29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 18,841β19,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 21:16
18,886
-37
4 Sept 2026, 18:20
18,923
+5
3 Sept 2026, 01:03
18,918
-11
2 Sept 2026, 02:26
18,929
-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:45
18,935
-8
31 Aug 2026, 01:58
18,943
-9
30 Aug 2026, 01:06
18,952
-8
29 Aug 2026, 02:24
18,960
-13
27 Aug 2026, 23:25
18,973
-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:26
18,977
-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:23
18,978
-20
25 Aug 2026, 01:04
18,998
-20
23 Aug 2026, 10:18
19,018
-18
22 Aug 2026, 00:24
19,036
-11
20 Aug 2026, 17:48
19,047
-8
19 Aug 2026, 18:16
19,055
-3
18 Aug 2026, 15:04
19,058
-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:37
19,067
-10
16 Aug 2026, 16:15
19,077
-24
15 Aug 2026, 01:24
19,101
first reading
Engagement
358 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
15.1%
avg views Γ· 18,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,860
279 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
279
of 358 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 274 of 279 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
358 (4 August 2026 β 2 September 2026)
Views total
796,832
Reactions total
25,453
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 49m
Average length
2m 28s
Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
35,119 reactions across 350 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
9,956
28.3%
π―
6,444
18.3%
π
4,560
13.0%
π₯
3,226
9.19%
π
2,973
8.47%
π
1,666
4.74%
π€£
1,367
3.89%
π
1,350
3.84%
β‘
969
2.76%
β€βπ₯
449
1.28%
π
388
1.10%
π’
372
1.06%
π
284
0.809%
π€―
265
0.755%
π€
210
0.598%
π±
201
0.572%
π
88
0.251%
π
83
0.236%
π
68
0.194%
π₯°
64
0.182%
12 further kinds
136
0.387%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 351 of the 358 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 35,119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 358 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 358 we hold a reading for Β· 0.3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @STR1KER17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 358 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ππ₯β‘οΈI see this WHOLE THING as a DIVERSION. You kill 3 CHILDREN?
It's not rocket science.
The REASON makes no difference. 3 LITTLE LIVES WERE BRUTALLY TAKEN.
It's called CUT & DRY.
She needs to go. PERMANENTLY.
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
BREAKING: Lindsay Clancy Jury Sends ANOTHER Note to Judge Saying They Are DEADLOCKED
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/developing-lindsay-clancy-jury-sends-another-note-judge/
08-31-2026 GUTFELD MONOLOGUE RE: DATA CENTERS & A.I.
This aired after PHIL'S RAPID FIRE LIVE...
I missed the 8/31/26 RAPID FIRE live when it aired, because I was at rehearsal. I caught it when I got home: VERY late.
Phil expounded on Data Centers, and how EVERYONE is "against them" w/o REALLY knowing WHAT they are, and WHY they exist.
He stated they have to do w/ TESLA ENERGY.
We also know that TRUMP has stated Dβ¦
And just like that, we're on the other side of it...
Time to fire up the rig back up & and keep workin'.
Glad I'm not driving in it, but there's lateron when the next batch is supposed to be comin' thru between 9-11pm, in which I may be smack dab in the middle of it on the way home tonight.
For now? It's all good in the hood.
It must've sped up a bit because it was supposed to hit between 2 & 3pm...
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
Whelp, it's here and it's angry. The pups are freakin', and I just keep repeating, "It's ok.... It'll be over soon..." and "Settle down".
Man that thunder is outrageous, and it's a super hard rain. It's goin' so fast, I expect it to be like a 10-15min storm, but dang it's packin' a whollop!
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
Here is Butter & Grit's performance for last night's Semi-Finals...
Butter & Grit - "THAT'S OKAY"...
#LISTEN & #PAYATTENTION TO THE LYRICS!!!
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
There is another DUO on AGT this year entitled, "Butter and Grit".
This is the tune they performed during the "Performer Callbacks".
Another artist to watch for in the coming years....
"GOD KNEW"β€οΈ
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
09-01-2026 GUY KELTON JONES I:
This was last night's semi-final performance that seemed as if it was for EVERY ONE OF US...
THEY CAN'T SAY WE DIDN'T TRY!
π«‘
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
There are a few acts this year on America's Got Talent that REALLY have me intrigued.
THIS GUY!! OMG! THIS DUDE "GETS" IT!
#LISTEN AND #PAYATTENTION TO HIS WORDS!
REMEMBER HIS NAME:
GUY KELTON JONES
This was his AUDITION piece.
WE ARE *ALL* FIGHTERS!!
Last night's performance, sounded like it was a DIRECT MESSAGE to ALL of us...
I'm currently trying to hunt it down to screen record and post it next...
πΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈ
π₯π₯TOUCHIE & PROBABLY AN UNPOPULAR POSTπ₯π₯
On 08-31-2026 in Phil's Rapid Fire, the question in re: to Dolly Parton being involved w/ trafficking, and the response was, "NO".
She had hooked up w/ Porter Wagner early on, and MK Ultra was apparently involved.
Kenny Rogers refused to be a part of it, and supposedly helped her escape that whole thing.
I can tell you in my PERSONAL experience w/ "her", there was some serβ¦
fyi @philgodlewski
Cue Broadcast is desperate to get members back .,. Pham don't fall for a free week just opt out!
π44π―25π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 358 posts we hold for @STR1KER17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@STR1KER17 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@consitustionx named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSTR1KERπΊπΈπ€πΊπ€πΊπΈβ (@STR1KER17), 18,886 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STR1KER17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.