https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSV7593VT/ تفاعل ي اخواتي🤍
🔥9❤6👌6👍6❤🔥4😍3👏2🤝2

Channel
@MT_TRADING00
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,826subscribers
-2,980 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002133325614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MT_TRADING00 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MT_TRADING00 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 32,826 | -52 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 32,878 | -34 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 32,912 | -70 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 32,982 | -264 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 33,246 | -150 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 33,396 | -58 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 33,454 | -63 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:26 | 33,517 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 33,599 | -92 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 33,691 | -61 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 33,752 | -148 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 33,900 | -28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 33,928 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 33,954 | -51 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 34,005 | -63 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 34,068 | -96 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 34,164 | -149 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 34,313 | -602 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 34,915 | -119 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 35,034 | first reading |
551 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 551 (7 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,526 |
| Reactions total | 16,263 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40,293 reactions across 551 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,078 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6,953 | 17.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6,941 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 6,939 | 17.2% | |
| 🤩 | 2,122 | 5.27% | |
| 👌 | 2,075 | 5.15% | |
| 🤝 | 2,075 | 5.15% | |
| 😍 | 2,069 | 5.13% | |
| 🙏 | 2,033 | 5.05% | |
| 👏 | 2,006 | 4.98% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.005% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 551 of the 551 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 551 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MT_TRADING00. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 551 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSV7593VT/ تفاعل ي اخواتي🤍
🔥9❤6👌6👍6❤🔥4😍3👏2🤝2
صباحكم كله رزق🤍
👍19🔥16❤🔥15❤13😍6👌5👏4🤝3
📣للتنظيم وسرعة الرد: جميع الاستفسارات الخاصة بـ: ✅ الانضمام للقنوات. ✅ MT RICH CLUB. ✅ MT VIP. ✅ الاشتراكات. ✅ التسجيل تحت وكالة MT. ✅ الإيداع والسحب. ✅ أي مشكلة في حساب التداول. 📩 التواصل يكون مع الدعم: @MT_TRADING_SUPPORT أما إذا كان الموضوع شخصيًا أو خاصًا بي او مشاركه ارباح، فتواصل معي مباشرة: @MohammedTarek00 ✅
❤🔥19❤12🔥11👍10👏6🤩5👌3🤝3
والخطوة الأخيرة… 👑 لو قررت تكون جزء من MT وتختار الـLevel المناسب ليك، كل اللي عليك تبعت لـ MT TRADING SUPPO٨RT وتقولهم أنت حابب تدخل أنهي نظام، وهما هيكملوا معاك كل خطوات التسجيل والدخول. Your move💙 MT — Built Different. @MT_TRADING_SUPPORT
🔥15❤🔥13❤12👍12👌5🤩5😍5🤝4
YOUR ACCESS. YOUR LEVEL.🖤 من النهارده، الدخول لعالم MT بقى له مستويين: VIP — للناس اللي عايزة الـFull Access. اشتراك شهري، وبتدخل مباشرة على الـPrivate System بكل تفاصيله وصفقاته. RICH CLUB — للناس المسجلة تحت الـIB بتاعنا. بدون Subscription، بدون رسوم شهرية… Just Access. كل مستوى له نظامه، وكل نظام له طريقته. Choose your level. Enter the system. Let the execution speak🍸
🔥20❤🔥14👍12❤9🤝6🙏4👏3😍3
THREE CHANNELS. THREE DIFFERENT LEVELS✅ من النهارده، كل قناة ليها نظامها، هدفها، وطريقتها الخاصة. MT_TRADING✅ لرؤية الـMarket، التحديثات اليومية، والمناطق اللي أنا مهتم بيها. MT_VIP💸 للتوصيات والصفقات الكاملة، من الـSession Setups للـDaily والـSwing. MT_RICH CLUB👑 لـMT System مختلف تمامًا… شغل سريع، أهداف قريبة، وتنفيذ مباشر وقت الفرص. مفيش قناة معمولة عشان تنافس التانية. كل واحدة معمولة عشان تقدم Value بشكل مخت…
👍19❤15❤🔥10🔥7👌6👏6🤝6🤩5
مش مجرد قناة مجانية… ومش نسخة من الـVIP✅
❤🔥17❤11👍11🔥11👏6😍6🙏6🤩4
MT_RICH CLUB👑 نادي الأثرياء هيكون FREE بالكامل. مفيش Subscription، مفيش رسوم شهرية، ومفيش اشتراك تدفعه للقناة. الشرط الوحيد؟ تكون مسجل وشغال تحت الـIB الخاص بالـBroker التابع لينا. أما النظام؟ هنا مختلف🔥 هدف واحد. Stop واحد. Execution واحد. شغل منظم، أهداف قريبة، وصفقات سريعة بأسلوب قريب من الـScalping… لكن بطريقة MT الخاصة😈 أنا بكون متواجد معاكم وقت الصفقات، وبنتابع الـMarket Session by Session. ولو السوق ادان…
🔥16👍14❤8❤🔥8👌8🤩6😍5🤝4
الخاصّة هتكون هي الـPremium Side of MT😈
❤🔥16👍13🔥12❤11👌7😍5🙏5👏3
أما الـVIP فالنظام هيكون مختلف تمامًا✅ من النهارده، أغلب التوصيات والصفقات هتكون داخل الـVIP، سواء كانت: ⚡️ Session Setups 🎯 Daily Trades 📈 Intraday Opportunities 💎 Swing Trades مش هنبقى مقيدين بعدد معين من الصفقات أو بنوع معين من التداول، الفكرة كلها إننا ندخل الفرصة اللي تستحق الدخول فقط. والأهم بالنسبة لي هو الشفافية: كل يوم هشارك في العامة الصفقات اللي نزلت داخل الـVIP بعد ما تحقق هدفها بإذن الله، عشان كل حا…
🔥16❤🔥14❤13👍11🤝6😍5🙏5🤩3
والأهم… المتابعة مش هتقل✅ بالعكس، هيكون ليك عندي تحديثات يومية للـMarket هشارك معاك رؤيتي للسوق، وأحددلك أهم مناطقي ومستويات اهتمامي أول بأول💙
❤16🔥14👍11👌8❤🔥7🤩6👏4😍4
NEW SYSTEM. NEW STANDARD✅ من النهارده، نظام القناة العامة هيتغير بالكامل. مش هدفنا إننا ننزل صفقات كتير لمجرد إن فيه حركة في السوق… الهدف إننا نستنى الفرصة الصح. 📌 من صفقة إلى صفقتين فقط يوميًا — حسب حالة الـMarket وجودة الفرص، ومفيش مواعيد ثابتة للصفقات. ممكن الصفقة تيجي بدري، ممكن آخر اليوم… وممكن لو السوق مش واضح مفيش صفقة من الأساس. Quality over Quantity. Always. المرحلة الجاية مش عن عدد الصفقات… عن قيمة كل…
👍17🔥15❤🔥14❤9🤝7🤩7👌3👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 551 posts we hold for @MT_TRADING00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MT_TRADING💸” (@MT_TRADING00), 32,826 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MT_TRADING00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.