Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paolo Sceusa - Marcia delle Libertà Pace Evoluzione

Channel

Paolo Sceusa - Marcia delle Libertà Pace Evoluzione

@SceusaP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,964subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447559760
TypeChannel
Username@SceusaP
Created20 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SceusaP

Growth

17,96418,09818,0317 August 2026 — 18,098 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,096 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,090 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,085 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,080 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,079 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,075 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,071 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,060 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,050 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,048 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,038 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,027 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,020 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,012 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,015 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,016 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,007 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,001 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,996 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,991 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,990 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,984 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,982 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,979 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,975 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,964 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 32 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,944–18,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 13:0017,964-11
5 Sept 2026, 08:2117,975-4
3 Sept 2026, 09:5817,979-3
2 Sept 2026, 06:1217,982-2
1 Sept 2026, 07:4617,984-6
31 Aug 2026, 10:5817,990-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:4417,991-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:3617,996-5
28 Aug 2026, 20:0618,001-6
27 Aug 2026, 18:3018,007-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:4418,016+1
25 Aug 2026, 20:0318,015+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:2718,012-8
23 Aug 2026, 06:1818,020-7
20 Aug 2026, 19:2818,027-11
19 Aug 2026, 20:5618,038-10
18 Aug 2026, 20:2618,048-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:3618,050-6
16 Aug 2026, 21:3818,056-4
15 Aug 2026, 14:5518,060first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 17,964 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,810
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held37 (5 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total72,100
Reactions total1,678
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 32s
Average length
3m 16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,125 reactions across 35 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,46346.8%
77524.8%
👏62319.9%
👌511.63%
🔥381.22%
🙏371.18%
270.864%
🤝250.8%
🤩220.704%
🏆210.672%
🕊160.512%
🥰120.384%
🤗80.256%
❤‍🔥70.224%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,760 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://www.instagram.com/p/DcgtDoFCh0M/

👍5

Signed Sceusa Paolo

29 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈2,380 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8FkqqAT

👍9

Signed Sceusa Paolo

29 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,570 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Buongiorno a tutti. Eccovi un’analisi che ancora non avete trovato da nessuna parte https://youtu.be/OO8nx0g-ezc?is=VMWa2eW3SW73b_g8

👍34👏71🤩1

Signed Sceusa Paolo

27 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈3,800 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

Cari amici, parecchio tempo fa, quando il tema era di gran moda, una rivista mi chiese di scriverle un mio articolo sui famigerati “Epstein Files”. Li ricordate ancora? Nessuno ne parla più. Quella rivista poi sospese le sue uscite e allora, per contrastare l’odiato dimenticatoio nazionale, ne parlo io, qui. Vi rassegno dunque quell’inedito articolo, per il vostro sollazzo e per la vostra informazione.

👍7311👏7🔥4🙏2

Signed Sceusa Paolo

27 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈3,470 views87 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Riflessioni e dubbi antelucani: ma se le donne ucraine vanno al fronte e poi i russi le ammazzano, saranno messe nel conto dei femminicidi? 🤔🤔 E noi in italia siamo così costernati e contriti per i nostri femminicidi, perché se no poi abbiamo meno donne da mandare a farsi ammazzare sul fronte russo? 🤔🤔 🤔

👏37👍21👌1312🔥3🥰1

Signed Sceusa Paolo

22 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈5,070 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://t.me/c/1557270200/113643

👍8

Signed Sceusa Paolo

20 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈6,490 views347 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Francesca, che mi vede su TikTok, a proposito del link che ho postato ieri qui sopra, mi ha mandato un messaggio carico ancora della sofferenza provata nel periodo della feroce discriminazione che abbiamo dovuto affrontare. E allora ri-posto, questa volta in chiaro, affinché sia visibile da tutti, quel post di TikTok, al quale voglio aggiungere queste mie parole di sdegno e di condanna nell’intento di riassumere i mo

245👏59👍19🤝8🙏8❤‍🔥6🤗2

Signed Sceusa Paolo

19 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈4,500 views126 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Più spregevoli di trump mi appaiono soltanto quei deficienti che ancora insistono nel pensare e nel dire che egli abbia “un piano per la salvezza dell’umanità dal male”. Ce ne sono diversi anche in italia. Se ve ne sono anche fra gli iscritti di questo canale, li pregherei di sloggiare. Sciò!

👍89👏2155🔥4🤝2

Signed Sceusa Paolo

19 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈4,660 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8LS1PuS

Signed Sceusa Paolo

17 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈5,410 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN88KXBbA

👍193👏1🔥1

Signed Sceusa Paolo

16 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈6,010 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Buongiorno a tutti 🌞 Occhio che c’è uno che usa un profilo copiato dal mio (non clonato, solo copiato), vi scrive e vi chiede soldi. Segnalate e bloccate, per favore. Quindi, sempre attenti alle bufale 😃🤗

👍111👌7🤩75

Signed Sceusa Paolo

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @SceusaP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@SceusaP edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IppocrateOrg
@IppocrateOrg · 34,551
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paolo Sceusa - Marcia delle Libertà Pace Evoluzione” (@SceusaP), 17,964 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SceusaP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.