Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oʻzbek mafkurasi: nihoyasiz dekonstruksiya

Channel

Oʻzbek mafkurasi: nihoyasiz dekonstruksiya

@Radikal_Demokrat

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

13,197subscribers

+1,242 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002984049271
TypeChannel
Username@Radikal_Demokrat
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Radikal_Demokrat

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,300 average views per post against 13,197 subscribers — an engagement rate of 62.9%. Across the 794 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,010–31,427 subscribers, posting mainly in Turkish — the middle half sit between 3.57% and 16.0%, with a median of 8.96%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 August 2026 20 September 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled91,300
Mature posts only62.9% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,197 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:tur · 794 channels · p10 1.58% · p25 3.57% · p50 8.96% · p75 16.0% · p90 26.2%
Position in cohort99.369th percentile · 7.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.221% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageTurkish · 75.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,09414,03612,5657 August 2026 — 11,955 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,955 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,944 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,862 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,782 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,721 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,596 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,505 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,399 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,818 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,669 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,588 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,511 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,470 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,355 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,258 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,199 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,147 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,094 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,635 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,036 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,884 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,768 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,715 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,643 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,538 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,260 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,776 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,612 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,479 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,322 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,197 subscribers13,1977 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1,242. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,653–14,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:5713,197-125
15 Sept 2026, 19:4013,322+843
14 Sept 2026, 01:1912,479-133
12 Sept 2026, 06:1612,612-164
10 Sept 2026, 03:2012,776-484
6 Sept 2026, 17:2013,260-278
4 Sept 2026, 08:1813,538-105
2 Sept 2026, 21:3713,643-72
1 Sept 2026, 20:2513,715-53
31 Aug 2026, 23:1513,768-116
30 Aug 2026, 23:4513,884-152
29 Aug 2026, 20:2814,036+401
28 Aug 2026, 17:0713,635+2,541
27 Aug 2026, 19:3411,094-53
26 Aug 2026, 21:1411,147-52
25 Aug 2026, 18:5511,199-59
24 Aug 2026, 21:1411,258-97
23 Aug 2026, 05:3711,355-115
21 Aug 2026, 17:1911,470-41
20 Aug 2026, 16:4311,511first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.9%
avg views ÷ 13,197 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,300
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held43 (24 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total91,300
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
2m 53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7085.4%
🕊1214.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 43 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
29
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Radikal_Demokrat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 09:39 UTC≈7,590 viewsread 2 September 2026

KECHINMALAR Sukunat begona — ko‘ksimda bo‘ron, Sokinlik ichida bo‘g‘ilar yurak. Menga torlik qilar “musaffo osmon”, Qalbim sigʻdirolmas bir dunyo kerak. Oʻzgalar izlagan osoyishta kun, Ravon yo‘l ularga yetarli go‘yo. Men esa kunlarni yoraman har tun, Ko‘ksimda uyg‘oqdir cheksizlik mangu. Meni chorlar uzoq, noma’lum ufqlar, Har bir sir ortida ming sir uyg‘onar. Bir savol tug‘ilsa, ming javob so‘rar, Bir javob topi

31 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈7,700 viewsread 2 September 2026

Ёки мустақилликка эришган кўплаб Африка мамлакатлари мисоли кўрсатганидек, деколонизация ҳокимиятнинг шахсий таркибини алмаштирган (бизнинг ҳолатда унчалик ҳам эмас), лекин унинг шаклига тегмаган бўлиши мумкин: фуқаролик ўрнига аҳолини маъмурий бошқариш. 31 август — жамиятнинг озод бўлган куни эмас, суверенитетнинг иттифоқ даражасидан республика даражасига қайта рўйхатдан ўтказилган куни; айни ўша аппарат ва аҳоли б

31 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈7,590 viewsread 2 September 2026

Суверенитет Аслида Ўзбекистон мустақиллиги ҳақида ҳеч нарса ёзмоқчи эмасдим. Очиғини айтаман: у мен учун ўз-ўзидан қадрият эмас. Миллий давлат ва унинг суверенитети биз курашишимиз керак бўлган, пайдо бўлганидан хурсанд бўлиб байрам қилишимиз лозим бўлган институтлар деб ҳисобламайман. Ўзбек ўқувчиси учун бу жуда радикал туюлиши мумкин. Майли, байрам қилаверишсин. Байрамни бузишнинг нима кераги бор, шундай эмасми?

30 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈7,850 viewsread 2 September 2026

Bu holatda tarixiy xotira bilan subyekt o‘rtasiga vositachi institut kiradi. Bu yerda epistemik hokimiyatning nozik shakli yuzaga keladi: kim matnni o‘qiy olsa, kim uni tarjima qilsa, kim qaysi manbani darslikka kiritishni tanlasa, o‘tmishning qaysi shaklda mavjud bo‘lishini ham belgilaydi. Sovet milliy siyosatini faqat “millatlar tugatilishi” sifatida tasvirlash tarixiy jarayonning bir qismini ko‘rish bilan cheklan

30 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈7,860 viewsread 2 September 2026

Demak, “o‘zbeklik” faqat kolonial hokimiyat tomonidan yaratilgan passiv kategoriya sifatida tushuntirilishi ham biryoqlama bo‘ladi. Mahalliy ziyolilar va siyosiy kuchlar bu kategoriyani o‘z maqsadlari uchun qayta ishladilar, unga yangi mazmun berdilar va uni siyosiy safarbarlik vositasiga aylantirdilar. Bu jarayonni Fuko tili bilan tushunadigan boʻlsak, hokimiyatga qarshi turish hokimiyat ishlab chiqargan diskurs may

30 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈7,720 viewsread 2 September 2026

1. Hokimiyatning moddiy reallikni o‘zgartirish imkoniyati cheklangach, u nomlash, takrorlash va marosimlashtirish orqali ramziy reallikni ishlab chiqarish hamda uni insonlar tasavvurida legitimlashtirishga urinadi. 2. Muayyan da’voni takror va takror ilgari surish orqali hokimiyat uni ijtimoiy jihatdan tan olingan haqiqatga aylantiradi va shu tariqa haqiqatning institutsional-diskursiv konstruksiyasini barpo etadi.

28 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈10,100 views0 reactions15 Starsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @altruistning_qizi

Bu yerda devor bor Bu shahar dunyodagi eng yaxshi shahar; aholisi dunyodagi eng yaxshi odamlar. Ular ideal davlat, ideal inson, ideal oila va ideal munosabatlar qanday bo‘lishini bilishadi — lekin amalda unga yetishga harakat qilishmaydi. Bu yerda ikkita odam bir uyda yashasa, bu ideal oila hisoblanadi. Ko‘cha qop-qorong‘i bo‘lsa-da, tunning qorong‘iligini yaqqol ko‘rsatib turgan yagona chiroqli ko‘cha bor bòlsa, un

26 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈8,900 views0 reactions29 Starsread 2 September 2026

Milliy-populizm va konformizmning iqtisodiy negizi bir xil fundamental asosga ega: biri jamiyatdagi mavjud boʻlinishlar va ziddiyatlarni “umummilliy manfaat”, “milliy birdamlik” va “vatanparvarlik” tushunchalari bilan xiralashtirish orqali oʻz hukmronligi yaratgan mavjud tartibni tanqiddan holi qilishga urinsa, ikkinchisi tizim muammolarini individual axloqiy sifatlar (masalan, poraxoʻrlik, yovuzlik yoki dangasalik)

24 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈8,910 viewsread 2 September 2026

Millat shaxslar bir-birini shaxsan taniganidan kelib chiqadigan tabiiy birlik emas; u millionlab insonlarni o‘zlarini bir xil siyosiy jamoaga mansub deb tasavvur qilishga imkon beradigan kommunikativ va institutsional tizimlar orqali barpo qilinadi. Bu jarayonda maktab darsligi, gazeta, xarita, aholini ro‘yxatga olish, muzey, bayram, davlat ramzlari va tarixiy yodgorliklar bir-biridan alohida ko‘rinadigan, aslida esa

24 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈8,070 viewsread 2 September 2026

d) O‘zbeklik diskursining shakllanishi: millat, tarix va madaniyatning siyosiy konstruksiyasi “O‘zbeklik” tushunchasi kundalik hayotda ko‘pincha qadimdan mavjud bo‘lgan, o‘z-o‘zidan ravshan, tarix davomida o‘zgarmagan va muayyan hududda yashovchi odamlarning tabiiy xususiyati sifatida tasavvur qilinadi. Go‘yoki “o‘zbek” degan nom tarixning eng qadimgi qatlamlaridan bugungi kungacha o‘zgarmas holda yetib kelgan, shu

21 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈7,240 viewsread 2 September 2026

Aslida bu intizomni zoʻravonlik yoʻli bilan singdirish amaliyoti xolos, yaʼni bolalarni itoatkor qul sifatida tarbiyalashning rejali bozor ostidagi mexanizmi. Xitoy davlat mafkurasi esa buni shunchaki “bolalarda qiyinchiliklarga chidamlilikni shakllantirish” deb romantizatsiya qilish orqali legitimlashtirib beryapti, oʻrta sinf esa “meni bolam shaharda noziktabiat boʻlib ketdi, ularga hayot qiyinchiligini koʻrsatishi

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Radikal_Demokrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Radikal_Demokrat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oʻzbek mafkurasi: nihoyasiz dekonstruksiya” (@Radikal_Demokrat), 13,197 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Radikal_Demokrat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.