📈 قنوات رائجة 🔥

Channel
خلفيات💛عبارات💛حب💛كلام
@STORYAT_10
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
339,489subscribers
-7,699 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001164759533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @STORYAT_10 |
| Description | •قناة بدون حقوق الرسميه🌀🔜🍦. •ما ورىّ نبض ﺎلخفوق إلا غلاك♡ . لـ تمويل : t.me/dlIIIl لـ تواصل : t.me/dddlb •القناه الوحيده والرسميه بالتليجرام📻'• حسابنا على سناب تعالو يا رفاق 🎲♥️ https://www.snapchat.com/add/h6tuu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/STORYAT_10 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 339,489 | -604 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 340,093 | -376 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:27 | 340,469 | -302 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 340,771 | -308 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 341,079 | -221 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 341,300 | -211 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 341,511 | -268 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 341,779 | -261 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 342,040 | -190 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 342,230 | -303 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 342,533 | -269 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 342,802 | -425 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 343,227 | -390 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 343,617 | -252 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 343,869 | -234 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 344,103 | -248 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 344,351 | -249 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 344,600 | -378 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 344,978 | -295 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 345,273 | first reading |
Engagement
200 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.223%
- avg views ÷ 339,489 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 758
- 155 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.149%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 155
- of 200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (23 July 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 117,456 |
| Reactions total | 102 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 02:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,630
- Videos
- ≈343
- Links
- ≈934
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 07s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
171 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 77.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 8.19% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 7.02% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 4.09% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.585% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 200 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @STORYAT_10. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 200 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
زخـرفةه اسمـك 💙
عندك واتساب ✅
صمم اسمك بنفسك 💁♀💜
📈 قنوات رائجة 🔥
تعالوا نكون اصحاب في السناب 👻🫀💕. https://www.snapchat.com/add/h6tuu
🥶هل تصلي ♥️ ؟ ◯ اي ◯ لا
❤1
زخرف اسمك.
ايش اللي يغلبكم أكثر 🤩
- قلبي70%
- عقلي30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📈 قنوات رائجة 🔥
- لا تزال أنت كل رغباتي، الفكرة الأخيرة قبل النوم ، والفكرة قراءة المزيد 🩷
• صمم حرفك وحرف الحب 🤤💕🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @STORYAT_10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ايش اللي يغلبكم أكثر 🤩
- قلبي70%
- عقلي30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ايش اللي يغلبكم أكثر 🤩
- قلبي70%
- عقلي30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ايش اللي يغلبكم أكثر 🤩
- قلبي71%
- عقلي29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Mona_photography · 752 postsالملك فون للجوالات
@a05428500 · 141 postعبارات ، عيد ، ميلاد ، صديقتي💓💓
@Elllikx · 95,6321 postاقتباسات حب 🤎
@fatnr · 12,9181 postنظرة
@G9_Ok · 2,5821 postمقاطع فيديوهات حالات واتساب
@hany123 · 9,6831 postاقتباسات حب ستوريات صور بنات خلفيات
@Raakan_2 · 188,9411 postاقتباسات ، عبارات ، ادعيه دينيه 🤍،
@STORYAT_100 · 27,3651 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Raakan_2 · 188,941#1
@Elllikx · 95,632#2
@i3zms_1 · 2,043#3
@STORYAT_11 · 544,643#4
@uv_41 · 488,499#5
@Einglish_jj · 229,942#6
@PVVVV · 824,682#7
@llyl7 · 433,035#8
@STORYAT_100 · 27,365#9
@zzuzz · 867,748#10
@admant1 · 410,822#11
@J777E · 269,585#12
@Yosmo · 281,180#13
@SS8SS_8 · 5,798#14
@ASEEEMM · 377,433#15
@iraq11e · 318,421#16
@SS2lS · 188,529#17
@zzizi · 260,421#18
@m8sdtxx · 372,484#19
@dreamAA30 · 356,243#20
@STORS5 · 287,557#21
@nn_48 · 340,221#22
@Video_ra · 365,980#23
@HADILBET · 323,241#24
@zz_zwz · 392,969#25
@zzzxx8 · 337,986#26
@myiyia · 192,489#27
@DDYD7 · 152,112#28
@unfor2 · 249,661#29
@rerrs · 317,399#30
@uv_42 · 204,435#31
@op_35 · 302,982#32
@hhhieee · 394,034#33
@EE_6S · 268,958#34
@alharbiah123 · 15,135#35
@shsvsbbs · 226,194#36
@aghar_offical · 229,043#37
@Copy_MEast · 223,698#38
@sdqgii · 31,306#39
@UIOIU0U · 185,815#40
@N_O_1i · 3,444#41
@fatnr · 12,918#42
@Ak_tebas · 221,398#43
@eee_up · 14,660#44
@huruf2022 · 7,846#45
@Feeling088 · 138,817#46
@nn_41 · 340,036#47
@jolnar11 · 239,382#48
@ccvvv · 322,172#49
@drzahoraaa9 · 350,534#50
@uv_93 · 88,903#51
@gsvsvw · 281,072#52
@bisharalibrary · 134,391#53
@Awra8 · 53,267#54
@NN_X5 · 323,329#55
@uv_vz · 315,119#56
@L_ooov · 154,654#57
@majarrahsky · 96,285#58
@VXXXXP · 16,184#59
@q_p_81 · 251,171#60
@Towarddream8 · 291,573#61
@hany123 · 9,683#62
@q_ggi · 150,668#63
@tasamim_a47 · 5,814#64
@Ft096 · 6,180#65
@HH_H7S · 277,493#66
@TTTTpT · 491,099#67
@yypyy · 902,639#68
@NNNAA · 451,613#69
@zzzxx · 428,118#70
@NA2007_27 · 672#71
@alhdanor · 529#72
@Malath_AlroOoh · 208,186#73
@un_37 · 388,997#74
@shaimaeaziz · 5,153#75
@Un_30 · 234,926#76
@Di8rE · 117,916#77
@assskk5 · 238,390#78
@Pinterestz · 192,735#79
@alym_2 · 96,414#80
@LearnEng01 · 320,516#81
@nasme_t · 214,102#82
@iiiio201 · 205,407#83
@iraqed5 · 296,217#84
@piip511 · 12,593#85
@V0VVV1 · 325,557#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Einglish_jj · 229,942
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@Raakan_2 · 188,941
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@Elllikx · 95,632
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
@SC_7P · 50,625
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
@Awra8 · 53,267
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@Ak_tebas · 221,398
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@STORYAT_11 · 544,643
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@rerrs · 317,399
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@aghar_offical · 229,043
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@ccvvv · 322,172
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@Video_ra · 365,980
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@llyl7 · 433,035
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@uv_41 · 488,499
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@DDYD7 · 152,112
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@enn85 · 303,111
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
@admant1 · 410,822
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@Pinterestz · 192,735
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
@wsafat · 148,915
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@life92 · 166,019
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@Quranyjannatyofficial · 176,086
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@shsvsbbs · 226,194
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@iiiio201 · 205,407
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@majarrahsky · 96,285
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
@uv_42 · 204,435
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خلفيات💛عبارات💛حب💛كلام” (@STORYAT_10), 339,489 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STORYAT_10.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.