Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 72 days, net +8,161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,542–31,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 05:56
29,611
-18
16 Oct 2026, 07:04
29,629
-105
15 Oct 2026, 06:00
29,734
-36
14 Oct 2026, 05:37
29,770
-24
12 Oct 2026, 02:42
29,794
-104
7 Oct 2026, 08:57
29,898
-96
2 Oct 2026, 14:15
29,994
+5,866
18 Sept 2026, 14:00
24,128
+4,962
16 Sept 2026, 07:37
19,166
-155
14 Sept 2026, 13:18
19,321
-105
13 Sept 2026, 00:36
19,426
-257
11 Sept 2026, 00:38
19,683
-96
8 Sept 2026, 01:37
19,779
-115
5 Sept 2026, 00:55
19,894
-36
3 Sept 2026, 10:13
19,930
-92
2 Sept 2026, 05:53
20,022
-38
1 Sept 2026, 04:38
20,060
-26
31 Aug 2026, 04:44
20,086
-15
30 Aug 2026, 02:43
20,101
-100
29 Aug 2026, 02:11
20,201
first reading
Engagement
534 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 29,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
293 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
293
of 534 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 281 of 293 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
534 (5 August 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
347,491
Reactions total
12,058
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 21:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,800
Videos
≈399
Links
≈5,260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13m 56s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,263 reactions across 488 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,823
19.9%
👍
4,082
16.8%
💯
3,821
15.7%
🔥
3,820
15.7%
🥰
3,792
15.6%
😍
3,754
15.5%
👎
91
0.375%
🙏
53
0.218%
👏
24
0.099%
💋
3
0.012%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 496 of the 534 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 534 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥇من يتحكم بأسعار الذهب 📣🔴… عندما تتحول الأخبار الاقتصادية إلى فخ!
📊 بيانات تضخم ووظائف تحرك الأسواق بعنف… لكن هل تعكس الأسعار الواقع الاقتصادي فعلاً؟
🎯 اختراقات كاذبة، انعكاسات مفاجئة، وأموال المتداولين بين المطرقة والسندان!
⚠️ هل تتحكم المؤسسات الكبرى بحركة الذهب؟ أم أن الأخبار مجرد طُعم لاصطياد المتداولين؟
🔥 بعد 15 عاماً في الأسواق… تعلمت أن السوق لا يرحم، وأن اللعبة أكبر مما تتخيل!
انستغرام
…
الذهب… عندما يفشل التحليل الفني والاقتصادي! ☄️☄️☄️
🖥 بيانات اقتصادية واضحة، وتحليلات فنية منطقية… لكن السوق يتحرك بعكس كل التوقعات! 📈📉
⚠️التضخم يرتفع، عوائد السندات تنهار، والذهب يتحدى جميع التفسيرات! ⁉️
هل أصبحت الأخبار الاقتصادية فخاً للمتداولين؟ ومن يدفع ثمن هذه التناقضات؟ ⛔️
15 عاماً في الأسواق علمتني أن صحة التحليل لا تعني بالضرورة نجاح الصفقة! ▶️
انتسغرام 🌐
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DekDV…
Showing the 12 most recent of 534 posts we hold for @MahmoudEdelbi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Prep 1 | Science | Mr.Ahmed ElBasha @Elbashasci · 24,727 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Memphis Tours @memphis_tours · 30,153 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026
HennawiFX تحليل الذهب والعملات @HennawiFx · 19,751 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
OLXFOREX @OLXFOREXCHANNEL · 19,038 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
🎯♦️ نجم الفوركس ♦️🎯 @nfxx77 · 202,114 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
💧SEA💧 FOREX / FREE 🔥💰 @SEAFOREX · 42,570 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
قناه لتحليل الذهب @fady66 · 18,973 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 October 2026
المصرى افندى دهب forex🔔 @hstHn52 · 24,469 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
CFI Group Arabic @cfijgroup · 38,821 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
الإنجليزية مع حنان 2 @English_with_Hanan2 · 49,655 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
🇰🇼 Free CaptainQ8 Signal ( القبطان) 🇰🇼 @Captain_kw · 40,326 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
تداول الداو والذهب بأمان🎯 @tradingdowgold · 19,588 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
قناة Gold Era لتجارة الذهب @GoldEraTrading · 43,024 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
︻╦╤─ الہصيہاد 📊 @El_SayaadEX · 57,054 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
NAEEM | TRADER 🇪🇬 @naeemktrader · 113,215 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
بوعوفfx 🇶🇦 @bu3oof_fx · 33,263 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
كليزر سوريا ✨ 𝙔𝘼𝙕𝘼𝙉 ✨ @yazansyria2000 · 82,291 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
نشرة اخبار الفوركس 📰 @ForexNewspaper · 127,089 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
exness.arabic @exnessAR · 19,947 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أسواق الذهب و المال مع محمود إدلبي” (@MahmoudEdelbi), 29,611 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MahmoudEdelbi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.