Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,911–20,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 12:25
20,013
+1
5 Nov 2026, 10:56
20,012
-13
3 Nov 2026, 11:55
20,025
-11
2 Nov 2026, 08:41
20,036
-1
1 Nov 2026, 12:06
20,037
-7
31 Oct 2026, 13:58
20,044
-7
30 Oct 2026, 10:39
20,051
-3
29 Oct 2026, 09:45
20,054
+20
28 Oct 2026, 05:38
20,034
-8
27 Oct 2026, 04:57
20,042
+16
26 Oct 2026, 01:56
20,026
-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:26
20,032
+16
23 Oct 2026, 00:01
20,016
-3
22 Oct 2026, 01:17
20,019
-4
20 Oct 2026, 22:27
20,023
+2
19 Oct 2026, 17:30
20,021
+3
18 Oct 2026, 14:16
20,018
-3
17 Oct 2026, 11:50
20,021
-10
16 Oct 2026, 15:20
20,031
-3
15 Oct 2026, 16:50
20,034
first reading
Engagement
928 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.68%
avg views ÷ 20,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
536
179 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
179
of 928 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 160 of 179 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
928 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
95,889
Reactions total
9,964
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,000
Videos
≈272
Links
≈19,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
12,721 reactions across 734 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,499
27.5%
🔥
1,939
15.2%
👍
1,910
15.0%
👏
1,785
14.0%
💯
1,714
13.5%
🎉
1,681
13.2%
🥰
58
0.456%
🙏
23
0.181%
🤩
21
0.165%
😱
20
0.157%
🏆
14
0.11%
😍
13
0.102%
🫡
8
0.063%
👌
7
0.055%
🕊
7
0.055%
✍
4
0.031%
😢
4
0.031%
❤🔥
3
0.024%
🆒
3
0.024%
💔
3
0.024%
3 further kinds
5
0.039%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 749 of the 928 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,721 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 928 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 926 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @USDGoldusd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 928 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 179 posts held from the last 30 days (1.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نختتم هذا الأسبوع إلى الآن 🌙
دمتم بأمان الله 🤲 ونلقاكم على خير الأسبوع القادم إن شاء الله تعالى 🌟
عطلة سعيدة للجميع ☀️🕌
ولا تنسوا ذكر الله تعالى 💭💞
---
📿 - استغفر اللّٰه.
🌸 - سُبحان اللّٰه.
🌿 - الحمدللّٰه.
🕋 - لا إله إلا اللّٰه.
✨ - اللّٰهُ أكبر.
💫 - سُبحان اللّٰه و بحمدهِ.
🌟 - سُبحان اللّٰه العَظيم.
🧎 - استغفر اللّٰه و أتوبُ إليهِ.
⚡ - لا حول و لا قوة إلا باللّٰه.
🕊️ - اللهُمَّ صلِ علىٰ نبينا محمد ﷺ.
🌊 - لا إل…
👇 | جولدمان ساكس يخفض مستهدفات الذهب لعامي 2026 و2027
✔️ بنك جولدمان ساكس خفض توقعاته لأسعار الذهب العالمي، بسبب استمرار توجه الفيدرالي لتشديد السياسة النقدية وده بيضغط على الذهب
✔️ البنك خفض مستهدف الذهب بنهاية 2026 إلى 4150 دولار للأونصة بدل من 4650 دولار، وخفض توقعاته لنهاية 2027 إلى 4800 دولار بدل من 5400 دولار 📉
✔️ ورغم خفض المستهدفات لسه البنك شايف أن مشتريات البنوك المركزية هي الدعم الرئيسي للذهب، وتوقع ارت…
تحركات جوية مكثفة: رصد 8 طائرات تزويد بالوقود تابعة للقوات الجوية الأمريكية
في أجواء الإمارات وقطر والبحرين ومضيق هرمز والخليج وخليج عمان.
https://t.me/USDGoldusd
💰 | البنك الدولي يتوقع الذهب فوق 4000 دولار حتى 2028
✔ البنك الدولي توقع استمرار الذهب عند مستويات مرتفعة خلال السنوات المقبلة، وحط متوسط سعر 4600 دولار للأونصة في 2026، قبل تراجعه إلى 4250 دولار في 2027، ثم 4,000 دولار في 2028
✔ بالنسبة للفضة البنك الدولي توقع تصحيح أكبر بعد الأداء القوي الذي سجلته هذا العام؛ وتوقع متوسط السعر عند 70 دولار للأونصة في 2026، ثم انخفاضه إلى 62 دولار في 2027، و58 دولار في 2028 🔴
✔ ال…
🔥23🎉18💯17❤16👏13👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 928 posts we hold for @USDGoldusd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أخبار الفوركس @ForexNews24hours · 185,691 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
السوق اليوم @SouqToday · 86,753 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
القران الكريم ، اذكار ، ادعية ، ايات @DleelD · 19,791 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
الصرف اليوم - الجنيه المصري @SarfToday · 64,294 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
اسعار الذهب لحظيا بمصر 🇪🇬 @goldprice10000 · 296,134 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Abu Ghazal Trader In Forex @goldprice3 · 86,974 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
بوابة المتداولين Traders Gateway @GoldToday1111 · 25,018 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
اسعار الذهب الآن - Gold Price Now @goldpricenowlive · 77,679 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
سعر الذهب اليوم في مصر 🇪🇬 @goldprice10 · 19,794 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 September 2026
Hi @mGoldMm · 6 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
اخبار الفوركس Forex News @fforexNews · 28,869 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
نشرة اخبار الفوركس 📰 @ForexNewspaper · 126,638 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Gold price @goldratepric2020 · 28,151 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
اسعار الذهب و الفضة و الدولار 🇪🇬 @goldprices100 · 60,203 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
The Elite🇪🇬توقعات سعر الذهب @theEliteEG · 39,158 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
اسعار الذهب لحظه بلحظه @GoldToday0 · 97,241 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
اخبار الفوركس والاقتصاد📊 @fx_news_34 · 72,013 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
BTC - مركز تجارة الذهب الخام @bulliontradingcentet · 19,364 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
أسعار الذهب لحظه بلحظه 🇪🇬 @goldprices10 · 509,135 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
الذهب والعملات - اقتصادى @Goldfekr · 165,921 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة Gold Era لتجارة الذهب @GoldEraTrading · 42,823 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
exness.arabic @exnessAR · 19,773 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
أسعار الفضة الأن بمصر 🇪🇬 @silver_as3ar · 34,221 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
قناه لتحليل الذهب @fady66 · 19,050 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أخبار الذهب والدولار” (@USDGoldusd), 20,013 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USDGoldusd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.