرون ، دختر خوبی هست 😂 🥃🖤 @PuaBlack

😁15👍1🔥1

Signed Soroush Radan

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PuaBlack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mahyar | علم رابطه
@Maahyar_Ch · 42,266
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
DHV | ایده رابطه
@dhvmen · 26,418
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
روانشناسی سیاه🥷🏻
@ravantype · 22,716
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026
آموزش جذب زنان | دایان
@jazb_dokhtar · 23,995
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
روانشناسى زنان - محمد راد
@ravanezan · 106,564
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
روانشناسی تاریک | روان شناسی تاریک | روانشناسی سیاه | روان شناسی سیاه
@ravanshenasidark · 93,466
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
روانشناسی مردان - محمد راد
@ravanemard · 56,295
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
آکادمی حمید رضایی | روان‌شناسی کاربردی نسل امروز
@HamidRezaeiAcademy · 77,711
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PUA BLACK” (@PuaBlack), 3,405 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PuaBlack.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.