Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صادق المدرسي

Channel

صادق المدرسي

@S_SadiqModarresi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,662subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511234722
TypeChannel
Username@S_SadiqModarresi
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/S_SadiqModarresi

Growth

9,6159,6799,6476 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,620 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,622 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,646 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,669 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,678 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,679 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,665 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,662 subscribers9,6626 August 20261 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,605–9,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 07:399,662-3
28 Aug 2026, 22:089,665-14
22 Aug 2026, 14:159,679+1
19 Aug 2026, 01:079,678+9
16 Aug 2026, 07:359,669+23
12 Aug 2026, 12:159,646+24
9 Aug 2026, 20:539,622+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:329,620+5
6 Aug 2026, 08:189,615first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.4%
avg views ÷ 9,662 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,900
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held27 (11 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total31,220
Reactions total1,653
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 50s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,030 reactions across 27 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,15762.8%
💔1,44928.8%
🕊1813.60%
😭1012.01%
🙏751.49%
👍671.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,850 views210 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

186🕊18🙏6

23 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈1,840 views99 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

92🕊5👍2

21 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,260 views190 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💔11760😭7🕊6

17 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈3,290 views111 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

96🕊8🙏4👍2😭1

17 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈3,860 views203 reactionsread 29 August 2026

الشكر زيادة في النعم عن أبي عبد اللَّه (عليه السَّلام) قال: (مَكْتُوبٌ فِي اَلتَّوْرَاةِ أُشْكُرْ مَنْ أَنْعَمَ عَلَيْكَ، وَأَنْعِمْ عَلَى مَنْ شَكَرَكَ، فَإِنَّهُ لاَ زَوَالَ لِلنَّعْمَاءِ إِذَا شُكِرَتْ، وَلاَ بَقَاءَ لَهَا إِذَا كُفِرَتْ اَلشُّكْرُ زِيَادَةٌ فِي اَلنِّعَمِ وَأَمَانٌ مِنَ اَلْغِيَرِ).[1] الشكر غذاء الروح،، ومن أراد أن يعيش مطمئنّاً فلينظر إلى الجوانب المشرقة، وإلى النِّعم من حوله، وإلى جوارحه وجوان

178🕊18😭3👍2🙏2

11 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈4,020 views185 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💔11750🕊11😭7

11 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈7,150 views268 reactionsread 29 August 2026

أَتَقُولُونَ ماتَ مُحَمَّدٌ صلّى الله عليه وآله؟! فَخَطْبٌ جَليلٌ اسْتَوْسَعَ وَهْيُهُ، وَاسْتَنْهَرَ فَتْقُهُ، وَانْفَتَقَ رَتْقُهُ، وَأَظْلَمَتِ الْأَرْضُ لِغَيْبَتِهِ، وَكُسِفَتِ النُّجُومُ لِمُصِيبَتِهِ، وَأَكْدَتِ الْآمالُ، وَخَشَعَتِ الْجِبالُ، وَاُضيعَ الْحَرِيمُ، وَاُزيلَتِ الْحُرْمَةُ عِنْدَ مَماتِهِ. فَتِلْكِ وَاللهِ النّازلَةُ الْكُبْرى، وَالْمُصيبَةُ الْعُظْمى... من خطبة الصديقة الزهراء(عليها السلام)

💔18468😭11👍5

5 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈6,950 views387 reactionsread 29 August 2026

سل حاجتك عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ عَنِ الصَّادِقِ جَعْفَرِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عليه السلام قَالَ: إِذَا قَالَ الْعَبْدُ وَ هُوَ سَاجِدٌ يَا اللَّهُ يَا رَبَّاهْ يَا سَيِّدَاهْ ثَلَاثَ مَرَّاتٍ أَجَابَهُ تَبَارَكَ وَ تَعَالَى لَبَّيْكَ عَبْدِي سَلْ حَاجَتَكَ. الأمالي (للصدوق) ص:411

337🙏21🕊20👍9

4 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈5,490 views241 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @shHsnali

وصول جابر بن عبد الله الانصاري وعطيه العوفي عند قبر الحسين عليه السلام .. قال: المسنيه يا عطية، فألمسته، فخر على القبر مغشياً عليه، فرششت عليه شيئاً من الماء، أفاق قال: يا حسين، يا حسين، يا حسين، ثلاثاً، ثمّ قال: حبيب لا يجيب حبيبه، وأنّى لك بالجواب وقد شخبت أوداجك على أثباجك، وفرّق بين رأسك وبدنك، فأشهد أنك ابن خاتم النبيين، وابن سيد الوصيّين، وحليف التقى، وسليل الهدى، وخامس أصحاب الكساء وابن سيد النقباء، وابن فاطمة

💔16560😭13🕊3

29 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈6,230 views145 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

127🕊9💔7👍2

29 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC≈15,700 views436 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

إجرام آل سعود ليس بجديدٍ حقدُهم على الشيعة وعلى كربلاء. فقد هاجم أجدادُهم المؤسسون كربلاء عام 1802م، وارتكبوا فيها مقتلةً عظيمة. أمّا هم فقد أرسلوا الانتحاريين إلى مدننا، ورعوا لسنواتٍ طويلةٍ عملياتِ القتل المنظَّمة بحق أتباع أهل البيت (عليهم السلام). ولكن لن يطفئوا نور الله، وكما قالت السيدة زينب الكبرى (عليها السلام): «وَلَيَجْتَهِدَنَّ أَئِمَّةُ الْكُفْرِ وَأَشْيَاعُ الضَّلَالَةِ فِي مَحْوِهِ وَتَطْمِيسِهِ، فَلَا

💔291124😭9🙏8👍4

28 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC≈4,830 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://youtu.be/RULjgYDpZyQ

90🕊4😭4

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @S_SadiqModarresi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,193 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مرتضى المدرسي
@smortadha · 38,111
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
السيد بهاء الموسوي
@musawu · 38,466
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
الائمة الاثنا عشر
@The12ImamsWeb · 40,626
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صادق المدرسي” (@S_SadiqModarresi), 9,662 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_SadiqModarresi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.