Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Riflette_Re - Stefano Re

Channel

Riflette_Re - Stefano Re

@Riflette_Re

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,684subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577564333
TypeChannel
Username@Riflette_Re
Created12 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Riflette_Re

Growth

6,6706,6856,677.57 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,670 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,685 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,683 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,685 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,684 subscribers6,6847 August 20264 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,668–6,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 21:416,684-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:186,685+2
29 Aug 2026, 06:256,683-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:586,685+10
22 Aug 2026, 19:066,675+5
19 Aug 2026, 02:126,670-7
12 Aug 2026, 23:466,677+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:156,675-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:376,678no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:016,678first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 6,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held23 (24 June 202619 August 2026)
Views total5,615
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

631 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25840.9%
👏9014.3%
8713.8%
🔥8413.3%
😱365.71%
😁294.60%
👎203.17%
🤬152.38%
👌121.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC655 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Sam Altman, CEO di OpenAI. "Tra dieci anni, vivrete nel massimo comfort, ma non avrete alcuna libertà, non avrete alcuna autonomia. La AI vi fornirà ogni bene materiale, ma vivrete per servirla. Sarà un perfetto Stato di Sorveglianza."

🤬15

Signed Stefano Re

17 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Domenica 30 agosto sarò al Festival Nuova Umanità presso VILLAGE ALESSANDRIA San Salvatore Monferrato, AL

11

Signed Stefano Re

11 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,840 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Adesso esce tutto quanto. Fauci sapeva del rischio di aborto causato dal vaccino, eppure ha pubblicamente sostenuto il suo utilizzo per le donne incinte. Non lo scrive un complottista o un negazionista, lo scrive il New York Post. I senatori Johnson e Paul presentano le cifre: «Gli autori affermavano un tasso di aborto spontaneo del 12,6%, ma i dati grezzi rivelavano un tasso di aborto spontaneo dell'82% nelle do

👍39

Signed Stefano Re

2 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈14,900 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Dal diario di Anthony Fauci, 13 agosto 2022: "Abbiamo convinto il CDC a non dichiarare che i vaccini non hanno alcuna efficacia nel prevenire infezione e contagio." "Il motivo è che questa dichiarazione contraddirebbe la raccomandazione alla popolazione di farsi inoculare il vaccino BA.5 bivalente a settembre. Inoltre, minerebbe gli sforzi del Dipartimento di Giustizia per rendere obbligatoria la vaccinazione." Ave

🔥52

Signed Stefano Re

27 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,500 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Questa non dovete perdervela. SE VUOI ESSERE LIBERO, PUOI. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oW1oP-CBffc

🔥10

Signed Stefano Re

18 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,170 views43 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ritengo che nello specifico andrebbe modificato il criterio di valutazione della legittima difesa a favore del difensore in tre ambiti precisi. 1. L’ottica difensiva In generale, andrebbe garantita al difensore una ampia benevolenza pregiudiziale nel valutare le sue reazioni. 2. La valutazione della minaccia Occorre poi che la valutazione della minaccia venga considerata dal punto di vista del difensore. In tal sen

👏43

Signed Stefano Re

18 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,470 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ho elaborato da decenni una riforma della legittima difesa tutta mia. Fa parte di una serie molto ampia di proposte di riforma che toccano l'intera struttura dello Stato, dal mondo del lavoro alle politiche economiche, dalla salute all'educazione, dal codice penale alla difesa, eccetera eccetera. Chissà che prima o dopo non venga presentata seriamente agli elettori da qualche partito o movimento. Ecco un sunto della

👍14

Signed Stefano Re

18 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,490 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

(2di3) https://t.me/Riflette_Re/1171 « Prec Il modello della belligeranza Tanto la violenza tra individui quanto quella tra stati sono dei conflitti. Prendiamo a modello il caso di una guerra. Se uno stato invia truppe armate nel territorio di un altro stato, si parla di dichiarazione di guerra di fatto. Durante una guerra, sparare al nemico non è considerato un reato. In tempo di pace nessuno dovrebbe sparare a nes

16

Signed Stefano Re

17 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,190 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Nuovo superfilm biografico di Netflix Ray Gosling è BARAK OBAMA il primo presidente di colore degli USA (Perché quando il nero è bianco, il bianco è nero) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ktee8vjIW-k

👎11

Signed Stefano Re

16 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈4,870 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Se fossi un medico che ha scelto di non fare / far fare da cavia, per questo fossi stato sospeso o licenziato e oggi mi venisse offerta la reintegrazione, la rifiuterei e chiederei invece un risarcimento sostanzioso per danni morali e materiali. La proposta di reintegrazione stessa dimostra quel che ogni persona sana di mente sa già bene: che la sanzione subita era ingiusta. Perché mai dovrei tornare a lavorare per

👎9

Signed Stefano Re

14 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,810 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Con Andrea Tosatto, si parla di metacomunicazione e tecniche di interrogatorio. https://youtu.be/5oCETUPGLdw?is=QPzhPGD5HJhOn1Ny

21

Signed Stefano Re

12 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC≈4,120 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

C'è chi crede che nel 2020 sia scoppiata una pandemia. C'è chi crede che non sia vero. C'è chi crede che siamo stati sulla luna. C'è chi crede che non sia vero. C'è chi crede che Israele stia compiendo un genocidio. C'è chi crede che non sia vero. C'è chi crede che la Russia voglia invadere l'Europa. C'è chi crede che non sia vero. C'è chi crede che l'11 settembre 2001 un gruppo di terroristi islamici abbia abbattuto

🔥22

Signed Stefano Re

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Riflette_Re. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Silver Nervuti
@silvernervuti · 42,506
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Paolo Bellavite
@PaoloBellavite · 31,429
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Riflette_Re - Stefano Re” (@Riflette_Re), 6,684 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Riflette_Re.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.