Channel
SIAM TRADING FX
@SIAM_TRADING_FX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,740subscribers
-184 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001450194234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SIAM_TRADING_FX |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SIAM_TRADING_FX |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 3,740 | +7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 3,733 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 3,725 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 3,727 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 3,734 | -20 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 3,754 | -24 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 3,778 | -59 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 3,837 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 3,849 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 3,864 | -7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 3,871 | -18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 3,889 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:13 | 3,889 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 3,906 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 3,926 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 3,913 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 3,922 | -21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 3,943 | -230 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 4,173 | +243 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 3,930 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Digitalcurrenciesmetaverse · 25,547
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 15 September 2026
@sigma_club_001 · 38,484
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
@SFxauusd1 · 1,829,969
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@SNIIPER1_GOLD · 75,799
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
@fforexNews · 28,704
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
@goldenwhaleforex333 · 211,723
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
@SAYAD_EL_FOREX · 39,897
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
@SultanOfGoldAlert · 11,232
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026
@malek_eldahab · 74,346
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
@SWELIUM · 29,896
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
@MT_TRADING00 · 41,782
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
@kingxauusd1 · 1,462,217
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@GoldZone_trade · 17,498
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
@MOSTASHAR_EL_GOLD · 397,301
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@Crypto_News95 · 26,790
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
@EGYPTIENPHARAOH · 35,437
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
@yourjop5 · 24,015
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 September 2026
@SouqToday · 87,118
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@AlattarrTrading · 25,458
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
@Eliitrade · 25,705
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
@ELHOTGOLD1 · 19,634
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@MoneyMaster111 · 31,049
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SIAM TRADING FX” (@SIAM_TRADING_FX), 3,740 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SIAM_TRADING_FX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.