Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,779–27,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 04:20
26,997
+8
17 Oct 2026, 02:47
26,989
-1
15 Oct 2026, 23:46
26,990
-14
15 Oct 2026, 00:58
27,004
+2
13 Oct 2026, 21:19
27,002
+25
6 Oct 2026, 11:18
26,977
+36
1 Oct 2026, 10:59
26,941
+91
18 Sept 2026, 12:58
26,850
+12
16 Sept 2026, 08:21
26,838
-21
14 Sept 2026, 16:21
26,859
+29
13 Sept 2026, 05:01
26,830
-21
11 Sept 2026, 04:16
26,851
-32
8 Sept 2026, 05:59
26,883
-22
4 Sept 2026, 23:19
26,905
-15
3 Sept 2026, 06:47
26,920
-27
1 Sept 2026, 22:15
26,947
-15
1 Sept 2026, 01:05
26,962
-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:32
26,970
-14
29 Aug 2026, 22:55
26,984
-17
28 Aug 2026, 20:07
27,001
first reading
Engagement
184 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 26,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,360
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
103
of 184 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
184 (28 July 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
750,700
Reactions total
19,334
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,700
Videos
≈2,250
Links
≈1,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 58s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32,801 reactions across 180 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,805
36.0%
😁
5,043
15.4%
🔥
3,155
9.62%
👍
2,528
7.71%
🤡
2,202
6.71%
😭
1,822
5.55%
🤣
973
2.97%
❤🔥
669
2.04%
😢
479
1.46%
💔
399
1.22%
👏
322
0.982%
👀
312
0.951%
😱
261
0.796%
💯
236
0.719%
💘
204
0.622%
🤬
203
0.619%
🤔
197
0.601%
😐
189
0.576%
💩
163
0.497%
🤮
144
0.439%
42 further kinds
1,495
4.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 183 of the 184 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,663 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 183 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RacingWeekend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 184 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 17 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.09%
2 of 184 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,050
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,340
over 181 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqv4HErg
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
2Vtzqwi7bXJ
1
30 September 2026
30 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Хельмут Марко решил козырями ответить на обвинения от Хорнера:
Это я привёл Макса Ферстаппена в Формулу-1. И мне пришлось дать отпор Хорнеру в Барселоне 2016 года. Он считал, что Макс слишком молод и слишком неопытен для старшей команды.
Мотоспорт Италия сообщает, что Ф1 хочет сохранить Гран-при Катара и Абу-Даби до последнего момента.
Сейчас проведение обоих Гран-при остается в силе, но в Имоле уже устанавливают трибуны, так как руководство Формулы-1 предупредило их быть готовыми к проведению гонки 6 декабря, если этап в Абу-Даби в конечном итоге сорвется.
Ф1 покроет расходы на организацию, даже если этот итальянский Гран-при в итоге не понадобит…
Про гоночную Lada Iskra TMS — что это такое и зачем?
Внутри паддока прошла презентация нового гоночного снаряда от тольяттинского бюро «ТМС Моторспорт» — Lada Iskra TMS, вокруг которого в 2027 году запускают полноценный монокубок Lada Iskra Cup.
Если вы видели, как устроены любительские гонки за рубежом, или гоняли в симуляторах, то наверняка знаете про чемпионаты и отдельные соревнования, где все пилоты едут на не…
Рафаэль Камара станет новым пилотом команды Хаас с 2027 года
Окона заменит бразильский юниор Феррари, на данный момент лидирующий в чемпионате Формулы 2. В прошлом году Рафа с первой попытки выиграл сезон Формулы 3.
Ferrari представит последнее крупное обновление для SF-26 в Остине:
Новое днище для увеличения прижимной силы и стабильности
Более узкие воздухозаборники боковых понтонов
Изменения в геометрии кожуха двигателя и системе охлаждения
После этого аэродинамическая доработка SF-26 будет практически завершена, и Ferrari переключит свои ресурсы на болид 2027 года. Ну что, в этот раз точно победа? Мерседесы вероятно будут со…
Пока проходил Гран-при Сингапура, я решил посетить значительно более событийное мероприятие, а именно — финальный этап СМП РСКГ. И должен сказать, что Moscow Raceway — идеальное место для закрытия сезона. Ощущение решающей битвы витало буквально во всех классах: в кузовных зачетах претендентов разделяли считанные очки, поэтому борьба шла до самых последних метров.
Что касается экшена, то весь день был наполнен гонка…
Фернандо Алонсо и Шарль Леклер могли оказаться в Red Bull, если бы не Хельмут Марко
Кристиан Хорнер рассказал, что хотел пригласить Алонсо в 2025 году, и сам Фернандо тоже был готов к переходу:
В Японии Фернандо сказал мне, что очень горит желанием выступать вместе с Максом в следующем сезоне.
Однако кто-то из лагеря Макса — не сам Макс — решил, что для Red Bull это будет неправильным шагом: Меня это разочаровало.
…
Спасибо дотошным иностранным коллегам, появились новые подробности о будущем автодроме в Руанде, который в начале 2030-х годов вновь примет Гран-при Африки Формулы 1.
🔸 Рабочее название будущей трассы: RISE
🔸 Протяженность: чуть более 6 км
🔸Количество поворотов: 17
🔸Перепады высот на круге: 197 метров (сравните: в Спа – 102 метра). При проектировании будут использованы преимущества естественного рельефа, в частности…
Результаты Гран-при Сингапура
Поздравляем Макса со второй победой подряд и первой в карьере на данной трассе. Доминировал весь уикенд и находил десятые там, где, казалось, их не было. Самое впечатляющее, что Максу осталось 17 очков до 2 строчки в чемпионате и 7 очков в Кубке конструкторов до Макларена. Сегодняшняя гонка усложнилась и тем, что со стороны Макса не работало радио. Команде пришлось общаться с нидерландц…
❤154🔥30👍17😭7❤🔥2⚡1🏆1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @RacingWeekend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@RacingWeekend edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 October 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Сафронов из паддока @safronovf1 · 22,994 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
F1 KEKW @f1kekw · 26,607 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
Вестникъ Формул @vestnikformul · 28,130 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
Формула-1 | Мемы, новости @formuladank · 34,464 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
Башмаков о гонках @bashmakov_v_racing · 34,942 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
STANIZLAVSKY - ФОРМУЛА 1 @stanizlavsky · 229,619 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Формула-1 | Прямые трансляции @f1_sports · 74,860 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Simply Formula | Формула-1 | Автоспорт @simply_formula · 236,281 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Гаснут Огни @f1alexeypopov · 109,366 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
🥇First Place @first_places · 20,385 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
RACE JOURNAL @racejournal · 24,078 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Психологическая поддержка фанатов Ferrari | Формула-1 @hotlineferrari · 26,025 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
BOX BOX | ФОРМУЛА-1 @box_box_formula1 · 20,246 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
evgenymoto - трансляции МотоГП и ВСБК на русском! @rumotosport · 25,786 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
F1UA @f1ua_f1 · 23,339 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
Formula1 @formula1 · 47,991 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гоночный Уикенд” (@RacingWeekend), 26,997 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RacingWeekend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.