ریپلایی استوری هاش بسته بود امکان اپنر نداشت ، دختر لول بالایی به نظر میرسه که خودش پیش قدم شد😂😄
🔥20❤3👍2
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓

Channel
@Maktabe_las
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,446subscribers
+99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001877366999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Maktabe_las |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Maktabe_las |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 13,446 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:24 | 13,450 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 13,446 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 13,433 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 13,435 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 13,448 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 13,473 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 13,482 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 13,484 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 13,491 | +15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 13,476 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 13,482 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 13,474 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 13,472 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 13,469 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 13,475 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 13,479 | +60 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 13,419 | +71 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 13,348 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 13,353 | first reading |
88 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 88 (24 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 131,100 |
| Reactions total | 1,591 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,248 reactions across 84 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 770 | 34.3% | |
| 🔥 | 729 | 32.4% | |
| 😁 | 464 | 20.6% | |
| 👍 | 285 | 12.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ریپلایی استوری هاش بسته بود امکان اپنر نداشت ، دختر لول بالایی به نظر میرسه که خودش پیش قدم شد😂😄
🔥20❤3👍2
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
بعدی
❤9
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
پیج شخصی من پست نداره اما استوری و هایلایت از خودم هست و صرفا تیپ و استایل و جذابیت پیج و استوری ها ۲ تاثیر روی دخترها داره ! - یا خودشون ریپلایی میزنن - یا اگر من ریپلایی بزنم گارد پایینی دارن …
❤17
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
شماره این توله هم گرفته شد
🔥23😁4
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
اومدم یک جایی ، پسرهایی که اینجا هستن ، صرفا پول دارن و چه کیس هایی باهاشون هستن که بال بال میزنن برای یک مرد جذاب و کار بلد😄 چهره و استایل شما ۱۰۰ هیچ این پسر هارو میزنه …
❤43👍1
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁18❤3
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
خب دوستان ، داستان جدید😂
😁19❤5
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
این ماژول مهمه😂 سوالاتتون رو راجع به موارد مرتبط سکس و رسیدن بهش دارید بنویسید
🔥17👍2❤1
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
ماژول هفت تا فردا تکمیله ماژول ۸ و ۹ تا پس فردا تکمیل و بعدش ضبط ویس های دوره … در مجموع ۹ ماژول پر محتوا و سنگین شد
🔥27❤7👍1
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
بعضی از کیس ها هرکاری میکنن که بری سر قرار😂 اما گاهی بهتره سرد برخورد کرد😁 ( این کیس حتی قرار اول رو هم باهاش نرفتم )
😁23❤3
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁24🔥6❤4
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
خب دوستان😂
😁23❤6🔥2
Signed 𝑨𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒛𝒂𝒓
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @Maktabe_las. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مکتب لاس زنی | روانشناسی زنان” (@Maktabe_las), 13,446 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maktabe_las.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.