Channel
@jaraghe_jazb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,990subscribers
-1,770 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001735866537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jaraghe_jazb |
| Description | توی این کانال یاد میگیری دختر مورد علاقهات رو جذب کنی و باهاش رابطه پایدار بسازی ارتباط با ما 👇👇 @alveronssadmin |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jaraghe_jazb |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 46,990 | -93 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 47,083 | -58 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 47,141 | -55 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 47,196 | -74 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 47,270 | -107 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:42 | 47,377 | -113 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 47,490 | -108 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 47,598 | -54 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 47,652 | -43 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:46 | 47,695 | -50 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 47,745 | -51 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 47,796 | -33 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 47,829 | -42 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 47,871 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 47,895 | -38 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 47,933 | -58 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 47,991 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 48,023 | -59 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 48,082 | -83 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 48,165 | first reading |
286 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 175 of 177 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 286 (3 August 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 354,207 |
| Reactions total | 3,404 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,417 reactions across 281 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,093 | 32.6% | |
| ❤ | 2,046 | 31.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,334 | 20.8% | |
| 👏 | 453 | 7.06% | |
| 👌 | 149 | 2.32% | |
| 🤬 | 66 | 1.03% | |
| 🙏 | 44 | 0.686% | |
| 🤡 | 31 | 0.483% | |
| ✍ | 26 | 0.405% | |
| 🤔 | 26 | 0.405% | |
| 🤓 | 24 | 0.374% | |
| 🍌 | 20 | 0.312% | |
| 😐 | 13 | 0.203% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.171% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 0.156% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.14% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.125% | |
| 👾 | 6 | 0.094% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.094% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.078% | |
| 16 further kinds | 37 | 0.577% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 282 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رسالت من اینه. 📌 من اینجا هستم که: - دیگه فرندزون نشی. - دیگه جواب رد نشنوی. - دیگه سرد نشی. - دیگه التماس نکنی. 📌 من اینجا هستم که: - اعتماد به نفس پیدا کنی. - انرژی مردانه پیدا کنی. - سلطه پیدا کنی. - جذابیت پیدا کنی. 📌 من اینجا هستم که: - زندگی بهتری داشته باشی. - رابطه بهتری داشته باشی. - آینده بهتری داشته باشی. و این، رسالت منه و این، دلیل بودن منه ✍️ خالد خنیفر @jaraghe_jazb
📌 من هم قبلاً: - توی فرندزون بودم. - جواب رد شنیدم. - سردی رابطه دیدم. - التماس کردم. - بلاک شدم 📌 من هم قبلاً: - فکر میکردم پول همه چیز رو حل میکنه. - فکر میکردم قیافه همه چیز رو حل میکنه. - فکر میکردم قد همه چیز رو حل میکنه. - فکر میکردم ماشین همه چیز رو حل میکنه. 📌 من هم قبلاً: - ۱۰ تا دوره دیدم. - ۱۰ تا کتاب خوندم. - ۱۰ تا مشاوره رفتم. - و هیچی عایدم نشد. 📌 تا اینکه: - فهمیدم خودم رو باید تغییر بدم. و…
❤5🔥1
«چرا من به جای آموزش، تحلیل میدم؟» 🎓 چون آموزش، دانش میده. تحلیل، بینش میده. 📌 مثال: آموزش میگه: «به دختر پیام نده.» تحلیل میگه: «چرا پیام ندیم؟ چون ابهام ایجاد میکنه. چون کشش ایجاد میکنه. چون نیاز رو کم میکنه.» آموزش، کلی است. تحلیل، جزئی است. و جزئی، قابل درکتر است. 📌 مثال: آموزش میگه: «به دختر توجه نکن.» تحلیل میگه: «چرا توجه نکنیم؟ چون تعادل رو به هم میزنه. چون ارزش تو رو پایین میاره. چون معامله ا…
🔥4
«چرا آموزشهای سطحی جواب نمیدهند؟» 🤔 چون دانش رو یاد میدن، نه مهارت رو. 📌 مثال: دانش یعنی: «میدونم چطوری رانندگی کنم.» مهارت یعنی: «میتونم رانندگی کنم.» دانش یعنی: «میدونم چطوری شنا کنم.» مهارت یعنی: «میتونم شنا کنم.» دانش یعنی: «میدونم چطوری جذب کنم.» مهارت یعنی: «میتونم جذب کنم.» 📌 مثال: پسری میگفت: «من ۱۰ تا دوره دیدم. ۱۰ تا کتاب خوندم. ولی نمیتونم جذب کنم.» پرسیدم: «چرا؟» گفت: «نمیدونم» و این دقی…
❤3👍1👏1🔥1
زنها گاهی تستت میکنن. نه به خاطر این که بدجنسن به خاطر این که میخوان ببینن تو چقدر محکمی. مثلاً: — «چند تا دوست دختر داشتی؟» — «اهل رابطه نیستم» — یا یهو سرد میشن تا ببینن واکنشت چیه اگه تو با ترس یا عصبانیت جواب بدی، باختی. اگه با خونسردی جواب بدی، بردی. من توی این چند سال، هزاران شیتتست رو تحلیل کردم. و یه الگو پیدا کردم که توی ۹۰٪ موارد جواب میده. اگه میخوای این بازی رو ببری، باید قوانینش رو بلد باشی و …
👍8🔥8👏2❤1
ظاهر، اولین چیزیه که طرف مقابلت میبینه. نه به خاطر این که سطحیه. به خاطر این که نشوندهندهی جایگاهته. من توی این چند سال، هزاران مرد رو دیدم که: — لباسشون مناسب نبود — بوی دهنشون خوب نبود — استایلشون بهروز نبود و تهش چی شد؟ طرف مقابل، حتی فرصت نداده بهشون. چون برداشت اولیه، مهمه. ظاهر ویترینه اگر ویترین خوب نباشه آیا تو وارد مغازه میشی؟ ✍️ خالد خنیفر @jaraghe_jazb
👍10❤4🔥2
یه آقا ۲۷ ساله داشتیم. هیچوقت نتونسته بود وارد رابطه بشه. هر دختری که خوشش میومد، بهش میگفت «تو مثل داداشمی». کلی خرج میکرد، کلی وقت میذاشت، ولی تهش میشنید: «نمیخوام دوستیمون خراب بشه.» اومد پیش ما. شروع کرد به یادگیری. باورهای غلطش رو کنار گذاشت. نتیجه؟ امروز همون دختری که بهش میگفت «داداشی»، براش فرستاده: «کی میخوای بیای خواستگاری؟» ما اینجا هستیم که بهت نشون بدیم میشه. نه با شانس. با یه مسیر مشخص. با ی…
🔥7❤6🍌2🤡2👏1
یادمه اولین بار که خواستم با یه دختر حرف بزنم، دستام میلرزید. قلبم مثل یه طبل توی سینهم میزد. ذهنم خالی شده بود. مثل این بود که دارم میرم جنگ. و تهش چی شد؟ هیچی. حتی جذابیت ناچیزی که اونموقع داشتم رو هم نتونستم نشون بدم. برگشتم خونه و تا صبح به خودم لعنت فرستادم. این داستان من بود. سالها. تا یه روز فهمیدم مشکل این نیست که من «بلد نیستم». مشکل اینه که هیچکس بهم یاد نداده بود جذابیت ، یه مهارته. مثل هر مهارت…
❤5👍4🔥1🤡1
اگه متاهلی و رابطهت سرد شده، این پست برای توئه. میدونم چی داری میکشی. میدونی که دیگه مثل قبل نیست. شاید حتی به طلاق فکر کردی. ولی یه چیزی رو بدون: سردی رابطه، پایان رابطه نیست. یه علامته. علامت این که یه چیزی توی رابطهت کم شده. و اون چیز، معمولاً سلطهست. من به خیلی از مردهای متاهل کمک کردم که رابطهشون رو برگردونن. از آستانه طلاق، به دوباره عاشق شدن. و توی روزهای بعد، دقیقاً میگم چطور. اگه متاهلی و میخوا…
❤10👍2🔥1🤡1
«اگه برم جلو و رد بشم، چی؟» این جمله رو چند بار توی ذهنت گفتی؟ 🤔 قانون: ترس از نه شنیدن، بیشتر از خود نه شنیدن، آدمو نابود میکنه. چون وقتی میترسی، اصلاً جلو نمیری. و وقتی جلو نری، هیچوقت نمیفهمی مشکل چیه. بعد از هزاران مشاوره، یه چیز رو مطمئن شدم: ۹۰٪ نههایی که آدمها میشنون، به خاطر این نیست که اون آدم بده. به خاطر اینه که بلد نیست چطور جلو بره. و این یه مهارته. یاد گرفتنیه. اگه تو هم از نه شنیدن میترس…
🔥9👍3👏1🤡1
میدونم چرا اینجایی. چون یه جایی ته دلت، هنوز اون حسی رو داری که چند سال پیش داشتی. همون حس که میگفت «چرا من نمیتونم؟» همون حس که وقتی میدیدی یکی راحت با دخترا حرف میزنه، توی دلت میگفتی: «چرا من نمیتونم؟» منم دقیقاً همین حس رو داشتم. سالها. تا یه روز تصمیم گرفتم. نه یه تصمیم بزرگ. فقط گفتم: «بذار یه بار هم که شده، درست یاد بگیرم.» و اون روز، همه چیز عوض شد. اگه تو هم هنوز اون حس رو داری، بدون که تنها نیس…
❤7👍2🔥1🤡1🙏1
این جمله رو از خیلی از آقایون میشنوم: «من ذاتاً اعتماد به نفس ندارم.» و من همیشه یه سوال ازشون میپرسم: «آیا تو ذاتاً رانندگی بلد بودی؟» نه. رانندگی رو یاد گرفتی. شنا کردن رو یاد گرفتی. حرف زدن رو یاد گرفتی. اعتماد به نفس هم همینه. یک مهارت است. مهارتی که با تمرین به دست میاد. 📌 چطوری؟ 1️⃣ تجربه کن. هر تجربهی جدید، اعتماد به نفست رو بیشتر میکنه. 2️⃣ اشتباه کن. هر اشتباه، یه درس بهت میده. 3️⃣ تکرار کن. هر تکرا…
👍12🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @jaraghe_jazb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@jaraghe_jazb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوره پازل کشش جنسی که دوماه پیش رایگان شده بود رو دیدی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
مبلغ دوره جدید سلطه «دست بالا» رو واسه رونمایی چقدر بذاریم؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بعد از یک رابطه ناموفق، کدام حس بیشتر به سراغت میاد؟
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
این جملات رو از هزاران مشاوره جمعآوری کردم. کدومشون رو تو هم تجربه کردی؟
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خالد خنیفر | Alveronss (جرقه جذب)” (@jaraghe_jazb), 46,990 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaraghe_jazb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.