Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net -5,397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,235–78,252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:17
72,045
-180
15 Sept 2026, 11:58
72,225
-154
13 Sept 2026, 22:37
72,379
-177
12 Sept 2026, 07:39
72,556
-209
10 Sept 2026, 02:59
72,765
-287
6 Sept 2026, 18:14
73,052
-376
4 Sept 2026, 03:15
73,428
-266
2 Sept 2026, 14:55
73,694
-133
1 Sept 2026, 17:46
73,827
-139
31 Aug 2026, 21:13
73,966
-158
30 Aug 2026, 23:37
74,124
-115
30 Aug 2026, 00:53
74,239
-113
28 Aug 2026, 23:57
74,352
-122
28 Aug 2026, 03:26
74,474
-168
27 Aug 2026, 03:34
74,642
-126
26 Aug 2026, 03:14
74,768
-130
25 Aug 2026, 03:25
74,898
-131
23 Aug 2026, 23:25
75,029
-295
22 Aug 2026, 03:58
75,324
-161
20 Aug 2026, 19:05
75,485
first reading
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.56%
avg views ÷ 72,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,890
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
101 (29 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
351,390
Reactions total
12,977
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈786
Links
≈283
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 06s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,948 reactions across 101 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,736
33.7%
👍
5,018
19.3%
🕊
3,568
13.8%
💔
3,471
13.4%
👌
1,101
4.24%
❤🔥
1,020
3.93%
🤯
727
2.80%
💯
487
1.88%
👏
425
1.64%
😭
345
1.33%
😨
329
1.27%
😱
216
0.832%
😢
157
0.605%
🔥
108
0.416%
🤔
90
0.347%
🫡
70
0.27%
🤝
41
0.158%
⚡
15
0.058%
🥰
14
0.054%
🎉
9
0.035%
1 further kind
1
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,948 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 101 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sakoye_rahai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 101 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مرد بودن یعنی شرافت، یعنی بزرگی، یعنی مروت. شما فکر میکنید اگه یک زن به جای این آقا بود چنین کاری میکرد؟ نمیدونم شاید، و به خاطر همینه که واژه مردانگی در مقابل واژه نامردی قرار میگیره.
درود بر مردان نیک روزگار
@sakoye_rahai | 🕊
مدتیه درگیر یه پروژه کاری سنگین هستم و همین باعث شد حدود ۱۰ روز نتونم مثل قبل فعالیت روزانه داشته باشیم روی چنل..
ممنونم که همچنان همراهم بودید.
مخلص همه شما هستم.🙏❤️
امیدوارم از این به بعد بتونم این کم کاری رو جبران کنم و با قدرت بیشتری در مسیر پاکی قدم برداریم.
The world and God..🖤
دنیا پر از لذته..
از بدن لخت دخترا گرفته تا لذتای مختلف جسم و عشق، غذا، لمس و هزاران تجربه دیگه. اما شاید قرار نباشه هیچکدوم از این لذت ها مقصد نهایی ما باشن.
لذت جسمانی میاد و میره، اما چیزی که درون انسان میمونه، انتخاب ها و مسیریه که برای زندگیش ساخته.
خدا لذت رو از ما نخواسته که حذفش کنیم؛ خواسته یاد بگیریم اسیرش نشیم. چون فرق بزرگی هست بین اینکه از یک لذت استفاده کنی و اینکه برای به دست …
شهوترانی فقط این نیست که آدم زیاد به سکس فکر کنه یا زیاد دنبال محتوای جنسی بره.. 👁
Lust or loyalty?🤔
گاهی شهوترانی تبدیل میشه به یه سبک زندگی؛ یعنی ذهنت همیشه دنبال تحریک بعدیه، دنبال یه سوژه چشم چرونی دنبال یه تصویر، یه ویدیو، یه خیال، یه نفر، یه محرک جدید... و وقتی بهش میرسی، خیلی زود دوباره دنبال چیز بیشتری میگردی.
مشکل از جایی شروع میشه که داشتن یک زن دیگه برات کافی نیست.
اینجاست که زیاده خواهی جنسی شکل میگیره،…
ما تصور میکنیم که به سکس نیازمندیم، اما در واقع ما به صمیمت نیاز داریم ما به نوازش نیاز داریم، درک شدن، به ارتباط چشمی و پذیرفته شدن نیاز داریم، خندیدن با یک نفر، احساس امنیت در کنار او، و این احساس که کسی واقعا دوستمان دارد..
🟢در حقیقت ما به این ها نیاز داریم
✅و سکسِ امروزی یک توهم است، ساخته پورن
سلام ادمین امروز یه اتفاقی افتاد که واقعا حالم رو از خودم بهم زد...
من با یه زن متاهل وارد رابطه شدم. بعد از اون عکس های خصوصی از اندام جنسی خودش رو برام فرستاد. من هم مثل خیلی وقت های دیگه، فقط به شهوت و هیجان لحظه فکر میکردم.
تا اینکه فهمیدم شوهرش راننده اسنپه.
یه مرد معمولی...
یه مردی که احتمالا ساعت ها بیرون از خونه کار میکنه، تو گرما و سرما مسافر جا به جا میکنه، شاید با هزار تا دغدغه و فشار اقتصادی فقط برای …
گاهی فکر میکنیم فقط دنبال لذتیم، ولی اگه دقیق تر نگاه کنیم، قبلِ خیلی از لغزش ها یه حس دیگه وجود داره؛ حس تنهایی، حس استرس، بی حوصلگی، ناراحتی یا فشار ذهنی..
یعنی شاید چیزی که دنبالشیم خودِ لذت جنسی و شهوت نباشه، شاید میخوایم برای چند دقیقه از یه حس بد فرار کنیم.
پس دفعه بعد که وسوسه شدی، یه لحظه از خودت بپرس الان واقعا شهوت رو میخوام، یا فقط میخوام از حال بدم فرار کنم؟
واقعا شهوت میخوای؟ 🧐
یا داری خودتو تسکین …
خیانت همیشه سکس کردن نیست.👉👠
Cheating is not just about sex.
خیلیا فکر میکنن تا وقتی با یه نفر دیگه رابطه جنسی نداشتی، یعنی کاملا وفاداری.
اما واقعا وفاداری فقط به بدن نیست.
به نگاه و توجه آدم هم هست.
وقتی متاهلی و ساعت ها میری پیج مدل ها و دخترای مختلف رو بالا پایین میکنی، بدنشون رو نگاه میکنی، با نگاهت شهوترانی میکنی و ذهنت رو با اونا پر میکنی داری به زنت خیانت میکنی.
فلسفه وفاداری اینه که بدونی توجه تو هم ا…
بنظرم همین متن هم میتونه یه دلداری باشه برای اینکه لغزش کنی و بگی مهم نیست لغزش کردم از این به بعد دیگ نمیزنم
"کامنت اعضا"💬👥
بله دقیقا همینطوره.
این متن نباید تبدیل بشه به بهانه ایی برای مصرف پورنوگرافی و جق زدن.
❤105🕊16👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @sakoye_rahai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آکادمی حمید رضایی | روانشناسی کاربردی نسل امروز @HamidRezaeiAcademy · 77,335 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
آموزش فن بیان 🎤 @BahaminDadras · 81,243 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Vittoparsa @vittoparsayoutube · 136,124 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
روانشناسی تاریک | روان شناسی تاریک | روانشناسی سیاه | روان شناسی سیاه @ravanshenasidark · 93,466 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رهایی | ترک پورنوگرافی” (@sakoye_rahai), 72,045 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sakoye_rahai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.