فيديوهات 30S رومنسية ❤️❤️🫂

Channel
نَرجِس ♡.
@narjs_093
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,647subscribers
+312 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001912549922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @narjs_093 |
| Description | •• هُنا حيث انا كمّا انا كما اُحبّ أن أكون في عالمي المُفعم بالأمل والحُب ♡. للتواصل : @ayatho200BOT |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/narjs_093 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 37,647 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 37,637 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 37,630 | +20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 37,610 | +11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 37,599 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 37,615 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 37,602 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 37,604 | +40 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 37,564 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 37,544 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 37,540 | +20 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 37,520 | +23 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 37,497 | +36 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 37,461 | +18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 37,443 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 37,440 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 37,448 | +46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 37,402 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 37,388 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 37,385 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.69%
- avg views ÷ 37,647 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 637
- 85 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 85
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (30 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 54,149 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 06:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 95
- Videos
- 52
- Links
- 10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
متى يندم الرجل على انفصاله عن حبيبته ؟! عندما يكتشف أن ..لقراءة المزيد اضغط هنا 📒
- هل الحب حلال او حرام ؟؟ .
متى يندم الرجل على انفصاله عن حبيبته ؟! عندما يكتشف أن ..لقراءة المزيد اضغط هنا 📒
𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟲 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟳 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟴 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟵 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟬 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟮 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟯 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟰 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟱 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟲
- هل الحب حلال او حرام ؟؟ .
فوتوا حطو قلب🤍
https://t.me/My_730 قناتي التانية انضموا
لعلّي بعد سنينَ ليست بالبعيدة أجدُ لي مكاناً يشبهني مهنةً أؤديها بحبٍّ مليئة بالشغف أدعو الله أن يقرّبني إليه ويجعل لي مسكناً يأويني أينما حللت أبقى صاحبة رضا من والديّ كيفما ذهبت ويبقى الودّ بيني وبين أصدقائي كما هو.. صافياً لا يشوبه بُعد أكون مع رجلٍ يُحبني كما أنا يسعدني ويأنسني ويرضيني.. حتى أرضى فأجد بعد كل هذا ذاك السلام بداخلي مهما حلّ الحزن ضيفاً على قلبي و أغلقت الدنيا أبوابها من كل جانب أجد سعادتي فأصنعها …
𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟲 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟳 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟴 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟵 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟬 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟮 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟯 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟰 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟱 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟲
𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟲 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟳 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟴 - 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟵 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟬 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟭 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟮 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟯 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟰 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟱 - 𝟮𝟬𝟬𝟲
لعَلّ الأماني اليائِسة تُزْهِرُ أمَلاً . . ♡.
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @narjs_093. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 50,022 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@heart_beat11 · 14,04215 postsضوء القمر
@amoraamar · 13,10712 postsمَا وَراء السِّتَار . .🍁💜
@wwwsdsdds · 6,0778 postsأنتَ مِلكي💍🩷🫂.
@aybdshjj · 6,2146 postsخليك أيجابي 😅
@poooositive · 9,9895 postsصــور حــب 💍🩵
@S_5_2_0 · 11,3595 postsواقـ❃ٖٖٖٜ፝ــٖــع من المواقـع.๛
@ANKIAKp · 3,4724 postsإكتفاء||🖤🦋
@elyas_xxp · 3,1184 posts- مَقهى الجَميلاتُ 🧚🏻♀️.
@faqyB5X1EKo5MGUO · 8,7504 postsعالم الصور ♥️
@fgijgds · 11,6084 postsحُب ¹².¹² ♥️🌻
@Kaya2052022 · 5,1554 postsمشاعر مبعثرة
@kiemna · 6,6034 postsقهوة الياسمين ☕︎🌸
@Mazaj_coffee · 5,3144 postsM A R Y .
@Memoo_T · 2,6994 postsمملكة ❤مّـُ๛كّْ اٍّلَّلَّيٌّلّ❤️ الحب
@Mesk_ALlail · 7,3404 postsمــــلَآذ 🤍-| - 𝐊𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐁 -
@mhdbdbxhdbdhdbx · 3,4044 postsكـلَام َفـي الـحـبِ ♥️🫂 .
@Ramallpp · 9,7044 postsلـ ٱسَمـرْيَ 🪐♥️.
@Rooh_21 · 2,1814 postsرُوُحْ الرُوُحْ💚🥀
@rooh19890 · 15,6943 posts┋ﺣـالات ۄاتـښ آﭖֆ❥
@StoRy_WhAtSapp2 · 20,0833 posts"مـــشـــاعــــر❤️🔥𝄞⍣⃝
@talelove1 · 4,1052 postsإحسَـاس_Ehsas 🖤
@waten_3 · 17,4292 posts✿ريحانتي MR✿
@Rehamttt · 10,0341 postأقتبـاسـات هـادئــــة 🤍| -𝑳𝑰𝑭𝑬
@rosehip48 · 1,2361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@r_ck_4 · 934#1
@a_l_i_40 · 2,100#2
@quotemeno · 1,513#3
@SRAHAFDFDA · 518#4
@MORAD200824 · 1,560#5
@ANAKs12345 · 1,116#6
@Lev_my1 · 6,200#7
@jejejajajajojo · 3,641#8
@bbrrramma · 564#9
@batosh007 · 1,825#10
@Settamoll · 6,841#11
@sengil9 · 2,791#12
@BMHR2 · 1,637#13
@mmajd642 · 2,952#14
@Patiencee27 · 1,066#15
@kakajalm · 7,004#16
@Abdalhalemhafez · 5,902#17
@Swad27 · 273#18
@LEKALBEE · 5,684#19
@P_h_A_m6 · 1,737#20
@groozaa · 14,610#21
@dhyb_1999 · 8,862#22
@Alwater0 · 10,741#23
@Iyou19 · 1,538#24
@Faarfash · 1,970#25
@Mateesy · 4,060#26
@axop5 · 776 (as read 31 August 2026)#27
@lovee_135 · 668#28
@felings13 · 1,895#29
@Smail_happe · 386#30
@AICGOGJ · 1,612#31
@Mila_m_18 · 2,436#32
@ma_es_30 · 648#33
@TRAMADO0L · 34,990#34
@VI_B_VI · 3,698#35
@LAGROZ · 4,026#36
@r_ck_2 · 3,269#37
@Aphelion8 · 8,580#38
@alternative_music1 · 11,439#39
@A5ngel_1 · 1,075#40
@Ar_eam18 · 1,389#41
@LLOMMMEE · 1,046#42
@Nerolaa · 6,193#43
@Confusion2006 · 452#44
@mayar2000sy · 34#45
@m0aaa1 · 4,790#46
@o_y_ll · 1,241 (as read 31 August 2026)#47
@Hussain2002AA · 7,932#48
@kh3vof · 1,422#49
@right_fact · 504#50
@mmaajjdd_1 · 1,224#51
@danfat7 · 4,403#52
@aktbas579 · 6,258#53
@kw_ri · 1,382#54
@Draft_Eng · 2,770#55
@cetamoll · 831#56
@kharbishat_halabia · 5,921#57
@areensy33 · 4,418#58
@lozckr · 2,722#59
@nasem52 · 563#60
@sosooo212 · 435#61
@farafiiiiiih · 3,403#62
@kghi_303 · 1,500#63
@G_R_E_E_N5 · 512#64
@designs62 · 1,018#65
@adam_no · 3,796#66
@HaidarAd7 · 2,521#67
@m_6_2_8 · 584#68
@A_t9aa · 5,327#69
@syria_121 · 5,110#70
@SBHl1112 · 1,253#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Gafr_a · 47,062
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@plan_etary · 98,895
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نَرجِس ♡.” (@narjs_093), 37,647 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narjs_093.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.