Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💎SHADIO-CHALLENGE💎

Channel

💎SHADIO-CHALLENGE💎

@ShadioChallenge

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,019subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261791787
TypeChannel
Username@ShadioChallenge
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShadioChallenge

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ShadioChallenge/14943 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC@sofia_mashkok_FX/18473 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@ShadioChallenge/14955 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC@sofia_mashkok_FX/18556 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC1.007 minutes
@ShadioChallenge/14956 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC@sofia_mashkok_FX/18576 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@ShadioChallenge/14958 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC@sofia_mashkok_FX/18597 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sofia_mashkok_FX5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ShadioChallenge — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,0194,0714,0457 August 2026 — 4,071 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,069 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,063 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,056 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,048 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,045 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,041 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,036 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,033 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,019 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,011–4,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 12:174,019-14
2 Sept 2026, 09:354,033+1
30 Aug 2026, 07:274,032-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:454,036-5
24 Aug 2026, 04:084,041-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:574,045-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:084,048-8
13 Aug 2026, 04:134,056-7
10 Aug 2026, 08:184,063-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:564,069-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:474,071first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 22 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4429.3%
❤‍🔥3422.7%
👍2315.3%
🔥1812.0%
🐳85.33%
🥰64.00%
👌42.67%
🍓32.00%
👏32.00%
🍾21.33%
🎉21.33%
🤔21.33%
🙏10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆 إعلان نتيجة مسابقة توقع إغلاق الذهب 🏆 ألف مبروك للفائز 🎉 يرجى من الفائز التواصل مع فريق الدعم وارسال رقم الحساب لاستلام الجائزة. @Shadio_challenge_support

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC122 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔥 نتائج صفقات الأسبوعية لقناة Shadio Liquidity Hunters 🔸GOLD 80 PIP ✔️ 🔸US30 100 PIP❌ 🔸GOLD 330 PIP✔️ 🔸GOLD 300 PIP ✔️ 🔸GOLD 130 PIP❌ 🔸GOLD 70 PIP❌ 🔸GOLD 60 PIP❌ 🔸GOLD 350 PIP ✔️ 🔸GOLD 70 PIP ❌ 🔸GOLD 150 PIP✔️ 🔸GOLD 200 PIP✔️ 🔸GOLD 130 PIP ✔️ 🙂 مجموع الصفقات لهذا الأسبوع 🕯 1110 PIP

❤‍🔥4👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC148 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

📊 كيف تتوقعون حركة الذهب بعد صدور خبر الوظائف NFP اليوم؟ 🟡🔥

  1. صاعد لمستويات 4400 دولار للأونصة📈54%
  2. هابط لمستويات 4230 دولار للأونصة46%
  3. سوف يبقى بحركة عرضية!0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3❤‍🔥1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC162 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 اليوم موعد خبر الوظائف الأمريكية (NFP) 🇺🇸📊 🕒 الساعة 3:30 بتوقيت دمشق. يُعتبر خبر NFP من أقوى الأخبار الاقتصادية، لأنه يوضح عدد الوظائف التي أُضيفت في الولايات المتحدة خلال الشهر الماضي (باستثناء القطاع الزراعي)، ومن خلاله يقيس السوق قوة الاقتصاد الأمريكي. لذلك غالبًا نشهد تقلبات قوية وسريعة على الذهب، الدولار، والعملات الرئيسية بعد صدور الخبر مباشرة. تمنياتنا للجميع بتداول موفق، ولا تنسوا إدارة المخاطر. 💚📈

❤‍🔥2🔥21👍1

7 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC155 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

صباح الخير يا أحلى ناس، كيفكم اليوم؟ جمعة مباركة، الله يجعلها جمعة مليانة خير وراحة وبشائر حلوة للجميع.

3❤‍🔥1👍1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 ترامب يواصل الضغط على رئيس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي .. 🏛🇺🇸😐 يجري الرئيس الأمريكي "دونالد ترامب" اتصالات هاتفية مع رئيس مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي "كيفن وارش" منذ توليه المنصب في مايو الماضي، وفقاً لما نقلته وكالة "بلومبرج" عن مصادر مطلعة. 🔥 تتزايد الضغوط والشكوك التي يثيرها الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب تجاه رئيس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، مطالبًا بخفض أسعار الفائدة لدعم الاقتصاد. 📉 الأسواق تترقب ما إذا كان الاحتياطي الفيدر

❤‍🔥41🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC173 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 اليوم | الميزانية العمومية للاحتياطي الفيدرالي ⏰ موعد الإصدار: 11:30 مساءً بتوقيت دمشق يترقب المتداولون صدور بيانات الميزانية العمومية للفيدرالي (Fed Balance Sheet)، والتي تعطي صورة عن مستوى السيولة في الأسواق وتوجهات السياسة النقدية. 📈 أي تغيرات في حجم الميزانية قد تنعكس على حركة الدولار، الذهب، والأسهم، لذلك يُنصح بمتابعة الخبر وإدارة المخاطر بحذر وقت صدوره. بالتوفيق للجميع 📊

👍21🔥1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC170 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

صباح الخير يا أحلى ناس، شو أخباركم؟ إن شاءالله أموركم تمام.

❤‍🔥32🐳2👍1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC258 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

فريق شاديو تشالنج يتقدّم بأجمل التهاني لمدام رهام، مديرة مكتب شركتنا في الإمارات العربية المتحدة بمناسبة عيد ميلادها السعيد نتمنى لكِ عامًا جديدًا مليئًا بالنجاحات، والفرح والصحة والتألق الدائم، كما عهدناك دائمًا مصدرًا للإلهام والإيجابية، عسى أيامكِ القادمة أجمل من كل ما مضى ..

9🍓3❤‍🔥2🍾2🎉2

5 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC203 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 تنويه مهم للغروب 🚨 اليوم الساعة 11:30 بتوقيت سوريا سيكون هناك خطاب للرئيس ترامب، والذي يترقبه الكثيرون لمتابعة أبرز التصريحات والنقاط التي سيتم طرحها خلال الكلمة. ويأتي هذا الخطاب في وقت تحظى فيه التطورات المتعلقة بمضيق هرمز باهتمام واسع، حيث يراقب الجميع أي تصريحات أو مواقف قد يتم الحديث عنها خلال الخطاب. نرجو متابعة الكلمة باهتمام والانتباه لأهم التفاصيل التي سيتم طرحها، وانتظار وضوح الصورة بعد انتهاء الخطاب.

❤‍🔥21👍1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🛢️ النفط يتراجع، وسط ترقب المستثمرين لتطورات المحادثات بين الولايات المتحدة وإيران بشأن أمن الملاحة في مضيق هرمز.

2👍2❤‍🔥1🐳1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC194 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

صباح الخير يا أحلى ناس، كيفكم اليوم؟ الله يجعل يومكم مليان طاقة حلوة.

❤‍🔥5👍1🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ShadioChallenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTCFinal Results28 voters

📊 كيف تتوقعون حركة الذهب بعد صدور خبر الوظائف NFP اليوم؟ 🟡🔥

  1. صاعد لمستويات 4400 دولار للأونصة📈54%
  2. هابط لمستويات 4230 دولار للأونصة46%
  3. سوف يبقى بحركة عرضية!0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أسعار صرف الدولار والذهب
@DollarDamas2 · 99,791
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
⚡️WHALES⚡️
@whalesforex0 · 112,423
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Learn English Everyday
@learningEnglish00 · 105,774
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
نشرة اخبار الفوركس 📰
@ForexNewspaper · 121,347
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💎SHADIO-CHALLENGE💎” (@ShadioChallenge), 4,019 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShadioChallenge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.