النفط اتوقع له شلال هبوط تقنيا لكن الاخبار الجيوسياسيه ممكن تعفسنا نأمن ونستمر 🙏🏻
❤17

Channel
@bu3oof_fx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,474subscribers
-5,110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101670934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bu3oof_fx |
| Description | توصيات على الذهب وازواج العملات والنفط والمؤشرات نتائجنا تتكلم عنا Signal for gold and oil and forex our result in front of all 🇶🇦🇶🇦 10 years trader Abdulrahamn https://linktr.ee/bu3ouf_fx التواصل مع الدعم فقط @qatar1992 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bu3oof_fx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 37,474 | -378 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 37,852 | -200 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:25 | 38,052 | -221 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 38,273 | -123 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:34 | 38,396 | -109 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 38,505 | -156 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 38,661 | -152 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 38,813 | -205 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 39,018 | -145 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 39,163 | -178 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 39,341 | -253 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 39,594 | -392 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 39,986 | -231 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 40,217 | -211 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 40,428 | -104 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 40,532 | -158 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 40,690 | -215 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 40,905 | -255 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 41,160 | -354 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 41,514 | first reading |
299 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 299 (7 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 455,879 |
| Reactions total | 106,820 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109,971 reactions across 299 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15,782 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 12,331 | 11.2% | |
| 👍 | 12,033 | 10.9% | |
| 🥰 | 11,829 | 10.8% | |
| 🎉 | 11,784 | 10.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11,245 | 10.2% | |
| 😍 | 11,242 | 10.2% | |
| 💯 | 11,191 | 10.2% | |
| 🤩 | 11,148 | 10.1% | |
| 👏 | 504 | 0.458% | |
| 😁 | 486 | 0.442% | |
| 😭 | 146 | 0.133% | |
| 🫡 | 87 | 0.079% | |
| 💔 | 60 | 0.055% | |
| 🙏 | 30 | 0.027% | |
| 🕊 | 22 | 0.02% | |
| 🌚 | 20 | 0.018% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 0.016% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 0.007% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.005% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 299 of the 299 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109,971 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 299 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bu3oof_fx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 299 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
النفط اتوقع له شلال هبوط تقنيا لكن الاخبار الجيوسياسيه ممكن تعفسنا نأمن ونستمر 🙏🏻
❤17
تفعل تعزيزها فالنا التوفيق🚀
❤8😍1
تم الهدف الاول طبعا 50+🔥🔥🔥 زيرو انعكاس طبعا🔥🔥🔥
🫡6
انا في الطيارة ما الحق اكتب التوصية كاملة Sell usoil now Sl 1$ Sell usoil now 92.12 92.62 Sl 93.12 Tp1 91.62 Tp2 91.12 Tp3 90.63 Tp4 89.12 Tp5 87.12
❤66👍45🔥40😁38👏34🎉29🥰23🕊5
Sell gbpjpy 208.085 208.585 Sl 209.085 TP1 207.885 TP2 207.485 TP3 207.085 Tp4 205.085 Tp5 203.085
❤60🎉56🥰48👏41👍40🔥38😁36🕊3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤53👍53🔥52😁50🎉49👏36🥰31💯1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤79🔥64🎉62🥰61😁57👍56👏40🕊3
Sl hit -100 بنراقبه اول ماياكد اتجاه بنصفعه👍
❤77👍68🥰62🔥57🎉53😁51👏47🫡4
بدون تعزيز ونثبت الستوب مع اني اشوفه هابط الى الان واخره مناطق 4450 لكن بلتزم بستوبي انا والله يوفقنا وياكم خير
❤81👏66🥰64👍54🔥52😁48🎉45💔4
Sell gold now 4430 Sl 4442 Tp1 4425 Tp2 4415 Tp3 4401 Tp4 4350 Tp5 4200
❤82👍70👏56🎉54😁53🥰47😭7🌚2
🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝 Buy btcusd now 78950 77950 Sl 76950 Tp1 79500 Tp2 80500 Tp3 81500 Tp4 84000 Tp5 86000
👍49🔥47🎉46❤44🥰43😍35😁31❤🔥19
لسه عندي كثير يدهشكو🚀🚀🚀 استفدت من القناة انشرها عند ربعك هالاسبوع كل التوصيات مجانية🚀🚀🚀
❤64🔥52🥰52🎉50👍49🤩30❤🔥23😁23
Showing the 12 most recent of 299 posts we hold for @bu3oof_fx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بوعوفfx 🇶🇦” (@bu3oof_fx), 37,474 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bu3oof_fx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.