Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -597. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,718–37,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 19:52
36,809
+1
4 Nov 2026, 22:28
36,808
-18
3 Nov 2026, 20:08
36,826
-3
2 Nov 2026, 22:51
36,829
-14
1 Nov 2026, 21:30
36,843
-14
31 Oct 2026, 18:39
36,857
-11
30 Oct 2026, 20:40
36,868
-12
29 Oct 2026, 18:41
36,880
-3
28 Oct 2026, 18:19
36,883
-11
27 Oct 2026, 17:59
36,894
-8
26 Oct 2026, 14:56
36,902
-4
25 Oct 2026, 13:06
36,906
-10
24 Oct 2026, 11:10
36,916
-2
23 Oct 2026, 08:35
36,918
-4
22 Oct 2026, 11:40
36,922
-8
21 Oct 2026, 05:07
36,930
-19
20 Oct 2026, 05:21
36,949
-11
19 Oct 2026, 02:27
36,960
-5
18 Oct 2026, 03:06
36,965
-1
17 Oct 2026, 00:09
36,966
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 36,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
61 (18 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
117,620
Reactions total
1,574
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,630
Videos
≈4,140
Links
≈6,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,539 reactions across 58 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,363
69.2%
👎
2,223
16.4%
😁
505
3.73%
👏
432
3.19%
👌
376
2.78%
🤪
272
2.01%
🤬
188
1.39%
🤮
109
0.805%
❤🔥
50
0.369%
😱
21
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (45.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
چگونه پيامبر اسلام، ٤ سال پس از مرگ پدرش بدنيا آمد؟
چه كسى پدر واقعى اوست؟
چرا مادرش ميگفت، تاكنون چندين بار حامله شده است؟
چه كسى او را حامله ميكرد وقتى كه همسر نداشت؟
آيا آمنه جزو زنانى بود كه پرچم سرخ بالاى خانه اش برافراشته بود؟
پاسخ به تمامى اين سئوالات را در قالب يك ويديو برايتان آماده كرده ام.
براى ديدن نسخه كامل اين ويديو بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
دوستان عزيز در يوتيوب لطفا روى HYPE كليك كنيد.
در زير ويديو …
چرا دانشمندان معتقدند كه قرآن را انسان نوشته است؟
طرفداران این دیدگاه معتقدند قرآن در اصل یک کتاب واحد نبوده که در یک یا دو دهه از زندگی یک نسل نوشته شده باشد. بلکه مجموعهای از متون است که از منابع مختلف گردآوری و طی مراحل طولانی ویرایش شده تا سرانجام به شکل قرآنی که امروز میشناسیم درآید. از این رو، قرآنی که در دست ماست، در واقع ویرایشی از یک متن اصلی قدیمیتر است که محمد بر پایهٔ آن قرآن خود را ساخت و تحولش پس از…
آياتى كه ثابت ميكنند قرآن را انسانها نوشته اند.
در اين ويديو با پرداختن به مثالهاى متعدد به ايرادات كلامى و نقض بلاغت در نوشتار سوره هاى قرآن پرداخته و به زبان ساده و مثالهاى ملموس، اثبات كرده ام كه نه تنها قرآن، كامل بى نقص و ايرادى نيست، بلكه داراى صدها ايراد كلامى و ادبى است كه خود به خود ادعاى الهى بودن آنرا بى اثر ميكند.
براى ديدن نسخه كامل اين ويديو، بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
لطفا ويديو را براى ديده شدن بيشتر،…
مسلمانها يك مشت وحشى بودند كه محمد آنها را به جان دنيا انداخت
در اين ويديو، آيت الله مرتضى جزايرى با اشاره به جعلى بودن كل تاريخ اسلام، مسلمانان را يك عده جانور وحشى خطاب ميكند كه در يك جامعه بدون فرهنگ و بدون تمدن زندگى ميكردند و محمد با متحد كردن آنها، به كشورهاى همسايه تجاوز كردند و تنها ثمره آن قتل و غارتى بود كه حتى مغولها هم دست به آن نزدند.
براى ديدن نشخه كامل اين ويديو، بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
چه کسانی و چرا قرآن را نوشته اند؟
در اين ويديو: برخی پژوهشگران معتقدند نشانههای متعددی وجود دارد که محمد برای تألیف قرآن از افراد زیادی کمک گرفته است. بسیاری از آیات قرآن به این موضوع اشاره کردهاند، هرچند کسی را به نام ذکر نکردهاند. اما روایات اسلامی نام کسانی را ذکر کردهاند که محمد متهم به گرفتن از آنها شده؛ مانند ورقه بن نوفل نصرانی ابیونی که مورخان گفتهاند انجیل را به عربی مینوشته و انجیلی که نزد ورقه بوده،…
اين قرآنى كه دست ماست، ربطى به محمد ندارد.
درباره قرائت های مختلف قرآن، ویدیوهای زیادی را، در کانال نقد و همچنين كانال يوتيوب فکت استودیو بارگذارى کرده ام. این ویدیوها، شامل یافته های پژوهشگرانی، مانند دکتر جی اسمیت، دکتر دانیل بروبیکر و همچنین علمای مسلمانی مانند علامه سید کمال حیدری میباشند.
اما هموطنان مسلمان همیشه با بهانه های کودکانه سعی میکنند که بگویند که این قرائت ها هیچ ایرادی در متن آیه های قرآن وارد نمیکند…
آيا الله يكى بتهاى اعراب قبل از اسلام بود؟
در اين ويديو به شواهد جديدى كه دانشمندان در سال ٢٠٢٤ به ان دست يافته اند ميپردازم كه به ما اطلاعات فراوانى از الله پيش از اسلام ميدهد.
بخش عمدهٔ شواهد ما، از کتیبههای صفایی میآید. صفایی، خطی است که بادیهنشینان عرب، با آن هزاران متن کوتاه روی سنگهای بیابان سیاه اردن، سوریه و شمال عربستان، هک کردهاند. دکتر احمد الجلاد، و تیمش دریافتهاند که الله، کمتر از ۵۰ بار، در حدود ۵…
💥چرا به پيامبر اسلام ابوالقاسم ميگفتند؟
✨این مقاله ی جامع را مطالعه کنید و به دوستان هدیه دهید
▪️کاری از تیم مدیریتی سایت و کانال نقدی بر اسلام
www.eslam.nu
آیا پیامبر اسلام ایرانی بود؟ آیا داستان حمله اعراب به ایران جعلی است؟
گفته میشود واژهٔ تاجیک، از واژهٔ پارسی میانهٔ «تازیک»، گرفته شده که بهطور سنتی به معنای «عرب» ترجمه میشده است. در آغاز قرن بیستم، خاورشناس مشهور روسی، واسیلی بارتولد، نوشت که تازیکها یا تاجیکها در اصل به نام قبیلهٔ بنو طی، یکی از قبایل شمال عربستان، عرب نامیده میشدند. زبانهای ایرانی پسوند قومی «چیک» را، به واژهٔ عربی «طی»، افزودند و «طیچیک»،…
ویدیوی امروز، بازهم، از از دکتر اسمیت و بررسی یک مصاحبه جنجالی، در اعتراف به تغییر یافتن قرآن در طول زمان میباشد. در ویدیوهای قبلی دکتر اسمیت، به یک مصاحبه اشاره کرده بود که در آن، یکی از بزرگترین متخصصین قرآن، به ناچار اعتراف میکند، که قرآن امروزی نسخه دست چندمی است که به دست ما رسیده و نمیتواند همان نسخه اصلی باشد، که جبرئیل به محمد داده است.
براى ديدن نسخه اصلی این ویدیو، بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
داستانهاى قرآن اعتبار تاريخى ندارند!
در این ویدئو، به برخی از داستانهای قرآن اشاره شده و اینکه هیچ زمان مشخصی برای آنها تعیین نشده است. یکی از این داستانها، در مورد طوفان نوح است، اما، قرآن، به زمان و مکان این طوفان اشاره نکرده و کسی نمیتواند بفهمد که تاریخ این طوفان چه وقتی بوده و یا چه مکانهایی را در بر گرفته بوده است.
براى ديدن نسخه كامل اين ويديو بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
لايك كردن ويديو ميتواند به الگوريتم يوت…
دکتر اسمیت: کتاب قرآن حدود ۱۰۰ سال پیش نوشته شده
امروز یک قسمت دیگر از ویدیوهای دکتر اسمیت را برایتان دوبله کرده ام. در این ویدیو، دکتر اسمیت، به ۶ قرآن قدیمی که در موزه های مختلف وجود دارند، پرداخته و ایرادات اساسی، مخصوصن تفاوت آیات آنها با قرآن امروزی را، با دقت بررسی میکند.
براى ديدن نسخه كامل اين ويديو بر روى اين لينك كليك كنيد.
لطفا ویدیو را لایک کنید و با دوستانتان به اشتراک بگذارید.
👍135❤🔥10👎8😁5👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @naghde_eslamm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@naghde_eslamm edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @naghde_eslamm as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دروغها و خرافات اسلام @islie · 21,829 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
کتابخانه تلگرام @Library_Telegram · 110,029 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI @Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,321 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
شب نشيني هالو @sh_n_halloo · 25,658 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
I am Zeus @zeus110 · 23,006 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نقدى بر اسلام” (@naghde_eslamm), 36,809 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naghde_eslamm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.