آموزش سلامت روان و رشد فردی برای نسل جدید
ADHD، اضطراب، رابطه، اعتیاد رفتاری، خودشناسی
آموزش علمی، ساده و واقعی
👇 شروع مسیر
🌐 hamidrezaei.com
👤 : @Warrior_admin
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net -5,889. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,239–81,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:26
75,122
-56
6 Nov 2026, 12:34
75,178
-31
5 Nov 2026, 12:30
75,209
-56
4 Nov 2026, 10:41
75,265
-47
3 Nov 2026, 08:29
75,312
-38
2 Nov 2026, 04:47
75,350
-38
1 Nov 2026, 03:07
75,388
-60
31 Oct 2026, 02:09
75,448
-62
29 Oct 2026, 22:57
75,510
-48
28 Oct 2026, 20:07
75,558
-44
27 Oct 2026, 22:00
75,602
-48
26 Oct 2026, 23:20
75,650
-48
25 Oct 2026, 20:48
75,698
-41
24 Oct 2026, 23:16
75,739
-50
23 Oct 2026, 20:07
75,789
-40
22 Oct 2026, 22:26
75,829
-68
21 Oct 2026, 16:41
75,897
-46
20 Oct 2026, 15:39
75,943
-68
19 Oct 2026, 13:57
76,011
-35
18 Oct 2026, 16:28
76,046
first reading
Engagement
230 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.21%
avg views ÷ 75,122 subscribers
Avg views / post
911
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 230 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
230 (31 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
13,663
Reactions total
185
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,120
Videos
≈711
Links
≈2,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 34m
Average length
15m 20s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,665 reactions across 206 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,255
75.4%
👍
228
13.7%
👌
115
6.91%
💔
24
1.44%
🍾
16
0.961%
🏆
14
0.841%
😈
13
0.781%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 210 of the 230 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (26.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
فرمان دوم: درد اجتنابناپذیره؛ اما رنج کشیدن انتخابیه! 😔
همه ما یه بازی خاص با خودمون راه میندازیم؛ اتفاقاً این بازی رو اونقدر خوب بلدیم که بیشترمون حتی متوجه نمیشیم داریم انجامش میدیم 🎭
بازی اینه: ما خودمون رو قانع میکنیم که میشه یه روز برای همیشه از شر تمام دردهای زندگی خلاص شد
مثلاً با خودمون میگیم: اگه با فلانی برم توی رابطه دیگه همه چی حله؛ اما نمیفهمیم که همین وارد رابطه شدن با کلی درد و رنج جدید همر…
فرمان اول : آدمها افتضاحن؛ تو سعی کن کمتر افتضاح باشی!
خودیاری مثبتگرا معتقده که همه انسانها ذاتاً فوقالعاده و بااستعدادن و فقط کافیه اجازه بدن نور درونشون بدرخشه تا دنیا رو به جای بهتری تبدیل کنن
اما خودیاری منفی یه واقعیت دیگه رو میپذیره: ما انسانها موجودات بهشدت ناقص و بههمریختهای هستیم
بذار حقیقت رو بهت بگم علم نشون داده که همه ما، هرکدوم به سبک خاص خودمون، یه مقدار توهم داریم ، همهمون اهمیت خودمون ر…
خب حالا خودیاری منفی چیه؟ 🤔
روشیه برای رشد فردی که بهجای تمرکز روی چیزهایی که حس خوبی بهت میدن، روی چیزهایی تمرکز میکنه که حس بدی بهت میدن ، چون واقعیت اینه که وقتی یاد میگیری چطور با احساسات بد کنار بیای، تازه میتونی احساس خوبی داشته باشی 🌱
خودیاری مثبتگرا معتقده همه ما آدمهای فوقالعادهای هستیم که برای کارهای بزرگ به دنیا اومدیم ✨
اما خودیاری منفی قبول میکنه که همهمون یهجورایی داغونیم و بهتره با این و…
بین، من میدونم دلت میخواد چی بشنوی ، میدونم دوست داری یکی بهت بگه همهچی درست میشه نه، حتی بهتر از اون! همهچی قراره محشر بشه، فوقالعاده بشه، اصلاً زندگیت قراره بترکونه! 💥
میدونم دوست داری بشنوی که همه درد و رنجهای زندگیت بالاخره یه روز تموم میشن 🕊 اینکه یه روز همه رؤیاهات به واقعیت تبدیل میشن اینکه تنها چیزی که بین تو و سرنوشت فوقالعادهت قرار گرفته، خودتی! (یا به قول امیرپارسا ناگهان نوبت تو میشود .…
راستش من اصلاً باور ندارم که زندگی ذاتاً معنی خاصی داشته باشه 🤷♂️، با این وجود، زندگیم هیچوقت تا این حد پر از هدف نبوده؟!!! 🎯
پوچگرایی بدجوری بدنام شده اما ببین، قرار نیست لزوماً چیز بدی باشه؛ اتفاقاً میتونه بهت قدرت بده 💪
چون وقتی هیچ دلیل کیهانیای برای انجام یه کار وجود نداره، یعنی هیچ دلیلی هم برای انجام ندادنش نیست 🚫 یعنی هیچ داوری اون بالا ننشسته، هیچ نمایشنامه از پیش نوشتهشدهای به اسم تو وجود نداره 📜 ه…
یه چیزی هست که باید بهش فکر کنی 🤔
عشق، پول و شهرت تو رو عوض نمیکنن؛ فقط همون چیزی که الان هستی رو تشدید میکنن
آدم بخشنده، بخشندهتر میشه
آدمی که پر از تزلزل و عدم امنیته، ناامنتر میشه 😰
آدم بینظم هم کلاً افسارش پاره میشه و میزنه جاده خاکی 🛣
رویات هر چی که هست، اینو بدون که قرار نیست بیاد و زندگیت رو برات درست کنه؛ فقط چیزایی که از قبل تو وجودت هست رو چند برابر میکنه 📈
همه میپرسن من چی میخوام؟ اما خیلی کم…
چند روز پیش یکی ماجرای (معمای هزارپا) 😘 رو برام تعریف کرد و به نظرم خیلی قشنگ توضیح میده که چرا ما با دست خودمون، کار خودمون رو خراب میکنیم.
داستان از این قراره: یه وزغ 🐸 از یه هزارپا 😘 میپرسه: تو از کجا میدونی کدوم پات رو باید بعد از اون یکی برداری؟
هزارپا جواب میده که تا حالا اصلاً به این موضوع فکر نکرده بوده؛ برای همین، وقتی شروع میکنه به راه رفتن، سعی میکنه حواسش رو جمع کنه که الان دقیقاً باید کدوم پاش …
دو نکته برای اینکه فقط بهشون فکر کنی 🤯:
وضعیت امروز بدن تو، بازتاب با تأخیر غذاهایی است که میخوری 🍎
دانش تو، بازتاب با تأخیر اطلاعاتی است که مصرف میکنی 📚
خوشحالی تو، بازتاب با تأخیر آدمهایی است که به آنها اهمیت میدهی ❤️
(اطلاعاتی که مصرف میکنی، همان خاکی است که افکار آیندهات در آن رشد میکنند) – جیمز کلیر
خوب بهش فکر کن ، ی سؤال که باید از خودت بپرسی: کدوم انتخابها دارن شخصیت آیندهی تو را شکل میدهن؟ 🤔
پیش…
تو سال ۱۹۸۲، ی پزشک ۳۱ ساله به نام بری مارشال عمداً خودش را مسموم کرد 🧪 بیست سال بعد، او به خاطر این کار برنده جایزه نوبل شد 🏆
مارشال که یک پزشک استرالیایی بود، به چیزی شک کرده بود: جامعه پزشکی کاملاً مطمئن بود که زخم معده ناشی از استرس و غذاهای تند هست اما مارشال که در نمونهبرداریهای معده، باکتری کشف کرده بود، نظر دیگه ای داشت 🩺 برای همین مقالهای نوشت و یافتههایش را به تفصیل شرح داد اما وقتی مارشال اون رو به ان…
همه میخوان خوشبخت بشن، ولی هیچکس نمیخواد هزینش رو بده! 💸
یکی از بزرگترین توهمات ما درباره خوشبختی اینه که فکر میکنیم میتونیم بدون از دست دادن چیزی، به چیزهایی که میخوایم برسیم 🤔
ما موفقیت میخوایم، ولی نمیخوایم شکست بخوریم 📉
رابطه عاطفی میخوایم، ولی نمیخوایم ریسک طرد شدن رو بپذیریم 💔
آزادی میخوایم، ولی از مسئولیت تصمیمهامون فرار میکنیم 🏃♂️
واقعیت اینه که هر چیزی که میخوای، یه قیمتی داره! 🏷
و این قیمت …
یه خبر بد: قرار نیست یه روزی همهچیز درست بشه! 🫠
احتمالا تو هم اینا رو هزار بار به خودت گفتی
فقط یه شغل خوب پیدا کنم همه چی حله 💼
فقط وارد یه رابطه بشم زندگیم روال میشه 👩❤️👨
فقط درامدم بیشتر بشه زندگیم میوفته رو غلتک 💸
ولی معمولاً وقتی به چیزی که میخواستی میرسی، بعد از یه مدت سروکله مشکلات جدید پیدا میشه!
پس شاید یکی از بزرگترین اشتباهات ما اینه که فکر میکنیم رشد فردی یعنی رسیدن به زندگیای که دیگه توش درد و …
چرا بعضیها با اینکه همهچیزشون خوبه، هنوز نمیتونن وارد یه رابطه بشن؟ 🤔
گاهی پیش میاد که با یکی میری سر قرار کلی حرف میزنید، میخندید، به نظر میاد همهچی عالی پیش رفته ☕️
اما بعدش اون آدم نه ازت خبری میگیره نه پیامی میده و نه هیچ چیز دیگه انگار کلا محو میشه 📵
و خب به خودت میگی مگه من چمه؟ شغل دارم، ظاهر بدی ندارم، آدم جالبیام، پس چرا هیچ رابطهای شکل نمیگیره؟
ببین شاید مشکل از چیزی باشه که هیچ وقت فکرش رو هم نم…
❤11👌2🏆1
Signed warrior_Admin
Showing the 12 most recent of 230 posts we hold for @HamidRezaeiAcademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@HamidRezaeiAcademy edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @HamidRezaeiAcademy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر مطمئن بودی لازم نیست به کسی ثابت کنی که ارزشمندی، احتمالاً کدوم چیز بیشتر تو رفتارت عوض میشد؟
کمتر دنبال تأیید و توجه بقیه میرفتم27%
راحتتر نه میگفتم و مرز میذاشتم18%
وقتی از کسی خوشم میاومد طبیعیتر و مستقیمتر رفتار میکردم30%
از ترس قضاوت یا رد شدن خودم رو محدود نمیکردم26%
بیشتر طبق خواسته و ارزشهای خودم زندگی میکردم30%
احتمالا همه کارای بالا رو انجام میدادم26%
نمیدونم واقعا16%
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
این هفته ای که گذشت کدوم یکی از این احسای زیر برات پررنگ تر از بقیه بودن؟
اضطراب38%
تنهایی38%
خستگی و بی حوصلگی51%
بی حسی29%
سگ سیاه افسردگی29%
The shares total 185%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
چند بار تا حالا تصمیم گرفتی که دیگه این بار انجامش نمیدی ولی چند ساعت یا چند روز بعد دوباره زیر تصمیمت زدی؟
اون لحظه فکر میکنی کدوم یکی از این اتفاقا افتاد؟
ته دلم واقعا نمیخواستم تغییر کنم 😏15%
واقعا میخواستم ولی اون لحظه ی چیزی درونم از تصمیم من خیلی قوی تر بود 😔91%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 230 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@HamidRezaeiAcademy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@drpsychoir named in 33 posts, 10 August 2026 – 2 October 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
رهایی | ترک پورنوگرافی @sakoye_rahai · 68,223 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
چجوری خودمو بشناسم؟! @ShakhsiatShenasii · 18,893 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 October 2026
تگ @Majaleh_Music · 192 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 August 2026
DHV | ایده رابطه @dhvmen · 25,977 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
بدنسازی اصولی @Badan_Ssazi · 58,594 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
مدرسه آنلاین آلا @alaa_sanatisharif · 45,065 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی حمید رضایی | روانشناسی کاربردی نسل امروز” (@HamidRezaeiAcademy), 75,122 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HamidRezaeiAcademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
