لا تصدقوا أننا سنفقد استقلاليتنا، ولا تصدقوا أننا قد فقدناها
❤6🔥3

Channel
@ahmedazzamfx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,687subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001049167778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ahmedazzamfx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2016 and 31 December 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ahmedazzamfx |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 1,687 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 1,683 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 1,687 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 1,687 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 1,689 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,690 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1,691 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,693 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 1,692 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 1,694 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 1,691 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,689 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 1,693 | -1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 1,694 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 63.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لا تصدقوا أننا سنفقد استقلاليتنا، ولا تصدقوا أننا قد فقدناها
❤6🔥3
لا قرار متوقع للاجتماعات القادمة،،،، القرار سيتخذ اجتماع باجتماع
❤2👍1🔥1
ولا تعليق على أداء الدولار، لأنه مهمة وزارة الخزانة
❤1👍1
جيروم باول يمتنع عن الرد على أي تعليق من ترامب وجماعته 😂
❤1🤯1
لا أرد على تعليقات المسؤولين الآخرين. 🥸 ربما تكون قضية ليزا كوك أهم قضية في تاريخ الاحتياطي الفيدرالي. من المعروف أن بول فولكر لجأ إلى المحكمة العليا في قضية شهيرة.
❤1👍1
الأسواق تسعر الآن أن خفض الفائدة ممكن أن يكون في يونيو أو يوليو ال25 نقطة أساس في يوليو ممكنة
❤3
التغييرات في بيان الفيدرالي: النشاط الاقتصادي "قوي" بعد أن كان "معتدلاً"؛ مكاسب الوظائف "ظلت منخفضة"، ومعدل البطالة "أظهر بعض علامات الاستقرار"؛ المفاجأة الأكبر هي حذف عبارة "تحول في ميزان المخاطر".
والر خليفة جيروم باول؟ 😂
😁4👍1
تثبيت الفائدة من الفيدرالي التصويت 10-2 ميران + والر = معارضين للتثبيت
https://youtu.be/6ojvjNaB-AI?si=YG29WSDetHYktKiu
بنوك مركزية تواصل مراكمة الذهب بقوة في نهاية 2025 - البنوك المركزية اشترت نحو 45 طنًا من الذهب في نوفمبر، ثاني أقوى شهر شراء في 2025، وثاني مرة هذا العام تتجاوز المشتريات 40 طنًا. - إجمالي مشتريات البنوك المركزية خلال أول 11 شهرًا من 2025 وصل إلى 297 طنًّا من الذهب، ما يؤكد بقاء الطلب الرسمي قويًّا ومتواصلًا. - البنك الوطني البولندي تصدّر الشراء للشهر الثاني على التوالي، مضيفًا +12 طنًا ليرتفع رصيده إلى 543 طنًا (نح…
باول يواجه ترامب،،، وآخيرًا !!!!! - لأول مرة منذ عام، جيروم باول يخرج عن صمته ويرد على انتقادات الرئيس ترامب، مؤكدًا أن «هذا التهديد هو نتيجة عدم اتباع تفضيلات الرئيس». - تصريحات باول تأتي وسط تحقيق جنائي جديد من المدعين الفدراليين، وبعد أشهر كان يكتفي فيها بالقول إنه لا يملك أي تعليق على هجمات ترامب المتكررة. - عقود مؤشرات الأسهم الأميركية تراجعت بأكثر من 0.5% مباشرة بعد التصريحات، في إشارة إلى قلق الأسواق من تسي…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ahmedazzamfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوركس - أحمد عزام” (@ahmedazzamfx), 1,687 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmedazzamfx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.