Channel
@RubiGlobalChannel
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
52,290subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001585913100 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RubiGlobalChannel |
| Description | Cα»ng Δα»ng khai thΓ‘c tΓ i sαΊ£n sα» Rubi. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RubiGlobalChannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 52,290 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 52,290 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 November 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9,292 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 5,672 | 61.0% | |
| π₯ | 830 | 8.93% | |
| π | 618 | 6.65% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 514 | 5.53% | |
| π₯° | 280 | 3.01% | |
| π | 260 | 2.80% | |
| π | 248 | 2.67% | |
| π | 229 | 2.46% | |
| π | 156 | 1.68% | |
| π€© | 128 | 1.38% | |
| π€ | 79 | 0.85% | |
| β‘ | 76 | 0.818% | |
| π | 69 | 0.743% | |
| π | 69 | 0.743% | |
| π | 43 | 0.463% | |
| π | 13 | 0.14% | |
| π | 8 | 0.086% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 9,292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2024 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Due to the overwhelming number of Validator applications, we have updated the application to add a "Cancel Validator application" button. Applications submitted more than 3 days ago will have this option. After 3 days, this option will appear, allowing you to continue waiting for approval or cancel your application. If you cancel, your priority queue will also be canceled.
π323π₯86π47π23
Signed Andy Nguyen
In the early stages of KYC 1.6, we need to observe and evaluate how the system works. The amount of work will increase over time. But initially, assessing quality and establishing standards is more important.
π258π₯51π22π16π₯°14π1
Signed Andy Nguyen
Furthermore, I'm stopping the sending of invitations to minimize errors. In just 2 days, KYC was approved. Many low-quality accounts were approved. The automated QC system is ineffective, while the Validators are quite lax, constantly overlooking errors! I cannot accept this situation! I am monitoring everything. I want RUBI Network to achieve high quality in its community. Only then will RUBI Network become theβ¦
π170π₯28π17π13π8β‘4π€©3π3
Signed Andy Nguyen
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯99π₯°28π17π13π€12π€©5π4
Signed Andy Nguyen
Hi All Rubimily! β οΈ Please understand this! Those who have been granted the VALIDATOR role are responsible for: 1) maintaining the confidentiality of user profile information that you verify; 2) not marketing yourself as a Validator, as this poses a risk of bias and abuse of power. I hope that Validators will act cautiously and objectively, because of the value of the assets you are representing and protecting. β¦
π137π₯38π₯°12π6π€5π4π2π€©2
Signed Andy Nguyen
KYC version 1.5 will close. KYC profiles submitted in version 1.50: β’ Not yet KYC-submitted: - will be cancelled, but the fee will be retained, permission to create a new profile in version 1.6 will be granted (no refund for the fee difference). β’ Profiles currently showing errors: requiring user correction, if not yet corrected they will also be cancelled, but permission will still be retained.
π221π49π₯°40π₯19π9π€©7
Signed Andy Nguyen
We are done upgrading! This upgrade is only hardware focused. It is only partially effective (estimated to increase total performance by 35% compared to before). The congestion problem is only temporarily resolved, we will see congestion again soon. We are considering measures to maintain operations including. β’ algorithm optimization β’ suspending resource-consuming services β’ discussing horizontal infrastructure aβ¦
π2,290π591β€βπ₯382π₯264π117π76π€61π€©61
Signed Andy Nguyen
Photo, posted without a caption
π411π76β€βπ₯63π₯35π20π10π7
Signed Andy Nguyen
https://rubi.click/announcement-sudden-maintenance/330.html?lang=en
π132π28π8
Signed Andy Nguyen
It's not forbidden! people have the right to do with their assets. I just want to warn! let's look at the current value and current risks, we are even in the testnet stage. 2 million members is a temporary achievement, it's not the destination. Let's look at 2 or 3 years later. When the mainnet is done and the community can reach 20-30 million or more. rubi will be worth more. if rubi goes up more than 1$ now, it'β¦
π276π75π₯°48π13π11π₯3π1
Signed Andy Nguyen
https://rubi.click/risk-no-risk/329.html?lang-en
π133π29π₯25β‘6π6π5π₯°4
Signed Andy Nguyen
You need to pay a fee to get verified. Because the verifier will be paid for the verification work.
π237π57β€βπ₯41π₯°27π16π₯10π€©10π3
Signed Andy Nguyen
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RubiGlobalChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs. When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βRubi π Global Channelβ (@RubiGlobalChannel), 52,290 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RubiGlobalChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.