Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Formula1

Channel

Formula1

@formula1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46,315subscribers

+442 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299044567
TypeChannel
Username@formula1
DescriptionFormula 1 Live Feedback: @F1fb_bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/formula1

Growth

45,79446,36246,0786 August 2026 — 45,873 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,873 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,869 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,867 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,857 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45,845 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,824 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,801 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,815 subscribers15 August 2026 — 45,820 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,794 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,795 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,794 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,815 subscribers21 August 2026 — 45,823 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,075 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,357 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,362 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,358 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,359 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,356 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,354 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,343 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,344 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,318 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,315 subscribers46,3156 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 26 days, net +442. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,709–46,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 00:1446,315-3
1 Sept 2026, 00:5946,318-26
31 Aug 2026, 00:3746,344+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:0546,343-11
29 Aug 2026, 00:4346,354-2
28 Aug 2026, 01:3446,356-3
27 Aug 2026, 03:0446,359+1
26 Aug 2026, 04:5246,358-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:5246,362+5
24 Aug 2026, 07:4946,357+282
22 Aug 2026, 16:1346,075+252
21 Aug 2026, 09:4945,823+8
20 Aug 2026, 12:1345,815+21
19 Aug 2026, 09:3445,794-1
18 Aug 2026, 13:0445,795+1
17 Aug 2026, 10:0445,794-26
15 Aug 2026, 19:5845,820+5
14 Aug 2026, 09:5845,815+14
12 Aug 2026, 23:5645,801-23
11 Aug 2026, 21:5245,824first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 46,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,620
116 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held132 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total651,350
Reactions total14,699
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,800
Videos
2,100
Links
2,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 30s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,814 reactions across 132 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8,03345.1%
😭2,36313.3%
❤‍🔥2,17912.2%
🤣7384.14%
😱6583.69%
🤡6173.46%
🎉4292.41%
👏4022.26%
👍3962.22%
👎3481.95%
💔3051.71%
🤩2451.38%
🤔1410.792%
😴1380.775%
🍾990.556%
🏆950.533%
👀880.494%
🥴800.449%
💯750.421%
🫡740.415%
9 further kinds3111.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,814 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
127
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 132 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
91
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @formula1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC≈2,350 views180 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨 BREAKING: Isack Hadjar to miss Italian Grand Prix following the injury which ruled him out of the Dutch Grand Prix.

😭129💔38❤‍🔥8👍5

2 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,650 views102 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

September update Clearer photos of the blade and Qiddiya Motorsport village

❤‍🔥67🔥13👍10😱8🥴4

1 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈5,340 views305 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Sebastian Vettel will do an honorary lap in Michael Schumacher’s F2002 before Sunday’s race in Monza ❤️ What a moment that will be 🙌

❤‍🔥242🔥34🎉19👍8👎1🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC≈4,920 views152 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

A livery fit for home 🏡 Our Monza livery is here, inspired by the lasting impact of Michael Schumacher on our team ❤️ - Scuderia Ferrari

🔥108❤‍🔥30👏6🤨3🍾2🤩2💯1

31 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈5,360 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Flying in formation! ✈️ Celebrating a 1-2 in style at Monza 🤩 #F1 #ItalianGP

🔥83🍓9🥴1😱1

31 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈6,090 views315 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

IT'S RACE WEEK IN ITALY! 🥰🇮🇹 We're back for Round 13 at Monza 💪 #F1 #ItalianGP

🔥236❤‍🔥47🆒11🎉9👍5🤩3🍾2👎1

30 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈6,330 views327 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Kimi's stats as a teenager are phenomenal 🤯

❤‍🔥222🔥41🏆3511🤡9👍5🤩2😱2

29 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈6,790 views149 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

'Nowhere else I'd rather be' 🧡 Lando Norris is staying at McLaren until at least 2030 after signing a new contract.

🔥100❤‍🔥24🤡17👎4🍓1👀1💯1🤩1

29 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈7,250 views330 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Lando Norris will continue to race for McLaren through 2030 #F1

🔥227💯30🎉15🤣13👎12🌭7🏆7🤨6

28 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈7,450 views121 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

There were 19 red flags over two days of testing at the new Madring circuit for the F3 grid. With 10 different drivers getting a bit too close to the barriers 👀🇪🇸

🔥72😱24🤡13🤨6🤣5😭1

28 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈6,750 views124 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Still wondering how Nico Hulkenberg avoided the spinning Gabriel Bortoleto on the first lap at Zandvoort? 🙋‍♂️ Here's how... 👀 #F1 #DutchGP

🔥95👏14😱11🫡3🤩1

27 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈6,940 views112 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

The 2027 driver line-up is taking shape 👀 Alpine confirms that Franco Colapinto will partner Pierre Gasly next season 😮‍💨 #F1

🔥83❤‍🔥13👍8🤡5🍓1🍾1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @formula1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 963,338 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Formula1” (@formula1), 46,315 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/formula1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.