Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ramadan Crypton

Channel

Ramadan Crypton

@RamadanCrypton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,425subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774476752
TypeChannel
Username@RamadanCrypton
Created22 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RamadanCrypton

Growth

7,4257,5157,4707 August 2026 — 7,515 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,515 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,508 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,493 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,478 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,461 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,449 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,440 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,434 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,431 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,425 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,412–7,529 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 20:197,425-6
1 Sept 2026, 22:477,431-3
29 Aug 2026, 18:027,434-6
26 Aug 2026, 17:397,440-9
23 Aug 2026, 15:587,449-12
20 Aug 2026, 00:117,461-17
16 Aug 2026, 21:437,478-15
13 Aug 2026, 04:287,493-15
10 Aug 2026, 08:427,508-7
7 Aug 2026, 04:307,515no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:227,515first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 7,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held33 (27 May 202628 August 2026)
Views total20,716
Reactions total243
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

893 reactions across 31 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥45851.3%
35940.2%
👏343.81%
👌313.47%
🤩30.336%
🤯30.336%
🎉20.224%
😱20.224%
🕊10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 33 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RamadanCrypton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC806 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ Circle, эмитент USDC, стал главным спонсором футбольного клуба Chelsea. Все, ЛЧ теперь точно заберут 😅

🔥3

27 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,410 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🇦🇫 Талибы запретили криптовалюту в Афганистане.

5🤩3🤯2👏1

26 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,560 views13 reactions7 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, я здесь не пытаюсь дать вам какой-то намёк на конкретные криптовалюты, и копать исключительно в направлении AI здесь тоже не нужно… Точнее, если вы анализируете рынок — конечно, нужно!… Но конкретно в этих публикациях я говорю о гораздо более общем тезисе. Поэтому читайте, пожалуйста, чуть внимательнее 🙂 Здесь речь именно об инфраструктуре — о механизме, где задействовано множество разных винтиков, а не об од

🔥8👏5

24 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈1,570 views18 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Экономика автономных агентов потребует собственной инфраструктуры. Часть 2 — криптоинфраструктура как слой координации Если развитие ИИ действительно движется в сторону множества автономных агентов, сама логика цифрового взаимодействия начинает меняться… Один агент ставит задачу другому. Другой выполняет её. Они обмениваются результатами. Происходят расчёты. Возникают обязательства. И всё это потенциально мож

15🔥3

24 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,350 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ИИ — это не продукт сегодняшнего дня, а инфраструктура завтрашней экономики Мы часто оцениваем новые технологии через призму того, насколько хорошо они работают прямо сейчас. С ИИ сегодня примерно та же история. Да, текущие системы далеки от идеала. Они ошибаются, генерируют странные решения, требуют контроля человека, а некоторые задачи по-прежнему нельзя доверять им без серьёзной экспертизы. Но всё это не отмен

🔥223👏2

24 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,440 views113 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026

Мой взгляд на следующий этап цифровой экономики В последнее время я всё чаще думаю о том, что крипторынок нужно рассматривать шире, чем просто как финансовый инструмент. Одно из самых интересных направлений, на мой взгляд, находится на пересечении ИИ, криптографии и программируемой экономики. Реальность такова, что рабочая и деловая инфраструктура всё быстрее дополняется взаимодействием «человек → машина», постепе

🔥9113👏9

24 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,500 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📈 ИИ-агенты уже расходуют примерно в 5 раз больше токенов, чем обычные пользователи в чатах — люди наращивают потребление постепенно, а у агентов оно растёт почти вертикально.

2

22 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,780 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

The Sandbox, вероятно, взломали — злоумышленник наминтил 14.9 млрд токенов SAND, биржи уже начали закрывать вводы и выводы.

😱2

20 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,170 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 Пока классический IT жил по закону Мура и примерно удваивал мощность раз в два года, потребление токенов через OpenRouter сейчас удваивается примерно каждые 11 недель. Темп совсем другой — и это ещё до момента, когда ИИ начнёт массово помогать создавать следующее поколение самого себя...

19 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈2,280 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Почему смотрим именно ETH/BTC? ETH уже получил важную регуляторную ясность: SEC отдельно обозначила позицию по staking, а сам ETH рассматривается как digital commodity. Поэтому сейчас интересно, сможет ли CLARITY закрепить эту тенденцию уже на законодательном уровне. Если регуляторная ясность даст Ethereum больше дополнительного спроса, чем Bitcoin, это должно проявиться в опережающем росте ETH относительно BTC. Име

🔥144

19 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈2,220 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ETH/BTC: После длительного нисходящего канала ETH/BTC выходит вверх. Ключевые точки впереди — голосование по CLARITY Act после 15 сентября и промежуточные выборы в США в ноябре. Если сценарий отработает, можем увидеть сильное движение ETH относительно BTC.

🔥113

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @RamadanCrypton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мансур | Исламские Финансы Инвестиции
@mansurfinance1 · 33,747
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026
H O R I Z O N
@horizonweb · 256,944
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
Мурад ЛяРиба
@lariba_murad · 63,726
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
CRYPTO LUDIK
@gamerludoman · 435,457
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
РОМАНОВИЧ
@romanovich_ser · 38,791
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
NODGOIN
@nodgoin · 256,766
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
HASBILAND
@hasbiland · 61,657
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 56,325
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Спросите у Расула
@askrasul · 94,777
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ramadan Crypton” (@RamadanCrypton), 7,425 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RamadanCrypton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.