Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spark Academia

Channel

Spark Academia

@SPARK_ACADEMIA

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,423subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349254354
TypeChannel
Username@SPARK_ACADEMIA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SPARK_ACADEMIA

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5762 · this entry27 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC@karmaamar/467528 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC1.0023 hours
@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5767 · this entry30 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC@karmaamar/467930 Jun 2026, 09:51 UTC1.002.9 hours
@karmaamar/467226 Jun 2026, 08:42 UTC@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5770 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC1.006 days
@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5772 · this entry2 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC@karmaamar/46854 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.0042 hours
@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5775 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC@karmaamar/46919 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC1.005 days
@SPARK_ACADEMIA/5795 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC@karmaamar/470520 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC1.004 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@karmaamar9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0021 hoursthis entry (81)
@psyedu29 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0021 hoursthis entry (81)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @SPARK_ACADEMIA — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,4233,4353,4296 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,433 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,431 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,432 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,429 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,425 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,430 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,428 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,427 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,425 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,431 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,423 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,421–3,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:413,423-8
13 Sept 2026, 22:013,431+6
9 Sept 2026, 23:163,425-2
5 Sept 2026, 01:393,427-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:123,428-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:043,430+5
23 Aug 2026, 03:583,425-4
19 Aug 2026, 13:063,429-3
16 Aug 2026, 05:053,432+1
9 Aug 2026, 09:523,431-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:113,433-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:373,435no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:323,435first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3652.2%
1420.3%
👌913.0%
👏57.25%
😍34.35%
👎22.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ravanshenasi_t

🔻 منابع دکتری روان‌شناسی و مشاوره از زبان رتبه ١ و ٢ https://t.me/+T8TWz0L5DmxkmuBc آموزشهای دوران نامزدی و عقد+ فایلهای آموزشی @namzadioaghd دانلود رایگان ویس فیلم وکتاب روانشناسی @psycology_OM "خط به خط کتاب کاپلان" @KAPLAN_SADOCKS بانک مقالات &پایان نامه&پروپوزال روانشناسی @Maghalate_motabar1 نیازمندیها و استخدام روانشناس ومشاور @pajuheshyar دانلود pdf های جذاب وکمیاب روانشناسی @psymedia استخدااام فوری روان

Signed رضا شیرمحمدی

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC55 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScuyM-ntfbzAqX5c0oYxTyvRzawFv1WDctHPuSPP-Yqbt3BcQ/viewform?usp=header سلام و عرض ادب خدمت دوستان عزیزانی که تا به حال از هوش مصنوعی استفاده کردند بسیار لطف بزرگی میکنند اگه ده دقیقه زمان ارزشمندشون رو صرف تکمیل این پرسشنامه بکنند برای تکمیل کارم خیلی به کمکتون نیاز دارم و ممنون میشم اگر مقدور هست کمک کنید حدود ۲۰۰ نفر نیاز دارم 😢

4 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

قبول دارید؟😂 اون لحظه تایید استاد انگار دنیا رو به آدم دادن🥳🥹 🆔 @SPARK_ACADEMIA

😍3

2 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC172 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎯 وقتشه پایان‌نامه و مقاله‌تو جدی بگیری! 🌀 گیر کردی وسط پایان‌نامه؟ 📝 چند وقته می‌خوای مقاله بنویسی ولی نمی‌دونی از کجا شروع کنی؟ یا شاید… اصلاً نمی‌دونی قراره چه کاری انجام بدی! 💡 خبر خوب: با منتورینگ تخصصی پایان‌نامه و مقاله توی مسیر پژوهشی تنها نیستی! ✳️ چی به دست میاری؟ ✅ انتخاب موضوع مناسب (بر اساس علاقه و رزومه‌سازی) ✅ طراحی پروپوزال یا ساختار مقاله علمی ✅ راهنمایی گام‌به‌گام برای نگارش، تحلیل و ادیت ✅ آما

4

1 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC166 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅ استراتژی صحیح برای پیگیری مقالات سابمیت شده چند وقت پیش پیامی از یکی از همراهان عزیز کانال گرفتم که واقعاً جای فکر می‌کرد. می‌گفت: «من نزدیک ۱۰ ماهه مقاله‌ام رو سابمیت کردم...نه دسک ریجکت شدم، نه خبری از نتیجه هست و نه حتی ایمیلی اومده که مقاله رفته برای داوری یا نه! واقعاً تو این شرایط باید چیکار کنم؟» ببینید دوستان، این یکی از بزرگترین تله‌های دنیای مقاله‌نویسیه. یه نکته خیلی حیاتی هست که باید بهش دقت کنید: هر

👍31

1 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC189 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⁉️ تا حالا پیش اومده ماه‌ها منتظر جواب ژورنال بمونید و بعدش بفهمید تمام این مدت فقط وقتتون تلف شده؟ اگه می‌خواید جواب این سؤال و راهکارش رو بدونید، پستی که امروز توی کانال می‌ذاریم رو دنبال کنید. 🔥 🆔 @SPARK_ACADEMIA

👍4👏1

31 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC206 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

​​مسیر شما چطور بوده؟!😉 🆔 @SPARK_ACADEMIA

👍4👌1

27 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC335 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نقشه‌راهی که ژورنال‌های معتبر عاشقش هستند! 🗺️ سردرگمی در شروع مسیر؟ 🧐 تازه می‌خوای شروع کنی به نوشتن اولین مقاله‌ات؟ نمی‌دونی دقیقاً چه بخش‌هایی رو باید توی متنت بیاری؟ یا اصلاً می‌ترسی چیزی رو از قلم انداخته باشی و داور مقاله رو ریجکت کنه؟ حس سردرگمی بین اجزای مقاله (از چکیده تا نتیجه‌گیری) کاملاً طبیعیه، اما یه راه میان‌بر استاندارد وجود داره! معرفی غولِ گایدلاین‌ها: Equator Network 🌐 این سایت فقط یک دیتابیس س

5

20 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC443 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چرا هوش مصنوعی ممکنه باعث بشه نوشته‌هات «لو» بره؟ 🤖 تا حالا شده با کلی انرژی یه متن بنویسی یا از هوش مصنوعی بخوای یه چیزی برات آماده کنه، اما وقتی برمی‌گردی و دوباره می‌خونی، یه حس عجیبی بهت دست بده؟ انگار متن خیلی «تمیز»، خیلی «مرتب» و در عین حال... خیلی بی‌روحه؟ ببین، مشکل اینجاست که هوش مصنوعی یه سری «عادت‌های بد» داره که باعث میشه ابزارهای تشخیص (AI Detectors) خیلی راحت مچشو بگیرن. انگار یه سری ردپای دیجیتالی ا

👍2👌1

16 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC441 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

حال و هوای این روزاتون چطوره؟!

  1. 😰28%
  2. 😭40%
  3. 😐16%
  4. 🙂19%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC526 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 استاد راهنما گم شده؟ لطفاً تماس نگیرید! فصل اول پایان‌نامه رو با کلی شور و شوق نوشتی. ایمیل رو فرستادی، منتظر موندی... یه روز گذشت، دو روز... یه هفته... کم‌کم داری به این نتیجه می‌رسی که استاد محترم یا توی ماموریت مریخیه یا داره با کبوتر نامه‌بر برات کامنت می‌فرسته! 🕊 دیگه کار از «seen» گذشته. حالت اون کسی رو داری که توی یه رابطه‌ی یک‌طرفه‌ست: تو می‌فرستی، اون ناپدید می‌شه. تو وقت می‌ذاری، اون گویا رفته توی فاز «

👍2👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @SPARK_ACADEMIA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

حال و هوای این روزاتون چطوره؟!

  1. 😰28%
  2. 😭40%
  3. 😐16%
  4. 🙂19%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

مقاله و پایان نامه نویسی جامع کارما
@psyedu2 · 4,905
34 posts
آمار، روش تحقیق و مقاله نویسی کارما
@karmaamar · 6,108
33 posts
فیلم وکلیپ های روانشناسی
@baravanshenasan · 13,559
9 posts
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی
@psyshortmovies · 34,438
7 posts
روانشناسی رشد و شخصیت
@ravanshenasan1 · 13,842
5 posts
روانشناسى بالينى كودك و نوجوان
@childpsychology_official · 10,369
4 posts
زبان روانشناسی ارشد / دکتری
@drheshmati · 10,456
4 posts
فیلم های آموزشی هنر اندیشه
@honareandishe · 13,858
4 posts
آکادمی کنکور کارما
@karmind2021 · 3,874
4 posts
نیازمندی ها و استخدام روان شناسی (روان آگه)
@pajuheshyar · 15,654
4 posts
پکیج ها و کارگاه های روان شناسی
@psy_package · 12,344
4 posts
Ravanfile
@ravanfile · 15,437
4 posts
بنیاد روانشناسی کودک و نوجوان
@childpsychology_ravannews · 11,041
3 posts
نوروسایکولوژی، فیزیولوژیک انگیزش و هیجان
@karmapsychology · 8,420
3 posts
بانک تست کارما
@karmaquiz · 3,059
3 posts
" نظریه‌های شخصیت "
@Oidipous · 8,651
3 posts
انتخاب عنوان تا چاپ پایان نامه و مقاله
@pajuhanee · 7,980
3 posts
آموزش جامع زبان روانشناسی (کارما)
@psycho100 · 4,291
3 posts
کانال تخصصی روانشناسی دکتر احمدترابی
@ahmadtorabie · 4,802
2 posts
مجله روان‌شناسی
@arvinidea · 5,171
2 posts
کنکور روانشناسی بالینی
@konkoreravanshenasi · 21,025
2 posts
پژوهش یار
@SnappResearchTools · 9,740
2 posts
آکـــادمی رواندرمـــانی
@psychotherapy1 · 5,461
1 post
روانشناسی رابطه
@yek_asheghanearam · 7,096
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

آسیب شناسی روانی
@abpsy · 16,204
2 posts
کانال تخصصی روانشناسی دکتر احمدترابی
@ahmadtorabie · 4,802
2 posts
مجله روان‌شناسی
@arvinidea · 5,171
2 posts
مشاوره خانواده
@avayelife · 9,475
2 posts
کلینیک تخصصی روانشناسی بینش نوین
@binesh_novin · 3,573
2 posts
اطلاع رسانی
@cargahsa · 2,660
2 posts
روانشناسی کودک
@childedu · 12,888
2 posts
سینمای روانشناسی
@cinepsy · 9,052
2 posts
کلیپ های روانشناسی
@Clip_ravan · 1,223
2 posts
Ego.science
@ego_science · 4,520
2 posts
فیلم‌کوتاه روان‌شناسی
@filmpsy · 9,345
2 posts
روانشناس خود باش
@Future_psychologist · 4,001
2 posts
هیلگارد
@hilgardpsy · 7,359
2 posts
کانال آموزشی ایستگاه مشاوره
@istgahemoshavere · 4,094
2 posts
کاپلان
@kaplanpsy · 6,938
2 posts
کارگاههای روان شناسی سراسر کشور
@kargahravaniran · 4,261
2 posts
نوروسایکولوژی، فیزیولوژیک انگیزش و هیجان
@karmapsychology · 8,420
2 posts
Metalife
@meetaalife · 2,322
2 posts
" نظریه‌های شخصیت "
@Oidipous · 8,651
2 posts
معصومه کفیلی(خدمات روان شناسی و پژوهشی هنر اندیشه)
@pajuhane · 1,295
2 posts
کارگاه‌های روانشناسی
@psy_work · 10,698
2 posts
کارگاههای آسیب شناسی dsm5
@psychologyservice · 21,783
2 posts
آکـــادمی رواندرمـــانی
@psychotherapy1 · 5,461
2 posts
سایکو مدیا
@psymedia · 14,828
2 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پروپوزال _ پایان نامه _ مقاله
@Proposal · 24,172
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
صفر تا صد | ارشد روانشناسی
@sefrtasad_arshad · 25,638
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spark Academia” (@SPARK_ACADEMIA), 3,423 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SPARK_ACADEMIA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.