آموزش سلامت روان و رشد فردی برای نسل جدید
ADHD، اضطراب، رابطه، اعتیاد رفتاری، خودشناسی
آموزش علمی، ساده و واقعی
👇 شروع مسیر
🌐 hamidrezaei.com
👤 : @Warrior_admin
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -3,300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,216–81,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:59
77,711
-157
16 Sept 2026, 16:37
77,868
-128
14 Sept 2026, 22:00
77,996
-87
13 Sept 2026, 07:39
78,083
-151
11 Sept 2026, 07:18
78,234
-162
8 Sept 2026, 09:19
78,396
-198
5 Sept 2026, 06:42
78,594
-126
3 Sept 2026, 12:36
78,720
-92
2 Sept 2026, 09:47
78,812
-59
1 Sept 2026, 11:46
78,871
-48
31 Aug 2026, 14:47
78,919
-58
30 Aug 2026, 15:03
78,977
-73
29 Aug 2026, 17:57
79,050
-64
28 Aug 2026, 18:07
79,114
-91
27 Aug 2026, 21:24
79,205
-60
26 Aug 2026, 21:55
79,265
-73
25 Aug 2026, 23:05
79,338
-70
25 Aug 2026, 01:24
79,408
-79
23 Aug 2026, 13:58
79,487
-128
22 Aug 2026, 03:28
79,615
first reading
Engagement
178 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.782%
avg views ÷ 77,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
608
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.931%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 86 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
178 (31 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
52,291
Reactions total
452
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,080
Videos
≈708
Links
≈2,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 29m
Average length
19m 01s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,307 reactions across 160 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
965
73.8%
👍
181
13.8%
👌
100
7.65%
💔
24
1.84%
🍾
16
1.22%
😈
13
0.995%
🏆
8
0.612%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
احتمالاً شنیدی میفرمایند :«۹۰ روز پورن نبین، مغزت ریست میشه. 😄
ولی مغز دکمه Reset نداره که روز ۹۱ ناگهان به تنظیمات کارخانه برگرده.تا امروز شواهد معتبری نداریم که نشون بده ۹۰ روز یک مرز زیستی خاص برای ریکاوری مغزه.
یعنی نمیتونیم بگیم دقیقاً بعد از ۹۰ روز:
گیرندههای دوپامین «نرمال» میشن
ولع و میل ها تموم میشه
یا مشکلات مرتبط با پورن برای همه برطرف میشن.
تغییرات رفتاری و مغزی معمولاً تدریجیاند و سرعتشون بین آدم…
یکی از بچههای دژ توی گزارشش نوشته که از وقتی وارد چالش شده تا الان لغزش نداشته
اما برای من چیزی که مهم تر از لغزش داشتن یا نداشتنش بود این بود که فهمیده فشار کار و درس چطور میتونه اون رو به سمت این رفتار هل بده
خودش میگه تو این موقعیتها ذهنش سریع این بهونه ها رو میسازد :
اگر برم سمت این کار، فشار و عصبیت کمتر میشه
و بعد خودش یک مشاهده خیلی مهم داره:
این اتفاق اگر هم بیفتد، فقط برای چند ساعت حالمو خوب میکنه
یعنی …
دو هفته پیش، هر لغزش دو روز از زندگیش رو میگرفت.
خودش میگه بعد از هر بار، شروع میکرد به لعنت کردن خودش، هیچکدوم از کارهاش رو جلو نمیبرد و منتظر میموند دوباره انگیزه و حال خوب برگرده
الان هنوز لغزش داره اتفاقاً توی همین پیام میگه سه بار لغزش داشته
اما چه فرقی کرده؟
این بار وقتی هوس اومده، مستقیم نرفته سراغ پورن
اول Plan A و B رو امتحان کرده
بعد فهمیده هر سه لغزش تقریباً در یک بازه زمانی اتفاق افتاده: حوالی ۱۲ …
قبل از چالش، تقریباً هر ۲–۳ روز یکبار لغزش میکرد.
توی این سه هفته، رسیده به حدود هفتهای یکبار
چیزی که برای من تو این پیام مهمه فقط کمترشدن لغزش نیست ، نکته مهمتر اینه که میگه بالاخره یک مدل عملی برای مدیریت موقعیت لغزش پیدا کرده
خیلیها مشکلشون اینه که تو لحظه خطر، تو لحظه میل، تو لحظهای که دوباره همهچیز شروع میشه ، نمیدونن دقیقاً باید چه کار کنن؟!
این شرکتکننده میگه تو این سه هفته، هم آموزشها کمکش کردها…
احتمالاً تو هم این روزها زیاد دیدی که میپرسن: «با پنجاه میلیون تومن چیکار کنم؟» و بعد یه نفر میاد خیلی قاطع میگه برو طلا بخر یا دلار جمع کن.
ببین، این خطرناکترین و احمقانهترین سوالیه که میتونی بپرسی. وقتی کسی نمیدونه این پنجاه میلیون تمام دارایی توئه یا فقط یه پول اضافه برای ریسک کردن، چطور جرأت میکنه برات نسخه بپیچه؟
کسی که کل داراییش پنجاه میلیونه، نباید بره طلا بخره. اون آدم باید این پول رو روی مهارت خودش س…
لغزشهاش صفر نشده؛ ولی چیزی مهمتر عوض شده!!!
اوایل چالش هنوز لغزش داشت اما این بار چیزای مهم تری تغییر کرده بود
کمکم سؤال عوض شد:
چه چیزی منو به این نقطه رسوند؟
چه شرایطی احتمال لغزش رو بیشتر کرد؟
دفعه بعد کجای این زنجیره میتونم دخالت کنم؟
و همین تغییر ظاهراً کوچک، فقط روی رفتارش اثر نذاشته
خودش میگه خلقش بهتر شده، روی احساساتش کنترل بیشتری داره، تابآورتر شده و زندگیاش نظم بیشتری گرفته. ورزش، کتابخوندن، مدیتی…
میدونی چی برای من خیلی جالبه بعضیاتون بیرون از خونه کسب و کارتون رو اداره میکنید، پروژه جمع میکنید و گرههای کور رو باز میکنید، ولی پای جلو رفتن و یه سلام دادن ساده به یه آدمی که جذاب براتون ، دستوپاتون شل میشه و زبونتون قفل میکنه
پای رابطه که وسط میاد، دقیقاً دستت میخوره روی نقشهٔ عاطفی و کهنهزخمهایی که از خانواده و گذشتهت به ارث بردی اگه یه مشتری قرارت رو کنسل کنه ککت هم نمیگزه، اما اگه اون آدمی که ازش …
کل اینترنت رو زیر و رو میکنی دنبال کلک و ترفندهای صدمنیهغاز که چطور فلان آدمی که زمین تا آسمون باهات فرق داره رو تور کنی اما ی فرقی هست بین کشش لحظهای (Chemistry) با سازگاری واقعی (Compatibility) وقتی ارزشها، سبک زندگی و جهت حرکتت با طرف ۱۸۰ درجه فرق داره، حتی اگه شب تا صبح هم پای تلفن حرف بزنید، تهش سر از یه رابطه سمی درمیاری نمیتونی روی باتلاق تضادهای بنیادین، فقط با داغیِ هورمون و هیجان، آیندت رو بسازی. به …
تا حالا حس کردی هرچقدر روی استعدادهات کار میکنی، بازم یه جای کار میلنگه و پیش نمیری؟ طبیعیه که گیج بشی وقتی همه دارن یه نسخه واحد و تکراری رو برات میپیچن.
حتماً از این مدرسهای انگیزشی شنیدی که میگن «نقاط ضعفت رو رها کن و فقط بچسب به نقاط قوتت». راستش این یکی از سمیترین توصیههاییه که میتونی بشنوی. فرض کن اختلال نقص توجه (ADHD) داری، کارها رو نصفه ول میکنی و همیشه تمرکزت پایینه. بعد یه نفر بهت بگه اینا رو ول …
چرا هیچکی عاشقت نمیشه؟
ببین رفیق مشکل نه بخت و اقبالته و نه بدذاتی دنیا؛ مشکل دقیقاً اون گدایی تأیید و بیعزتیته که از خودت نشون میدی
گیر کار تو دو جاست و هر دوش از ترس و توهم آب میخوره:
اول اینکهتویتلهمنطقی سازی میفتی میگی قبل از اینکه بخوای قدمی برداری برای اینکه رد نشی خودت رو طرف مقابل رورد صلاحیت میکنی
یا چنان کمالگرایی سمی به جونت افتاده که سر فرم ناخن یا سلیقهٔ فیلم طرف، فاتحهٔ همهچیز رو میخون…
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @HamidRezaeiAcademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@HamidRezaeiAcademy edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر مطمئن بودی لازم نیست به کسی ثابت کنی که ارزشمندی، احتمالاً کدوم چیز بیشتر تو رفتارت عوض میشد؟
کمتر دنبال تأیید و توجه بقیه میرفتم27%
راحتتر نه میگفتم و مرز میذاشتم18%
وقتی از کسی خوشم میاومد طبیعیتر و مستقیمتر رفتار میکردم30%
از ترس قضاوت یا رد شدن خودم رو محدود نمیکردم26%
بیشتر طبق خواسته و ارزشهای خودم زندگی میکردم30%
احتمالا همه کارای بالا رو انجام میدادم26%
نمیدونم واقعا16%
The shares total 173%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
این هفته ای که گذشت کدوم یکی از این احسای زیر برات پررنگ تر از بقیه بودن؟
اضطراب38%
تنهایی38%
خستگی و بی حوصلگی51%
بی حسی29%
سگ سیاه افسردگی29%
The shares total 185%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
چند بار تا حالا تصمیم گرفتی که دیگه این بار انجامش نمیدی ولی چند ساعت یا چند روز بعد دوباره زیر تصمیمت زدی؟
اون لحظه فکر میکنی کدوم یکی از این اتفاقا افتاد؟
ته دلم واقعا نمیخواستم تغییر کنم 😏15%
واقعا میخواستم ولی اون لحظه ی چیزی درونم از تصمیم من خیلی قوی تر بود 😔91%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@HamidRezaeiAcademy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@drpsychoir named in 30 posts, 10 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
رهایی | ترک پورنوگرافی @sakoye_rahai · 72,045 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
مجله موزیک @Majaleh_Music · 31 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 August 2026
DHV | ایده رابطه @dhvmen · 26,418 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
بدنسازی اصولی @Badan_Ssazi · 59,784 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
مدرسه آنلاین آلا @alaa_sanatisharif · 46,778 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی حمید رضایی | روانشناسی کاربردی نسل امروز” (@HamidRezaeiAcademy), 77,711 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HamidRezaeiAcademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
