Channel
@Rooyado
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
900subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001251022140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rooyado |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rooyado |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 900 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 903 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 906 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 910 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 911 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 911 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 76.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍️ میدانم، خطر میکنم. برای آن هم خطر میکنم که بهتر بدانم. اخلاق کهنه توصیه میکرد که از خطر بگریزیم. ولی اخلاق نو به ما یاد داده است که آنکه خطر نمیکند هیچچیز ندارد. جان شيفته رومن رولان @Rooyado
❤2
Signed Meghdad
من در واقع درون یک اکنونِ میانانسانی و درون افقی گشوده از انسانیت قرار دارم: من خود را واقعاً درون یک چارچوب زایشی [generative framework] میدانم، در جریان وحدتیافتهٔ یک تحول تاریخی که در آن این اکنون، اکنونِ انسانیت است؛ و جهانی که این انسانیت از آن آگاهی دارد، یک اکنونِ تاریخی است که دارای گذشتهای تاریخی و آیندهای تاریخی است.» (بحران، §۷۱) Science and the Life- World Essays on Husserl’s ‘Crisis of Eu ro pe a…
Signed Meghdad
همانطور که نور هم میتواند موج باشد و هم ذره (دو توصیف متفاوت از یک واقعیت واحد)، رابطه ذهن و مغز نیز چنین است ذهن و بدن دو ویژگی جداییناپذیر اما غیرقابل تقلیل به یکدیگر در یک سیستم واحد هستند غریزه آگاهی» (The Consciousness Instinct) اثر مایکل گازانیگا، @Rooyado
Signed Meghdad
اما همانگونه که هوسرل متافیزیکِ مطلقگرا را رد میکند، از پذیرشِ ضدّمتافیزیکِ تاریخگرایانهای نیز که بهگونهای ناسازگار، امکان هر حقیقتِ فراتاریخی را انکار میکند، سر باز میزند. پدیدارشناسی هرگز نه یک متافیزیک بوده است و نه یک ضدّمتافیزیک؛ بلکه چیزی شبیه به یک برنامهٔ پژوهشی، یک پروژه بوده است. و برای هوسرل نیز، پدیدارشناسی همچنان همین باقی میماند: پروژهای برای دستیابی به جهانشمولی، که در عین حال از خاصبودگی …
Signed Meghdad
🌺 #علماء به کار خود مشغولند و چیزی که ندارند #درد_دین است! ✍حسین جعفری ❇️بخشی از دفاعیه #شیخ_اشراق! 💥شمایان اگر به دنبال #مبارزه با فساد هستید، به سراغ کسانی بروید که #خون مردم را می آشامند و پلک نمی زنند. گیرم که من در انزوای خود رقصی کرده یا خدای نخواسته شرابی نوشیده ام، این کجا و آن همه #تفرعن علما و امرا کجا؟ ✅شیخ محبوس در تبادل نظر با ماردینی از مشایخ دیار بکر این چنین بی پروا بر باطل می تازد: "حکام و امرا…
Signed Meghdad
«کتاب آینه است؛ اگر میمونی در آن بنگرد، نمیتوان انتظار داشت قدیسی از آن بیرون بیاید.» "A book is a mirror: if an ape looks into it, no apostle can look out" گئورگ کریستوف لیختنبرگ Sudelbücher (Aphorismen) @Rooyado
👍2
Signed Meghdad
آنچه هوسرل «پارادوکس سوبژکتیویتهٔ انسانی» مینامد؛ یعنی این واقعیت که انسان، از یک سو سوژهٔ جهان است و از سوی دیگر، خود شیئی در درون جهان. (بحران، §53). این همان مسئلهٔ نسبت میان سوبژکتیویتهٔ استعلایی و سوبژکتیویتهٔ تجربی است. Science and the Life- World Essays on Husserl’s ‘Crisis of Eu ro pe an Sciences’ Edited by David Hyder and Hans- Jörg Rheinberger @Rooyado
❤1
Signed Meghdad
مقاله فلسفه درمان رفت تاملی در نسبت های زیسته رحم و جنین و گسست های امکان زایش به مثابه مرگ نابهنگام https://civilica.com/doc/2623121/ مقاله چاپ از دوست خوبم احسان براهینی
👍1
Signed Meghdad
بهطرز عجیبی، گمان میکنم ژاک دریدا در بخشی از اندیشهی هوسرل وفادار ماند، آنجا که این ایده را برجسته کرد که جمله و نوشتار مقدم بر گفتار است و بر آن تقدم دارد. اما مشکل اینجاست که خود هوسرل، هنگامی که به سالهای پیری رسیده بود، دیگر ظاهراً به خودِ عقل در حالِ عمل نگاه نمیکرد. او گمان میکرد که ما بهوسیلهی لایههایی تقریباً غیرقابل حفاری از رسوبات، از بداهتهای نخستین جدا شدهایم. Science and the Life- World Essa…
❤1
Signed Meghdad
اگر مرگ یک توهم باشد چه؟ نظریهٔ زیستمحوری (Biocentrism) که توسط دکتر رابرت لانزا مطرح شده، میگوید آگاهی بنیادیترین مؤلفهٔ واقعیت است و شاید مرگ آنگونه که تصور میکنیم پایان نباشد. این دیدگاه با الهام از برخی ایدههای مکانیک کوانتومی استدلال میکند که فضا و زمان ساختههای ذهناند؛ بنابراین، مرگ میتواند نوعی گذار باشد، نه یک پایان مطلق. با این حال، زیستمحوری یک نظریهٔ علمیِ پذیرفتهشده نیست و هیچ شواهد علمی معت…
❤2
Signed Meghdad
پژوهشهایی اشاره دارد که نشان میدهند شهود ممکن است فراتر از غریزه باشد و شامل پاسخهای فیزیولوژیک بدن (مانند تغییر ریتم قلب و امواج مغزی) چند ثانیه قبل از رویدادهای تصادفی باشد. این پژوهشها عمدتاً از مؤسسه HeartMath و Institute of Noetic Sciences میآیند. @Rooyado
❤2
Signed Meghdad
Lonely London
❤6🥰1
Signed Meghdad
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rooyado. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رویاد” (@Rooyado), 900 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rooyado.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.