به مناسبت فرا رسیدن سالروز شهادت پیامبر گرامی اسلام ، کانال پرسمان اعتقادی ( شیعه پاسخ ) تقدیم می کند ؛ ✔️پرسش و پاسخ های برگزیده پیرامون شهادت پیامبر گرامی اسلام ؛ ١_ آیا پیامبر گرامی اسلام شهید شدند یا به مرگ طبیعی از دنیا رفتند ❕ ⚫️ https://t.me/Rahnamye_Behesht/5156 ٢ _ آیا پیامبر گرامی در حالی جان دادند و از دنیا رفتند که سرشان بر بالین عایشه بود ❕ ⚫️ https://t.me/Rahnamye_Behesht/5158 ٣_ آیا این داستان…

Channel
شیعه پاسخ
@Rahnamye_Behesht
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,072subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008677912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rahnamye_Behesht |
| Created | 24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rahnamye_Behesht |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “کانال پرسمان اعتقادی” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 5,072 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 5,074 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 5,076 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 5,073 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 5,070 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 5,066 | +16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 5,050 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 5,047 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 5,046 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 5,043 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:10 | 5,034 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5,035 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 5,035 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16m 34s
- Average length
- 2m 22s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 38 | 42.7% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 40.4% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📺فلسفه ازدواجهای متعدد پیامبر اسلام !!! ▫️دشمنان اسلام در مورد ازدواجهای پیامبر گرامی افسانه گرایی کرده و این ازدواجهای را با مسائل جنسی و شهوانی مرتبط می سازند , ما در کلیپ فوق در این رابطه روشنگری کرده و توضیحات کافی را ارائه داده ایم . @Rahnamye_Behesht
🎬 موشن گرافیک| آیا امام حسن علیه السلام مِطْلاق بوده است ? جریانهای معاند همواره شبهه می کنند که مطابق روایات شیعه , امام حسن علیه السلام همسران زیادی می گرفت و آنان را طلاق می داد تا جایی که امیر مومنان بر منبر رفتند و از مردم خواستند که دخترانشان را به همسری امام حسن در نیاورند , زیرا امام حسن فردی پر طلاق و مِطلاق است !!!! 👌پاسخ را در کلیپ فوق ببینید . @Rahnamye_Behesht
📖کتاب الکترونیک : " پاسخ به شبهات فضای مجازی پیرامون پیامبر گرامی اسلام " ( جلد اول ) ✍احمد پودینهئی ❕کتاب فوق حاوی بروزترین و تازه ترین شبهات مطرح شده توسط جریانهای معاند پیرامون پیامبر گرامی اسلام است که نویسنده با شبهه یابی میدانی و دقیق , آنها را گرد آوری کرده و مورد پاسخگویی قرار داده است . برخی از شبهات پاسخ داده شده در کتاب فوق عبارتند از : ازدواج پیامبر اسلام با زنان با انگیزه مالی و زیبایی آنان _ بی ایما…
👍1
به مناسبت فرا رسیدن سالروز شهادت امام حسن مجتبی علیه السلام کانال پرسمان اعتقادی ( شیعه پاسخ ) تقدیم می کند ؛ ⚫️برخی از پرسش و پاسخ های برگزیده پیرامون امام حسن علیه السلام ؛ ١_ فلسفه صلح امام حسن علیه السلام با معاویه چه بوده است ❕ ⚫️ https://t.me/Rahnamye_Behesht/4353 ٢ _ آیا دریافت خراج و پول توسط امام حسن علیه السلام از معاویه در جریان صلحشان واقعیت دارد❕ ⚫️https://t.me/Rahnamye_Behesht/6635 ٣_ آیا صحی…
آیا حضرت سلیمان علیه السلام با ملکه سبا ازدواج کرد؟ 🤔 #پرسش: ❓آخر عاقبت ملکه سبا به کجا انجامید؟ آیا واقعیت دارد که حضرت سلیمان علیه السلام با او ازدواج کرد؟ 💠#پاسخ:💠 ❕در این رابطه، در تفسیر نمونه میخوانیم: " آنچه در قرآن مجيد پيرامون ملكه سبأ آمده همان مقدار است كه در بالا خوانديم، سرانجام ايمان آورد و به خيل صالحان پيوست، اما اينكه بعد از ايمان به كشور خود بازگشت و به حكومت خود از طرف سليمان ادامه داد؟ يا نز…
❤3👎1
شیعه پاسخ pinned a file
📘 کتاب الکترونیک رایگان: پاسخ به شبهات اعتقادی و تاریخی فضای مجازی – جلد پنجم ✍️ تألیف: احمد پودینهئی ❕در این جلد از مجموعهی «پاسخ به شبهات اعتقادی و تاریخی فضای مجازی»، تازهترین شبهات مطرحشده در فضای رسانهای پیرامون عقاید اسلامی، تاریخ صدر اسلام، و جایگاه امامان معصوم علیهمالسلام مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. 📖 این کتاب منبعی مفید برای پژوهشگران، طلاب، مبلغین، و عموم علاقهمندان به مباحث اعتقادی و تاریخ اسلام…
👍1
شیعه پاسخ pinned a file
شیعه پاسخ pinned a video
🎥موشنگرافیک| همکاری با متجاوز؛ پاسخ متقابل! ❓برخی میپرسند: جنگ اصلی ایران با آمریکا و اسرائیل است؛ آیا حمله متقابل ایران به کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس، با انصاف و جوانمردی سازگار است؟ 🎬در این کلیپ، با استناد به آیات قرآن، روایات و تحلیلهای عقلی و عرفی، به این پرسش مهم پاسخ داده شده و جایگاه کشورهایی که امکانات، پایگاه یا حریم هوایی خود را در اختیار متجاوز قرار میدهند، بررسی شده است. 📺 مشاهده و انتشار این کلیپ را …
👍2👎2
#پاسخ_به_شبهات_دینی - بروز رسانی جدید سایت #شیعه_پاسخ ▪️آیا شیعه معتقد است خدا میخندد؟ بررسی روایات و معنای صحیح آن! 📎 https://shiapasokh.com/?p=4589 ▫️آیا پیادهروی برای زیارت اربعین و حرم اهلبیت علیهم السلام اتلاف وقت و عمر است؟ 📎 https://shiapasokh.com/?p=4591 ▪️آیا شیعه کربلا را از کعبه برتر میداند؟ پاسخ به شبهه وهابیت درباره زیارت اربعین! 📎 https://shiapasokh.com/?p=4593 ▫️زیارت اربعین یا کمک به فقرا؟ کدا…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Rahnamye_Behesht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@naghde_eslamm · 37,159
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شیعه پاسخ” (@Rahnamye_Behesht), 5,072 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rahnamye_Behesht.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.