📊 أداء عملة الإيثيريوم خلال شهر كامل عدد الصفقات: 57 صفقة الصفقات الناجحة: 45 صفقة ✅ الصفقات غير الناجحة: 12 صفقة فقط! الرافعة: 100 مبلغ الدخول: 500$ لكل صفقة 🔥 صافي الربح: 1,399% = 6,997$ هل من منافس!!!!

Channel
SND
@SNDP2P
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,774subscribers
-682 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001910019313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SNDP2P |
| Description | نقدم حلول برمجية وأدوات تساعدك في التداول في أسواق المال -> مؤشرات - بوتات - تعليم < - للإشتراك أو الاستفسار @SND_P13 https://www.majal.link/p/wkHM97C9 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 30 November 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SNDP2P |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 32,774 | -47 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:43 | 32,821 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 32,851 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:26 | 32,864 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 32,891 | -19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 32,910 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 32,921 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 32,952 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 32,969 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 32,987 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 33,012 | -40 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 33,052 | -35 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 33,087 | -40 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 33,127 | -28 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 33,155 | -27 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 33,182 | -24 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 33,206 | -36 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 33,242 | -42 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 33,284 | -27 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 33,311 | first reading |
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.22%
- avg views ÷ 32,774 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 398
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 57
- of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (1 July 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 18,726 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 650
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 49
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10m 32s
- Average length
- 5m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 56 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SNDP2P. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
SND pinned a photo
تبقى يومين لإنتهاء الخصم ⏳ سارع بالاشتراك ، العرض لن يتكرر 🥰
أحد تنبيهات البوت للأيام الماضية 😎 عملة #BANDUSDT نسبة الربح : 31% 🔥
📊 أداء البيتكوين خلال شهر كامل عدد الصفقات: 81 صفقة الصفقات الناجحة: 68 صفقة ✅ الصفقات غير الناجحة: 13 صفقة فقط! لو أخذنا الهدف الثاني فقط، على رافعة 75 وبمبلغ 500$ لكل صفقة: 🔥 صافي الربح: 968% = 4,842$
SND pinned a photo
تبقى 3 أيام لإنتهاء الخصم ⏳ سارع بالاشتراك ، العرض لن يتكرر 🥰
أحد تنبيهات البوت للأيام الماضية 😎 عملة #GMXUSDT نسبة الربح : 20% 🔥
📊 حسبة بسيطة على عملة #PROMUSDT هذي الحسبة تبين لكم دقة مؤشرنا. حسبتنا على رافعة 75، وبمبلغ 500$ لكل صفقة. عند الإشارة رقم 1، نلاحظ أن الهدف الثالث حقق نسبة 12,230%. عند الإشارة رقم 2، نلاحظ أن وقف الخسارة حقق 5,019%. عند الإشارة رقم 3، نلاحظ أن صافي الربح هو: 7,211% = 36,056$ خلنا نقول يا عزيزي إنك ما أخذت الهدف الثالث، بل اكتفيت بالهدف الثاني: صافي الربح يصبح 5,877% = 29,385$ وخلنا نقول إنك تحب القليل وتطلع …
SND pinned a photo
تبقى 4 أيام لإنتهاء الخصم ⏳ سارع بالاشتراك ، العرض لن يتكرر 🥰
أحد تنبيهات البوت للأيام الماضية 😎 عملة #CAKEUSDT نسبة الربح : 20% 🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @SNDP2P. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@corses0 · 76,265#1
@ForexBreakingNews · 366,606#2
@corses9 · 111,779#3
@fisal_alswadi · 36,578#4
@protrading36 · 21,926#5
@leacked_coursesVIP · 45,987#6
@tradingxp1 · 21,982#7
@xr_5_z113 · 9,027#8
@corses33 · 10,069#9
@coursst · 33,777#10
@KO_R17 · 29,845#11
@cryptomena1 · 105,244#12
@T_T_Community_ict · 5,223#13
@Iraq_Traders · 18,633#14
@Learncryptobtc · 4,877#15
@ForexNewspaper · 122,748#16
@wolfcharts · 4,980#17
@crypto_currencyME · 105,192#18
@fooxcrypto · 1,507#19
@Whalee_Trade · 10,527#20
@Abod_Cryptocurrency · 10,977#21
@crypto_News24_Z · 29,458#22
@Tradingcoursat · 22,756#23
@Fundamental_analysisT · 5,014#24
@cr_halal · 107,867#25
@CrypoIslam · 48,382#26
@signals_gold_vip · 3,881#27
@cryptonews3111 · 10,074#28
@fxcorses · 18,586#29
@scalping_Signalss · 24,713#30
@tradaying · 36,429#31
@course_ict · 12,070#32
@T_T_Community_smc · 5,565#33
@s3toshi · 10,900#34
@karimwaelfx · 10,529#35
@Learn_With_Shaimmaa · 11,658#36
@fx_news_34 · 77,587#37
@sunTMPT · 625#38
@skadel · 7,470#39
@FractalGeometryAcadem · 775 (as read 5 September 2026)#40
@himaih · 15,691#41
@analyzer_omar1 · 10,573#42
@Arabicwhalesnews · 15,660#43
@annexOF · 5,427#44
@future125x2 · 17,202#45
@protradink · 1,314#46
@OfficialZcrypto · 11,353#47
@ArabChainSignals · 540#48
@abramchart · 25,988#49
@shimaaFuture2 · 31,241#50
@ayohani2022 · 1,697#51
@GHOSTANALYSIS · 4,276#52
@scalping_Midd · 18,823#53
@abusalamachart · 11,236#54
@forex_silver_team · 4,362#55
@Betatrading_fx · 1,159#56
@CRYPTO_TO_HOLD · 15,868#57
@DamenP2P · 14,200#58
@hasansaadelmasrifx · 9,706#59
@corses3 · 85,465#60
@EATrading1 · 251,227#61
@tradinglibrary12 · 19,594#62
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,856#63
@tradingsafewithtrust · 5,421#64
@T_T_Community_smc2 · 2,342#65
@shimaa_Feactal_Vip · 17,256#66
@AshrafAlkurdi · 1,719#67
@KINGFTL_27_MARKETING · 26,053#68
@Adamkamal144 · 46,363#69
@T_T_Community_ict2 · 2,228#70
@ictengl · 2,570 (as read 5 September 2026)#71
@QFMTA · 20,553#72
@SQ9FX · 4,873#73
@YD_Cryptocurrency · 13,646#74
@ICT_smc12 · 2,170#75
@Sir_ICT · 753#76
@ArabChainChannel · 10,098#77
@academylions · 3,868 (as read 5 September 2026)#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@corses0 · 76,265
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@u222c · 86,427
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
@TradingGeniuses · 43,853
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
@oBarmej · 233,960
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
@EslammohamedHR · 64,006
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
@englishlearn36 · 86,263
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 August 2026
@corses3 · 85,465
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SND” (@SNDP2P), 32,774 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SNDP2P.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.