Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rechtsanwältin Dr. Brigitte Röhrig

Channel

Rechtsanwältin Dr. Brigitte Röhrig

@RA_Roehrig

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,562subscribers

-233 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722356021
TypeChannel
Username@RA_Roehrig
Created12 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RA_Roehrig

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,56217,79517,678.56 August 2026 — 17,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,792 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,787 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,781 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,778 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,765 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,758 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,749 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,746 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,739 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,735 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,727 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,719 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,709 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,703 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,700 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,692 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,683 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,679 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,672 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,664 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,661 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,651 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,634 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,615 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,593 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,585 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,575 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,562 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,527–17,830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:0117,562-13
15 Sept 2026, 09:4017,575-10
13 Sept 2026, 21:0117,585-8
12 Sept 2026, 00:3617,593-22
9 Sept 2026, 12:2017,615-19
6 Sept 2026, 07:0017,634-17
3 Sept 2026, 23:1817,651-10
2 Sept 2026, 17:2517,661-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:1317,664-8
31 Aug 2026, 16:1317,672-7
30 Aug 2026, 19:4417,679-4
29 Aug 2026, 17:5517,683-9
28 Aug 2026, 16:4317,692-7
27 Aug 2026, 17:5717,699-1
26 Aug 2026, 20:1817,700-3
25 Aug 2026, 18:2317,703-6
24 Aug 2026, 19:5817,709-10
23 Aug 2026, 03:2417,719-8
21 Aug 2026, 15:3517,727-4
20 Aug 2026, 17:1217,731first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31m 27s
Average length
7m 52s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2026, 21:34 UTC≈16,000 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ProfHockertzVideo

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. schrieb einen Brief an die deutsche Bundesgesundheitsministerin Nina Warkin. Hier ist eine Zusammenfassung und Übersetzung der wichtigsten Punkte des Videos: Kritik an der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung in Deutschland: * Strafen für Ärzte und Patienten: Kennedy erklärt, er habe erfahren, dass über tausend deutsche Ärzte und tausende ihrer Patienten strafrechtlich verfolgt werden [00:14]. Grund d

10 Jan 2026, 21:34 UTC≈16,500 viewsread 3 September 2026

Liebe, treu gebliebene Abonnenten: Ich habe aus gesundheitlichen Gründen sehr lange nichts mehr veröffentlicht. Eine Befassung mit den vielen negativen Meldungen ist meiner Situation ebenso wenig zuträglich wie Meldungen, die auf den ersten Blick positiv erscheinen, aber die auch zweideutig sein können. Bei dieser Meldung 👇 sehe ich eine Ausnahme und bin sehr freudig bewegt: Robert F. Kennedy schreibt einen Brief

8 Jun 2025, 14:02 UTC≈28,400 viewsread 3 September 2026

👆👆Die Informationen in diesem Video lassen das Ausmaß der verheerenden Konsequenzen des Proteiengineering noch einmal in einem ganz anderen Licht erscheinen.... schlimmer Zufall oder Absicht? Auch der von Heiko Schöning prognostizierte "Angriff auf das Mikrobiom" scheint mit dem Spikeprotein bereits stattgefunden zu haben.

8 Jun 2025, 11:46 UTC≈28,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/VNDdoPhBWLA?si=QrhT7WSBAhdKVtrl

4 Jun 2025, 18:26 UTC≈22,500 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/ZFHHOBiUrkg?si=FSM7j7icvl9X3V4X

23 Apr 2025, 14:35 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

... und eine Forderung des slowakischen Premierministers Robert Fico nach einem Stopp der mRNA-Injektionen gegen COVID-19.👇

23 Apr 2025, 14:35 UTC≈22,400 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @uncut_newsVideo

🧬 Premierminister Fico: DNA-Spuren in Covid-Impfstoffen – Untersuchung eingeleitet Der slowakische Premierminister Robert Fico hat eine neue Untersuchung zur Zusammensetzung der Covid-Impfstoffe angeordnet, nachdem in verabreichten Proben nicht deklarierte DNA-Spuren entdeckt wurden. 📌 Laut einem externen Gutachten enthielten die in der Slowakei eingesetzten Impfstoffe extrem hohe Konzentrationen von DNA und Wirkst

23 Apr 2025, 13:01 UTC≈45,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔷 NIH-Direktor Prof. Jay Bhattacharya spricht Probleme der mRNA-Plattform offen an🔷 "Der nächste Schritt ist die Einstellung der mRNA-Plattform selbst..."🔷 ‼️Großer DANK an Prof. Jay Bhattacharya für die klaren Worte‼️ Es tut sich etwas in den USA in Sachen mRNA-Plattform: Prof. Jay Bhattacharya, der neue Direktor des National Institute of Health, NIH, spricht die Probleme der mRNA-Plattform offen an und spricht v

22 Apr 2025, 12:41 UTC≈12,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/open-source/chemiker-fragen-zu-corona-impfstoffen-was-zum-teufel-soll-da-vertuscht-werden-li.2318308

22 Apr 2025, 12:40 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Die Chemie-Professoren bleiben weiter "am Ball". Das PEI hatte die Professoren im Rahmen ihrer IFG-Anfragen zum Teil an die EMA verwiesen. Die EMA antwortet - unter Missachtung sämtlicher Fristen - mit im Wesentlichen geschwärzten Dokumenten. Insbesondere die Spezifikationen sind geschwärzt. 👇👇👇

21 Apr 2025, 12:40 UTC≈8,950 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschVideo

Noch ein bisher eher unbekannter Beleg dafür, dass der ÖRR auch mal anders konnte: ZDF-Frontal am 19.01.2010 über die damaligen Pandemie-Machenschaften der und den Einfluss der Pharmaindustrie auf die WHO. t.me/Rosenbusch

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RA_Roehrig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 48,456
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner
@rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 82,818
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rechtsanwältin Dr. Brigitte Röhrig” (@RA_Roehrig), 17,562 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RA_Roehrig.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.