Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Leopoldo Salmaso || No "vaccini" OGMM

Channel

Leopoldo Salmaso || No "vaccini" OGMM

@leopoldosalmaso

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,143subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320008287
TypeChannel
Username@leopoldosalmaso
Created16 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/leopoldosalmaso

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,1438,1928,167.57 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,191 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,189 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,183 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,176 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,174 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,167 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,164 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,153 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,151 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,144 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,143 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,136–8,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:568,143-1
14 Sept 2026, 23:228,144-7
11 Sept 2026, 13:578,151-2
7 Sept 2026, 04:388,153-11
30 Aug 2026, 12:138,164-3
27 Aug 2026, 13:538,167-7
24 Aug 2026, 23:478,174-4
21 Aug 2026, 02:028,178+2
17 Aug 2026, 20:288,176-7
14 Aug 2026, 20:568,183-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:118,189-2
7 Aug 2026, 20:118,191-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:308,192no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:208,192first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

602 reactions across 33 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23438.9%
15926.4%
🤮11418.9%
🔥6410.6%
😱315.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC849 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

THE ITALIAN JOB Ospedale di Palermo pubblica bando per concorso ma pubblica già anche la graduatoria dei vincitori… peccato che il concorso si debba ancora tenere. Ora voglio vedere chi chiede trasparenza se avrà ancora il coraggio di lamentarsi.🤡🤡 UNISCITI a🔗Leonardo SANTI

🤮303🔥3

21 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC958 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @EpochChronicleFile

[Epoch Chronicle - 1] “IL CASO FAUCI E IL FUMO NEGLI OCCHI” Benvenuti nella puntata numero 1 di Epoch Chronicle, il podcast che commenta le cronache della nostra epoca. Oggi parleremo delle accuse mosse al Dottor Anthony Fauci negli Stati Uniti per la gestione della pandemia Covid Nota AI Act [2/8/2026]: Testo a cura di Epoch Chronicle, Audio generato con tecnologia IA di sintesi vocale Epoch Chronicle

1

21 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC940 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Sono burattini sia Fauci che Trump che Biden, ma intanto non è male inchiodarne qualcuno...

👍11

21 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC770 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @PaoloBellavite

Ormai non ci fregano più! O almeno non fregano più quelli che sanno come stanno le cose… Il nuovo intruglio mRNA Moderna che dovrebbe contrastare l’influenza a vedere i loro stessi dati è LEGGERMENTE più efficace del vaccino tradizionale fatto coi virus uccisi (farlocco), ma produce MOLTI PIÙ EFFETTI AVVERSI GRAVI. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-fda-data-reanalysis-sent?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post-expande

🤮2😱2

20 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC863 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @PaoloBellavitePhoto

Scandaloso Il BMJ ha ritrattato un articolo del 2024 che dimostrava il fallimento dei “vaccini” covid. Tali intrugli non solo non avevano ridotto la mortalità da virus che si era manifestata all’inizio della pandemia - e nonostante l’arrivo del ceppo Omicron meno patogeno -, ma avevano aggiunto i loro effetti avversi. Un articolo che era stato esaminato nei dettagli per 9 mesi dai revisori era troppo dirompente per

6🔥6

19 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,060 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ancora sui vaccini dei polli Rilancio un recente intervento di Manola Bozzelli e Valeria Panetta (Ass. Arbitrium) Non fare che si dica di te "sei proprio un pollo!" 1) il vaccino contro l'aviaria non è sperimentale, a esserlo è il progetto pilota che lo riguarda: DIVA e che finalmente ci darà conto degli effetti della somministrazione di questi vaccini, che avviene da oltre vent'anni! 2) è davvero un progetto imp

6🤮4👍1

19 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,190 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Chiunque, laureato a Padova in una disciplina medico-biologica, voglia fare gruppo con me per opporsi alla porcata del dottorato a Fauci, faccia richiesta qua: https://t.me/+_E_ji4zjXzo0OGY0

👍14

19 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,380 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤮32🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @leopoldosalmaso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ContiamoCi!
@associazione_ContiamoCi · 25,794
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Leopoldo Salmaso || No "vaccini" OGMM” (@leopoldosalmaso), 8,143 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leopoldosalmaso.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.