Channel
@RosesWishingWell
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
905subscribers
+46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633191054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RosesWishingWell |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RosesWishingWell |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 905 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 903 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 896 | +34 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 862 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 864 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 859 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 859 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
This has a CTO team on it and everything looks good, i saw they said when CTO lead wakes up they will make a quasi X account this is the OG jimothy 🔥 🐕 https://x.com/i/status/2078384151963869433 BdmmbhuqmMcswTCpP5Dy9H6E87ZqDMULVAWdzu4ZhqTS
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
https://x.com/NotMyShrekSol/status/2067092063624298874
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
This is already got over 20mil views on x new shrek trailer I think it could get trending viral
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
FiYet7jahT3f41x9uGnHr5jTES5okG4GosVVehQhpump
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
Do i drop a 10k market cap ticker?
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
Looks undervalued
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
4447GxcPnFM9r4BX7jDaSgEu4MtuvL9hqJyGUi1Gpump
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
Multi-player arena game all working under 100k? Entry?
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
https://x.com/gengaremon/status/2063030882680942845 Bullish on tode My first thread since 2023 take a read
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
10x away from ATH
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
Tode beginning or end? Can be good opportunity
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
8RRojEU8nGWoCh5N11LLK2GJBNRUzPoH4rUz8ibCpump
Signed Lüh Röœse (shilling 100 CA's)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RosesWishingWell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rose & friends Risky Wishing Well of Plays” (@RosesWishingWell), 905 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RosesWishingWell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.