Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RateXAi Scoring Systems

Channel

RateXAi Scoring Systems

@RateX_Network

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,906subscribers

-776 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001954430104
TypeChannel
Username@RateX_Network
DescriptionRateX.Ai Build Web3 Native AI On/Off-Chain like BlackRock. Google comes to you, not you to it. 👽 Frens @INSIDERAA_bot / Contact us: [email protected]
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RateX_Network

Growth

20,90621,68221,2947 August 2026 — 21,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,682 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,622 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,583 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,540 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,498 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,467 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,430 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,389 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,366 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,338 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,317 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,281 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,234 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,184 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,156 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,132 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,126 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,090 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,074 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,056 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,017 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,975 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,947 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,906 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net -776. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,790–21,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:1620,906-41
2 Sept 2026, 06:3720,947-28
1 Sept 2026, 06:3720,975-42
31 Aug 2026, 09:3621,017-39
30 Aug 2026, 08:5721,056-18
29 Aug 2026, 12:0521,074-16
28 Aug 2026, 14:5221,090-36
27 Aug 2026, 12:2321,126-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:3621,132-24
25 Aug 2026, 13:3421,156-28
24 Aug 2026, 13:4921,184-50
22 Aug 2026, 22:4821,234-47
21 Aug 2026, 13:3721,281-36
20 Aug 2026, 16:1521,317-21
19 Aug 2026, 14:2521,338-28
18 Aug 2026, 17:0421,366-23
17 Aug 2026, 13:2821,389-41
16 Aug 2026, 08:1821,430-37
14 Aug 2026, 19:5421,467-31
13 Aug 2026, 13:0721,498first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
8
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

300 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13244.0%
👍8829.3%
5317.7%
🐳279.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 13:11 UTC≈4,960 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍158🐳3

10 Apr 2026, 15:11 UTC976 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Following RateXAI was already enough to make money. Subscription simply accelerates the process. On Feb 12, we published the full Post-TGE report on $TAO at ~$157 → +136% since. On Mar 6, we made it public at ~$177 → +109% in <1 month. Now the market is finally paying attention. But it always works the same way: structure → narrative → crowd. That was the point of the report. Our thesis was based on structural ana

👍15125🐳1

20 Feb 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,600 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Investment Demo Day: RateXAI × Fintch @Fintchone Zoom: 26 Feb, 19:00 (MSC) Join instructions (Save) https://us06web.zoom.us/meetings/89946181238/invitations?signature=jq7bTfcWlbPPIQn0FcquZwKpL6dpYMTA3segyCUrVnM Together with Fintch we are hosting a private Investment Demo Day. We will break down: • Agentic AI Trading revolution • Risk First DEX Trading Terminal • Big Data scoring architecture • our go-to-market

18👍87🐳1

17 Feb 2026, 10:11 UTC≈10,600 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Our team continues to focus on the upcoming release of at least 8 products. RateXAI TradeBrowser

104👍2🐳1

6 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTC≈11,500 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍72🐳2

6 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTC≈10,600 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Solana is at $89, down 70% from the ATH, and it looks like the market has written it off. But in the RateXAI Post-TGE model it scores AA 85/100, with near best-in-class tokenomics: 91% of supply already circulating, dilution risk around +14%, fair value ratio 0.92x (about $55B fair value versus ~$50B market cap). On real usage it is not a “promise” category anymore: ~70M transactions per day, 4M+ active addresses w

👍85🐳1

3 Feb 2026, 16:43 UTC667 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Read our thread on X https://x.com/RateX_Network/status/2006116627683701132

4👍2🐳1

3 Feb 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

This is already a fact

6🐳4👍3

3 Feb 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

New standards are coming

7👍4🐳3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RateX_Network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PHI Network
@PHICoreTeam · 41,604
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RateXAi Scoring Systems” (@RateX_Network), 20,906 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RateX_Network.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.