Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@join_warriors was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@DrPsychoIR held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +2,425. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,544–26,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 17:17
17,021
-27
6 Nov 2026, 16:39
17,048
-22
5 Nov 2026, 15:45
17,070
-66
4 Nov 2026, 16:27
17,136
-66
3 Nov 2026, 17:55
17,202
-75
2 Nov 2026, 15:37
17,277
-74
1 Nov 2026, 17:46
17,351
-93
31 Oct 2026, 21:10
17,444
-97
30 Oct 2026, 19:28
17,541
-141
29 Oct 2026, 17:46
17,682
-148
28 Oct 2026, 16:15
17,830
-173
27 Oct 2026, 12:51
18,003
-213
26 Oct 2026, 09:56
18,216
-222
25 Oct 2026, 13:18
18,438
-405
24 Oct 2026, 15:56
18,843
-16
23 Oct 2026, 19:07
18,859
-25
22 Oct 2026, 22:07
18,884
-40
21 Oct 2026, 21:46
18,924
-37
20 Oct 2026, 14:19
18,961
-29
19 Oct 2026, 16:38
18,990
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 6 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.19%
avg views ÷ 17,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
373
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.677%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
75 (6 March 2024 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
1,490
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 06m
Average length
13m 18s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,100 reactions across 58 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
267
12.7%
👀
179
8.52%
⚡
169
8.05%
👌
163
7.76%
😍
162
7.71%
🤯
150
7.14%
😱
143
6.81%
🎉
136
6.48%
🤬
132
6.29%
🤝
125
5.95%
💔
122
5.81%
🔥
119
5.67%
👏
117
5.57%
🤩
116
5.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2024 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
از کجا بفهمم واقعاً دارم از پورن فاصله میگیرم؟
فقط به تعداد روزها نگاه نکن.
گاهی استریک بالاست، ولی آدم هنوز با همون الگوهای قبلی درگیره.
برای اینکه بفهمی واقعاً داری بهتر میشی، این ۴ چیز مهمترن:
۱. کنترل بیشتر
بین هوس و عمل، فاصله بیشتری داری.
۲. Craving قابلمدیریتتر
هوس هنوز میاد، ولی کمتر تو رو با خودش میبره.
۳. پیامدهای کمتر
خواب، تمرکز، کار، رابطه یا حال روانیت کمتر آسیب میبینه.
۴. برگشت سریعتر بعد از لغ…
آیا همه در ترک پورن Withdrawal میگیرند؟
نه.
بعضی افراد بعد از کاهش یا قطع پورن علائمی شبیه Withdrawal گزارش میکنن؛ مثل:
بیقراری
تحریکپذیری
افکار جنسی مداوم
نوسان خلق
مشکل خواب
اما نکته مهم اینه که این تجربه برای همه یکسان نیست.
در پژوهشها، شدت این علائم بیشتر با شدت مصرف مشکلساز مرتبط بوده.
یعنی کسی که الگوی مصرف شدیدتر و کنترلنشدهتری داشته، ممکنه بیشتر این علائم رو تجربه کنه.
از اون طرف، یک مطالعه ۷ روزه روی…
روز ۶۰م؛ چرا هنوز هوس پورن دارم؟
یکی از اشتباههای رایج اینه که فکر کنیم هرچی روزهای ترک بیشتر میشه، هوس باید خطی کم بشه و آخرش هم کاملاً ناپدید بشه.
اما معمولاً اینطوری نیست.
Craving میتونه موجی باشه.
ممکنه چند هفته خیلی آروم باشی و بعد با یک محرک، خستگی، تنهایی، استرس یا برگشتن به یک موقعیت قدیمی دوباره شدید بشه.
این لزوماً یعنی «مغزت درست نشده» یا «ترک جواب نداده» نیست.
مهمتر از اینکه هوس هنوز وجود داره، اینه…
فرق یک لغزش با برگشت کامل به الگوی قبلی چیه؟
هر بار پورن دیدن، لزوماً به این معنی نیست که «برگشتی سر نقطه اول».
بین لغزش و برگشت کامل به الگوی قبلی فرق هست.
لغزش میتونه یک اتفاق محدود باشه:
مثلاً بعد از چند هفته، یک بار رفتار اتفاق افتاده ولی بعدش سریع برگشتی به مسیر.
اما برگشت کامل معمولاً یعنی دوباره همون الگوی قدیمی داره جا میافته:
تکرار بیشتر
کنترل کمتر
برگشتن به محرکهای قبلی
و رها کردن چیزهایی که کمکت میکردن…
🎙گاهی خود لغزش شاید ۲۰ دقیقه طول بکشه؛ اما دادگاهی که بعدش توی ذهنت راه میندازی میتونه ساعتها ادامه پیدا کنه چون به خودت میگی :
باز خراب کردم
من بیارادهام
من آدم کثیفیام
دیگه درست نمیشم 😔
اما یک سؤال مهم وجود داره:
اگه این روش واقعاً جواب میده، چرا بعد از سالها خود تنبیهی هنوز همون چرخه تکرار میشه؟ 🤔
یک تفاوت ظریف اما مهم هست بین اینکه بگی:
کاری کردم که با ارزشهام هماهنگ نبود
و اینکه نتیجه بگیری:
پس من آ…
🎙اگه پادکست بالا رو نتونستی گوش بدی یا نیاز داشتی محتوا رو مرور کنی این پی دی اف میتونه بهت کمک کنه
امیدوارم این اموزش ها بتونه بهتون کمک کنه کنترل زندگیتون رو پس بگیرید و کیفیت زندگیتون رو بالا ببرید❤️❤️
🎙اگه پادکست بالا رو نتونستی گوش بدی یا نیاز داشتی محتوا رو مرور کنی این پی دی اف میتونه بهت کمک کنه
امیدوارم این اموزش ها بتونه بهتون کمک کنه کنترل زندگیتون رو پس بگیرید و کیفیت زندگیتون رو بالا ببرید❤️❤️
💊 آموزش عمیق: @HamidRezaeiAcademy
💎 نتایج مراجعین @HamidRezaEI_Results
👤 ارتباط با ما :@warrior_admin
💀 کانال دوم: @DrPsychoIR
🎙مسیر ترک قراره حالمون رو بد کنه؟ 🤔
بذار اینجوری بهش نگاه کنیم؛ شاید بخشی از این احساسهایی که تجربه میکنی قبلاً هم وجود داشتن 🧠؛ فقط رفتاری داشتی که کمک میکرد برای ی مدت کوتاه هم که شده نبینیشون و وقتی اون راه فرار رو کنار میذاری، تازه باید با چیزی روبهرو بشی که مدتها ازش فاصله میگرفتی 🌪
و خب شاید سوال درست تر این باشه که:
آیا هدفت فقط اینه که یک رفتار رو انجام ندی 🚫، یا میخوای یاد بگیری وقتی ناراحتی، ملال…
🎙اگه پادکست بالا رو نتونستی گوش بدی یا نیاز داشتی محتوا رو مرور کنی این پی دی اف میتونه بهت کمک کنه
امیدوارم این اموزش ها بتونه بهتون کمک کنه کنترل زندگیتون رو پس بگیرید و کیفیت زندگیتون رو بالا ببرید❤️❤️
😍26👀25❤24👏20🤩19🎉18💔17😱17
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @join_warriors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه سوال جدی ازتون دارم...✅⚠️
دکتر سایکو رو برای چی دنبال میکنید؟ برای حرفهایی که شاید کمی تلخ باشن ولی تکونتون بدن؟ یا ترجیح میدید همین موضوعات رو با لحن آرومتر و ملایمتر بشنوید؟بدون تعارف بگید 👇
۱) همین لحن بیپرده و مستقیم ادامه پیدا کنه87%
۲) کمی نرمتر و متعادلتر بشه5%
۳) ترکیبی از هر دو8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2024 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@join_warriors named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@drpsychoir named in 4 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WARRIORS | اختیارتو پس بگیر ترک پورن و خودارضایی” (@join_warriors), 17,021 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/join_warriors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.