Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صــور حــب 💍🩵

Channel

صــور حــب 💍🩵

@S_5_2_0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,225subscribers

-367 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795080842
TypeChannel
Username@S_5_2_0
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/S_5_2_0

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,22511,59211,408.512 August 2026 — 11,592 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,565 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,531 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,497 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,480 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,462 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,449 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,432 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,422 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,412 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,400 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,389 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,379 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,359 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,350 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,325 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,306 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,251 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,225 subscribers12 August 202611 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 29 days, net -367. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,170–11,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 01:4111,225-26
8 Sept 2026, 05:1811,251-55
5 Sept 2026, 01:5711,306-19
3 Sept 2026, 10:0611,325-25
2 Sept 2026, 02:5211,350-9
1 Sept 2026, 06:1411,359-20
31 Aug 2026, 04:4611,379-10
30 Aug 2026, 05:5411,389-11
29 Aug 2026, 08:0311,400-12
28 Aug 2026, 08:2411,412-10
27 Aug 2026, 07:0711,422-10
26 Aug 2026, 05:2411,432-17
25 Aug 2026, 02:1311,449-13
23 Aug 2026, 17:0711,462-18
22 Aug 2026, 01:5811,480-17
20 Aug 2026, 21:4611,497-11
19 Aug 2026, 19:2511,508-12
18 Aug 2026, 20:5311,520-11
17 Aug 2026, 19:4811,531-8
16 Aug 2026, 17:4711,539first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.104%
avg views ÷ 11,225 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.7
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
41
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held60 (18 June 20263 September 2026)
Views total480
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:07 UTC1 viewsread 3 September 2026

يلـي قـادرة تلبـس هيـك كعـب أكيـد .... اضغط للتكملة ✨👩‍🦯

29 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC42 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

- يليق بكِ أن تكوني ضوءًا لا ينطفئ، أن تكوني وردًا لا يموت، يليق بكِ أن تكوني كل الأشياء السعيدة التي لا يمكن أن يَعبرها الحُزن يومًا ما💕🤩

29 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC1 viewsread 29 August 2026

من هالقنوات أخذ منشوراتي الجميلة كلشي مفيد بيهن ،صورهم ومحتواهم بيرفكت🫶🏻🦋 https://t.me/addlist/0TW1-FWLzzw5MGRk ساعة واحذفهن 🩵🥺

28 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC46 viewsread 3 September 2026

أبرعُ في طيّ الليالي الباهِتة أحبّ كوني امرأة.. لقراءة المزيد اضغط هنا✨

28 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC1 viewsread 28 August 2026

الريشـة يلي ع راسـك 🪽 مـن .... اضغـط للتكملـة

27 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC1 viewsread 27 August 2026

لأصدقاء اللّيل ، أصدقاء النّجوم والقمر !??

27 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC12 viewsread 28 August 2026

أبرعُ في طيّ الليالي الباهِتة أحبّ كوني امرأة.. لقراءة المزيد اضغط هنا✨

26 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC2 viewsread 27 August 2026

لأصدقاء اللّيل ، أصدقاء النّجوم والقمر !??

26 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC2 viewsread 26 August 2026

مِن هَالمجلد آخذ كُلّ نبذاتي الشَخصية وصُوري الحِلوة 🥹🎀 https://t.me/addlist/jsfiY6Pi82Q4YTVk تُحفة والله لا تضيعوه 🥹🎀

26 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC64 viewsread 3 September 2026

مِن هَالمجلد آخذ كُلّ نبذاتي الشَخصية وصُوري الحِلوة 🥹🎀 https://t.me/addlist/jsfiY6Pi82Q4YTVk تُحفة والله لا تضيعوه 🥹🎀

26 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC1 viewsread 26 August 2026

لمحبي الكتابات العميقـه اذا كنت تبحث عن قناة مليئة بالإقتباسات السطر الواحد والصور الجميلة التي تلامس الروح.. انضم/ي لهاي قنوات 👇🦋🤍 https://t.me/addlist/jsfiY6Pi82Q4YTVk 🤍🦋

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @S_5_2_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حب // Love
@Fatean94 · 29,174
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
شَغف♫
@Hillli86 · 57,056
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
لحبيبتي🤎💍
@yaziahh · 49,522
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Amabelle _ أمابيل ❤️
@Amabelle_0 · 32,379
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
بالعربي
@bl3rbe · 84,012
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
- لـ قـمراية .
@Y8B78 · 28,915
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
حب | Love ♡ .
@L_ooov · 154,509
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
اسـتـراحـةة مـحـارب ❤️‍🩹 !
@evrue · 69,455
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صــور حــب 💍🩵” (@S_5_2_0), 11,225 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_5_2_0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.